esoteric heathen
Region: US
Thursday 06 August 2026 23:06:10 GMT
1937
159
19
3
Music
Download
Comments
Jeff4Truth :
the shroud is 100% fake. Christians have to manufacture evidence for their bogus religion.
2026-08-07 01:25:59
3
Canadian man :
is that a catholic thing ?
2026-08-07 03:51:44
1
DarkWingDuck7.0 :
See, this is why I don’t think you can just say, “Carbon dating says medieval, case closed.” Carbon dating is useful, but it depends on the sample you test and what happened to that sample over time. The 1988 test came from one area of the Shroud, and there has been legitimate debate over whether that area was chemically or physically representative of the rest of the cloth. So testing one little section does not automatically settle every question about the entire Shroud. Then you have the WAXS testing, which stands for Wide Angle X ray Scattering. It is not a laser test and it is not the same thing as carbon dating. It looks at the aging of the cellulose in the linen. That study found results compatible with linen roughly 2,000 years old, assuming certain long term temperature and humidity conditions. So now you have another method pointing toward a much older date than the 1988 carbon test. Does that prove the Shroud is Jesus’ burial cloth? No. But it absolutely means there is conflicting scientific evidence, so acting like the carbon date ended the discussion is way too simple. Then there’s the image itself. Researchers from the Shroud of Turin Research Project reported that they could not find paint, pigment, dye, or stain that accounted for the body image. There was even a medieval bishop who claimed an artist had confessed to making it, but he never gave us the artist’s name or demonstrated the method that supposedly produced the image. And there have been experiments using extremely intense ultraviolet radiation that produced very shallow coloration on linen with some characteristics similar to the Shroud image. That does not prove a radioactive event happened, but it does show why people are still looking at some kind of intense energy as a possible image formation mechanism. And when I bring up Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I’m making a comparison, not saying it was the same process. Those blasts produced such intense thermal radiation that objects and people blocked some of that energy and left visible shadow patterns behind. Horrible events, obviously, but they show what an enormous burst of energy can do to a surface.
2026-08-08 15:10:01
1
🌞Cody✨ :
Davinci made it
2026-08-07 07:08:14
1
DFW :
one of the many good books on topic. but tim wallace-murphys book custodians of truth great too
2026-08-16 17:30:13
0
Versace Highest👑 :
I've learned this from your page. Science + Spiritual = 0, which means Science = - Spiritual, also, Spiritual = - Science ,,, Men plan, God laughs.💔
2026-08-07 01:05:43
1
MKForChrist :
I don’t need the shroud there is far more evidence but the shroud is a good one! Watch Jeremiah Johnston he’s a professional archaeologist so I would have to side with a professional on this one!
2026-08-11 19:31:34
0
nobby :
it's a master piece... manufactured piece
2026-08-06 23:26:42
1
Next3 :
The dating might be correct. Our history timeline might be corrupted
2026-08-07 14:03:40
1
Karen Fleming :
it's not 1200's
2026-08-07 00:20:50
1
ML Lepley :
Dr Jeremiah Johnston spoke on TCN about this.. testing on the shroud. very interesting interview on this.
2026-08-07 00:34:20
1
DarkWingDuck7.0 :
What are you talking about, the 3 to 1 herringbone weave “wasn’t around” in the first century? That’s way too absolute. The Shroud is a 3 to 1 herringbone twill, yes. And the exact same kind of linen cloth has not been securely found in a first century Judean burial. Fine. But that is not the same thing as proving the weave could not exist. Twill and herringbone weaving existed in the Roman world. There are Roman period textiles with herringbone twill, and researchers have pointed to 3 to 1 twill examples from around the third century in places like Palmyra and Roman Britain. So the real argument is that the Shroud’s exact weave was unusual for first century Judea and we don’t currently have a perfect archaeological match. That is very different from saying, “They couldn’t make that weave back then.” You can’t turn, “We haven’t found another exact example,” into, “Therefore it didn’t exist.” And considering how little ancient textile survives in the first place, that’s a pretty big leap.
2026-08-08 15:11:39
1
tik tok hok :
you said half truth like truth 😆😆😆😆...old tehnology and new tehnology . you forgat it ha 😆😆
2026-08-07 10:49:30
1
jamesdunn111777 :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-08-07 13:29:34
1
rihardsvitolsPipars :
👍👍👍
2026-08-07 03:11:40
1
Answill0 :
😂😂😂
2026-08-06 23:19:08
1
Tom Tran508 :
👍👍
2026-08-12 13:02:22
0
To see more videos from user @americanreligion, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
