@yiqu455huan: #pukanacua #puka #pukanacuaformvp #nfl #nflfootball

HunterBig :

it's all storybook

SneekyToucan :

Jesus was a Jew

-bogi- :

true but why is trump in the background?

Gibbles and bits :

Former PK here. I’ve known since I was like 5 it was all BS

Vittman Vittman :

But many people don't care about evidence, far less proof. The promise of eternal life in return for blind obedience is all they need...

latrinalogan0 :

I’m so confused!

ComradeMarx :

thank you!

Jim Nirou :

You forgot that no one mentioned the zombies who roam the earth, but no one noticed or mentioned them outside the Bible.

Inti Gulzar :

leonardh84🇨🇦 :

It's all bs. The story of the resurrection predates Christ. Like most of the Bible It's just another story stolen from other religions.

Bill Miller :

Mythology doesn't need facts, just believers

DARIA🪽 :

you wanted them to make you a video?😂

rihardsvitolsPipars :

💯💯💯

Dylan Jimenez :

💝💝💝

rihardsvitolsPipars :

👍👍👍

Marotube Scream :

Confusing complementary details with 'contradictions' shows a total misunderstanding of historical accounts! 🛑 1. Who Found the Tomb? John focuses on Mary Magdalene, but look at John 20:2! Mary literally says: 'They have taken the Lord... and WE do not know where they have laid him.' John knew other women were with her. Mentioning one person doesn't mean only one was there! 2. What Time Was It? They left their homes while it was still dark (John 20:1) and arrived at the tomb as the sun was breaking at dawn/sunrise (Mark 16:2). That’s just called a morning walk! 3. The Stone: Matthew explains HOW the stone was rolled away (by an angel). Mark describes WHAT the women saw when they got there (the stone already moved). That’s harmony, not a conflict! 4. Location: Jesus appeared in Jerusalem AND Galilee during the 40 days between His resurrection and ascension (Acts 1:3). Different authors highlighting different appearances over 40 days isn't a contradiction! 5. Paul and the Tomb: Paul explicitly writes in 1 Corinthians 15:4 that Jesus 'was buried, and that he was raised on the third day.' You can't preach a physical burial and resurrection without an empty grave! Slight differences in eyewitness perspectives don't disprove an event—in historical science and law, independent details prove the accounts weren't colluded!

Marotube Scream :

Claiming there is 'zero evidence' for the Resurrection ignores basic historical methodology! 🛑 1. The 'Minimal Facts' Scholars Agree On: Virtually ALL historians (including atheist/agnostic scholars) agree on these historical facts: Jesus died by Roman crucifixion. His tomb was found empty. Multiple groups/individuals believed they experienced Him alive shortly after. The movement exploded immediately in the exact city where He was executed. 2. The Witness Detail No One Would Invent: The Gospel accounts record women as the first witnesses to the empty tomb. In 1st-century Jewish culture, a woman's testimony wasn't even valid in court. If the story was made up, they would NEVER have used female witnesses! 3. People Don't Die for a Lie They Invented: The Apostles and early skeptics (like Paul and James) were tortured and executed for claiming they saw the risen Jesus. People might die for a false belief, but nobody dies for a hoax they fabricated themselves! 4. Early Historical Creeds: Creeds documenting the Resurrection (like 1 Corinthians 15:3–8) date back to within 3 to 5 years of the event itself. That's way too early for legend to develop! Ignoring early manuscripts, hostile sources, and the martyrdom of eyewitnesses isn't critical thinking—it's just ignoring history!

Mir :

Trump has convered to Jews religion.