rhajel
Region: US
Wednesday 05 August 2026 21:40:20 GMT
8221
668
203
4
Music
Download
Comments
Roy :
the evidence overwhelmingly without a doubt makes it clear she did it
2026-08-06 00:41:58
102
emaverett15 :
As a nurse practitioner, the body temp of 82F doesn’t make sense to me. I work in hospice and the times I’ve been asked to pronounce pts who have passed and it took me 30-45 mins to arrive at the pt’s home their temps were still in the 90s!! It doesn’t add up to me!
2026-08-06 00:46:09
53
Colombiano :
And women are saying she didn't do it without any concrete evidence
2026-08-06 01:44:55
33
MegHoy :
Had she been accused of strangling three dogs due to psychosis yall would be frothing at the mouth for the death penalty.
2026-08-06 00:22:34
35
ionplayz :
Girl she admitted to it and is trying to plead not guilty by reason of insanity. That means she did it but shouldn’t be criminally persecuted because her mental state wasn’t in the right because of her psychosis.
2026-08-06 04:44:58
21
josephmorales18365 :
It’s because we think without emotions
2026-08-06 01:47:25
2
SwoodGoose117 :
I mean she admitted to in her civil case. so this is just a sentencing trial to see if she weasels out of jail but yall think theyre gonna drop an imaginary bomb like its a TV show
2026-08-06 00:58:40
21
𝐺 𝐴 𝐵 𝑅 𝐼 𝐸 𝐿 𝐿 𝐸 :
No it’s people who hold other people accountable too not just men but people who recognize that mental illness isn’t an excuse because many serial k!llers have been locked away for life even though they have severe mental issues
2026-08-05 23:44:32
17
Real_Jamie :
this isn’t some netflix documentary bro just a woman who was sick that committed an atrocity and now has to face the consequences hopefuly she gets the help she needs while locked up
2026-08-06 01:23:49
20
rhajel :
Mind you bro aint even keeping his story straight
2026-08-05 21:49:05
15
Kaitlin🦋 :
Y’all are ignoring the no evidence part and trying to blame Patrick… so what’s the difference? SHE killed her kids. The trial isn’t to prove that bc it’s already been proven. It’s to see if she was criminally responsible for it. Prison or a hospital.
2026-08-06 10:19:00
2
sticky wicky :
she googled how long the trip would take and made a custom food delivery order that same day to make sure she had time. all accounts show the husband asked countless time if the doctor thought she was okay to left alone and doctors said she would be okay.
2026-08-06 02:59:40
3
Breannon :
Her lawyer sees Patrick is sus and is pointing everything out. He’s going to be investigated watch.
2026-08-06 04:10:52
3
Unsuspecting.Armadillo :
“Ignore evidence” and “blame Lindsay Clancy” are opposites as literally all the evidence points to her and her legal team agrees
2026-08-06 03:24:32
9
Peamup Bubber :
hey guys! is anyone ACTUALLY keeping uo with the case??? this isnt a guilty trial. this is a sentencing trial. her LAWYERS say she murdered them. that is NOT the debate. extensive diary entry, full fledged plan, use of different items per child??? i feel crazy that this is EVEN an opinion
2026-08-06 08:48:17
4
Dustin :
The whole point of this trial is to determine if she’s legitimately guilty or guilty by reason of insanity, her innocence was disproven by the state of Massachusetts 3 years ago
2026-08-06 01:50:05
7
Crochet System :
the wording of his phone call about the children's death and the core body temp are what solidified it for me. that alongside him immediately running off to a new wife to have new kids. its giving Chris Watts
2026-08-06 03:18:56
1
BingBong :
Yes bc we are looking at all of the facts not making up our own bs narratives
2026-08-06 03:20:15
7
IttyBigbangWokWok :
Also while yall have no evidence against him and resort to “he did it” “I just know argument” as if yall are actual detectives
2026-08-06 06:57:39
3
FrancisIQ :
Just talking about this. I think “mothers” are more sympathetic
2026-08-06 02:56:16
0
Is it time yet? :
Nope. She did and admitted she did. Her attorneys admitted she did. This trial just a matter of where she will go. Prison or hospital. They are not trying to prove her innocence. Just that she was insane when she killed her children.
2026-08-06 05:47:43
4
nurfherder :
the evidence points to her doing it. she even said she did it
2026-08-06 05:26:06
0
djb3434 :
so her lawsuit means nothing to anyone???
2026-08-06 02:07:41
0
✨🖤KiJi_Cyber🖤✨ :
She has literally admitted to the crime in front of the judge with a stipulation saying she is the cause for their deaths. While a lot of stuff doesn’t add up, the fact remains that she did it. The not guilty plea is for insanity considering she was not in her right mind.
2026-08-06 03:17:35
3
B Johnson :
Women are forgetting that she agreed to a stipulation of facts which means she’s not contesting she did it she’s contesting that she wasn’t mentally sound when she did it that’s why the defense is arguing insanity instead of pointing the finger at Patrick
2026-08-06 07:52:49
3
To see more videos from user @rhajel, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
