@yennhi_ne19: ngà thầy huấn hoa hồng lúc này #gaixinhtiktok #xuhuong #thinhhanh #huanhoahong#thayhuan

YẾN NHI
YẾN NHI
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Thursday 06 August 2026 12:37:15 GMT
3380
17
0
2

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @yennhi_ne19, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Will the future favor better AI, or better-managed AI? Imagine two companies buy access to exactly the same AI tomorrow. Same models. Same capabilities. Same agents. A year later, one has transformed how work gets done, while the other is still running pilots and wondering why employees don't trust the technology. What explains the difference? I don't think it will be AI. We've spent the last few years treating access to intelligence as the advantage. That made sense when capabilities differed dramatically and only a small number of organizations could use them effectively. But as powerful AI becomes widely available, I think something interesting happens. The model becomes rented capability. The management system around it remains yours. One company may give agents broad autonomy without clear accountability. Another may review every output until managers become bottlenecks. A third may deliberately define decision rights, escalation paths, boundaries, validation, and feedback before agents ever begin operating independently. All three can have the same technology. They don't have the same organization. That's why I increasingly believe AI advantage will migrate from acquisition to orchestration. Buying intelligence becomes easier, while building an organization capable of using it well remains difficult. If I were preparing for that future, I would worry less about whether we have the best model and more about whether we know how to govern the one we already have. Because your competitor can probably access the same AI. They can't download your management maturity. What do you think? When powerful AI becomes available to everyone, will better technology still separate companies, or will better-managed AI become the real advantage? #HumanAgentOrchestrator #AIReadiness #HybridManagement #OrchestrationDesign #EnterpriseAI
Will the future favor better AI, or better-managed AI? Imagine two companies buy access to exactly the same AI tomorrow. Same models. Same capabilities. Same agents. A year later, one has transformed how work gets done, while the other is still running pilots and wondering why employees don't trust the technology. What explains the difference? I don't think it will be AI. We've spent the last few years treating access to intelligence as the advantage. That made sense when capabilities differed dramatically and only a small number of organizations could use them effectively. But as powerful AI becomes widely available, I think something interesting happens. The model becomes rented capability. The management system around it remains yours. One company may give agents broad autonomy without clear accountability. Another may review every output until managers become bottlenecks. A third may deliberately define decision rights, escalation paths, boundaries, validation, and feedback before agents ever begin operating independently. All three can have the same technology. They don't have the same organization. That's why I increasingly believe AI advantage will migrate from acquisition to orchestration. Buying intelligence becomes easier, while building an organization capable of using it well remains difficult. If I were preparing for that future, I would worry less about whether we have the best model and more about whether we know how to govern the one we already have. Because your competitor can probably access the same AI. They can't download your management maturity. What do you think? When powerful AI becomes available to everyone, will better technology still separate companies, or will better-managed AI become the real advantage? #HumanAgentOrchestrator #AIReadiness #HybridManagement #OrchestrationDesign #EnterpriseAI

About