@surabayatv: Kalimantan Barat - Sebuah video yang beredar di media sosial menjadi perhatian warganet setelah memperlihatkan seorang anak dan ibu kandungnya terlibat dalam sebuah insiden di kawasan Pantai Sungai, Kampung Ladang, Sintang, Kalimantan Barat, pada 6 Agustus 2026. Berdasarkan informasi yang beredar, insiden tersebut diduga bermula dari persoalan pengambilan foto yang tidak sesuai dengan keinginan sang anak. Namun, kronologi lengkap serta kebenaran informasi tersebut masih belum terverifikasi secara independen. Peristiwa ini menjadi perhatian karena melibatkan hubungan antara anak dan orang tua. Masyarakat diimbau untuk tidak langsung menyimpulkan atau menyebarkan identitas pihak yang terlibat sebelum ada keterangan resmi dari pihak berwenang. Jika terjadi perselisihan dalam keluarga, penyelesaian secara tenang dan tanpa tindakan yang merugikan pihak lain menjadi hal yang penting. #tiktokberita #beritaviral #beritaterkini #viral #surabayatv

SurabayaTV
SurabayaTV
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Friday 07 August 2026 14:49:30 GMT
8213079
545347
9210
116030

Music

Download

Comments

cannyy0_0
ndah_💨 :
gw heran smaa ibu nya knpa ga marah
2026-08-08 01:32:54
214803
vaniamichel31
paniaaa31 :
Difotoin mama❤️🥹
2026-08-10 02:14:04
26318
valx779
val? yes that's me :
bukannya di pisah in malas di video, hadeh
2026-08-07 15:14:27
104301
kiacntkmnslculcu
skli lagi ini kia :
gw sekesel apapun ga brni nendang juga kali jir😭
2026-08-07 15:10:31
43780
_asstrilestarii
astrid :
stress
2026-08-23 13:08:12
0
mamarazkaa1
Nyonya Muda💸 :
Anak2 sekarang tu pada kenapa sih heran gue
2026-08-07 14:58:02
40112
yesuyyyyy
tarisha˙˚ʚ(´◡`)ɞ˚˙ :
stress kah dia??? kasihan ibunya 😞😞
2026-08-07 15:01:42
1758
ristiseptiyani3
Risti Septiyani :
guyss ini kejadiannya di daerah ku kabupaten sintang, kalbar. si cwe itu pasien jiwa rawat jalan, sempat putus minum obat beberapa hari karena obatnya di sembunyiin sama tunangan nya.
2026-08-09 03:43:24
117
clmevall
VZz :
g sengaja bentak ibu aja gw kepikiran sehari semalam
2026-08-11 13:22:47
31
nissanrh_
niscaaaca :
difotoin mama😻❤️
2026-08-14 10:42:05
8
blushmuse_renv
moonlitaura :
kenapa sih setiap ada anak yang kaya gini ibu nya tuh selalu sabar😭😭
2026-08-08 04:24:43
7481
iniamelkedua4
mel! :
pentingnya peran gue disana
2026-08-08 09:51:28
847
hooleesheet18s
Hoo Lee Sheet🙀 :
Gua si ga berani nge judge ya soalnya kita juga ga tau apa yang di alami anak itu.
2026-08-11 08:47:00
6
dindagengstersebelah_
𐙚dindα֟α🫧 :
gila seberani itu njir nendang2,gua aja ngomong nada tinggi dikit aja udah ditabok..
2026-08-23 13:42:52
6
riz.arabiaaa
Riz :
bu kutuk dia plisss😭
2026-08-08 02:01:08
331
strawbery0724
24juli✿ :
sllu jadi fotograper buat anak2ku smp saat ini🥰
2026-08-12 05:01:23
12
To see more videos from user @surabayatv, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

We often treat politics as a kind of team sport, where the only goal is for our side to win. But a long, long time ago, Plato argued that if we want politics to work, then we have to put every candidate through a two-part test before they get anywhere near the ballot box. For Plato, leadership shouldn’t be seen as a prize to be won, but rather a public duty and a responsibility. Plato said that before we give anybody the wealth, the status, and the power of office, they need to answer these two questions. First, are you willing to put the public’s interest ahead of your own? This sounds simple, but the politician doesn’t stop being a human when they are given a title. And all humans care about themselves and their loved ones, at least to some extent. But Plato argues that to be a good leader means putting the country’s interests above your own, even if it costs you your wealth, your reputation, and your ego. If there’s even a whiff of self-interest, you should be disqualified. And the second question is, are you willing to serve the whole public and not just your supporters? Plato hated factionalism, and he thought that any politician who looks after only those who elected them, or those who gave them money, isn’t a politician — they are a factionalist. Plato argued that a good leader needs to fight just as fiercely for those who didn’t vote for them as those who did. So if we subjected the politicians of today to these questions, how many do you think would survive them? And who do you think was the last great leader who embodied both of these?
We often treat politics as a kind of team sport, where the only goal is for our side to win. But a long, long time ago, Plato argued that if we want politics to work, then we have to put every candidate through a two-part test before they get anywhere near the ballot box. For Plato, leadership shouldn’t be seen as a prize to be won, but rather a public duty and a responsibility. Plato said that before we give anybody the wealth, the status, and the power of office, they need to answer these two questions. First, are you willing to put the public’s interest ahead of your own? This sounds simple, but the politician doesn’t stop being a human when they are given a title. And all humans care about themselves and their loved ones, at least to some extent. But Plato argues that to be a good leader means putting the country’s interests above your own, even if it costs you your wealth, your reputation, and your ego. If there’s even a whiff of self-interest, you should be disqualified. And the second question is, are you willing to serve the whole public and not just your supporters? Plato hated factionalism, and he thought that any politician who looks after only those who elected them, or those who gave them money, isn’t a politician — they are a factionalist. Plato argued that a good leader needs to fight just as fiercely for those who didn’t vote for them as those who did. So if we subjected the politicians of today to these questions, how many do you think would survive them? And who do you think was the last great leader who embodied both of these?

About