@bloombergopinion: There are a lot of jobs in the US economy that pay miserably low wages. And there are a lot that offer a reasonable hourly rate but still result in miserably low earnings because of unstable, fluctuating schedules. How many is hard to know, but it’s not a small number: According to the Government Accountability Office, there are about 9 million #Medicaid recipients who are working full-time, and 7.5 million who receive #SNAP benefits. But the most interesting aspect of the report, according to @keds_economist may be where exactly these people work. The GAO collected data from 11 state agencies to identify the employers. Most of these full-time workers on need-based assistance worked for the private sector in transportation, restaurants and retail. While one in five employees work for small businesses with fewer than 10 employees, more than half work for employers that had at least 100 employees. #Amazon #Fedex #Walmart
Bloomberg Opinion
Region: US
Thursday 06 August 2026 16:34:17 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
L ellingw :
Medicaid is far better than private insurance with high deductibles. Take Medicaid.
2026-08-24 16:00:18
0
Barbara :
If a corporation has workers that qualify for public assistance then the corporations should be charged a back tax to the federal/state government to cover the cost.
2026-08-08 01:16:46
127
Straightshooter :
Exactly!! Make corporations responsible for their workers. Such a scam that corp profits are what they are but their employees are on Medicaid and we’re paying for that.
2026-08-07 14:52:57
126
Tik Toker :
A generation fought for labor rights, a generation benefited from those rights, now a generation takes them for granted, and the next generation will have to fight again
2026-08-11 22:31:22
11
Patrick :
And now grocers reportedly want a bailout. Why? Because so many people have lost SNAP food benefits that the sales, and profits, of grocery chains around the country are suffering. A bailout of the corporate grocers would just be a benefit transfer from individuals to corporations.
2026-08-07 03:59:38
53
Todd Grainger :
But we also have date from 1940’s-70’s that show us when we tax corporations appropriately that it doesn’t spell economic ruin like we have been made to believe.
2026-08-16 21:40:51
3
Non F. Urbizness :
Ever notice the advocates for higher wages NEVER go out and create any high wage businesses?
2026-08-08 06:06:13
4
Chicago-burbs explorer :
So we do have socialism but for corporations and billionaires
2026-08-08 14:07:28
20
janaejeanmusic :
No everyone should be on medicaid. We need single payer healthcare
2026-08-08 15:17:08
9
Kevin Wall :
I am hoping for massive reform in this area once a more progressive administration gets into office
2026-08-07 17:53:53
20
jcodman3 :
This is corporate welfare. It’s total BS. 😡
2026-08-07 17:49:39
23
mike :
OK, which would you prefer secretary of commerce or secretary of the treasury?
2026-08-07 21:10:46
18
Dave :
I think this experiment failed.
2026-08-07 17:56:45
16
Andee Dwyer :
Corporate liability/responsibility never should our healthcare been tied to our employment. All corporations see is an expense eating away at profits!
2026-08-08 04:01:26
6
R a c h e l :
This.
2026-08-08 14:23:01
3
vierja11 :
There goes the American dream
2026-08-08 01:03:21
5
Solutions 1 :
The GOP parades around about capitalism but we’ve seen at every turn they will offload things like healthcare & retirement to their employees and the government responsibility
2026-08-07 21:36:17
8
rj :
The **corporate marginal tax rate in 1959 was 52%**. This rate applied to the highest levels of corporate income during that time.
2026-08-07 16:14:41
8
Robin E :
Sounds like a Capitalist hell-hole🤔
2026-08-06 21:05:57
7
hummingjessica🍉 :
could I make a suggestion for a series, I was going through your series list and was curious about how people on disability try to navigate other channels of income. like the cap of having $2k in their bank account, is there any suggestions in financial institutions or seasonal credits recommendations?
2026-08-13 20:52:07
1
Geoff :
Not only are the full time employees receiving subsidies, but they end up paying a lot of those subsidies back to the very companies that are paying them a less than livable wage by buying groceries from Walmart or getting their medicines from Amazon.
2026-08-16 23:38:40
3
manwhale 🐋 :
why shouldn’t the minimum wage pay more than the qualification level for government assistance? i thought assistance programs are supposed to be insurance against poverty? the way you described it means that it’s an indirect corporate subsidy?
2026-08-19 21:58:47
1
scott :
Incredibly logical!
2026-08-09 05:18:18
3
gilsnwnativegardens.com :
“Higher mandatory compensation has consequences.”
This is probably their strongest economic argument. If government forces labor costs substantially higher, businesses can respond with higher prices, fewer workers, reduced hours, automation or reduced investment. CBO does indeed find that sufficiently large minimum-wage increases involve a tradeoff: higher earnings for many low-wage workers but potential employment losses for others."
2026-08-10 19:40:59
1
.. :
Thank you.
2026-08-10 09:44:42
1
To see more videos from user @bloombergopinion, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.