@deusemeuguiaofc: valuation bilionario e lucro real @romero.rodrigues #romerorodriguescy

Deus o caminho

Open In TikTok:

Region: BR

Monday 10 August 2026 00:56:10 GMT

94

1

0

0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.78MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.78MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.93MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @deusemeuguiaofc, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Xinh ạ #thoitrang #xuongmaykienthuy #vayxinh #xuhuong #vayxinh

Xinh ạ #thoitrang #xuongmaykienthuy #vayxinh #xuhuong #vayxinh

Recibimos a compatriotas desde Venezuela luego de resultar afectados por el terremoto.

Recibimos a compatriotas desde Venezuela luego de resultar afectados por el terremoto.

1.5L Automatic Chick Feeder Fowl Chicken Poultry Breeding Food Feeder Dispenser with Handle Drinker #chickfeeder #chickendrinker

1.5L Automatic Chick Feeder Fowl Chicken Poultry Breeding Food Feeder Dispenser with Handle Drinker #chickfeeder #chickendrinker

#sister #bsf #fyp

#sister #bsf #fyp

🚨Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s approach to British national symbols reveals a profound discomfort with organic displays of English and British patriotism. The viral clip — even if it repurposes earlier remarks about actual rioters — taps into a genuine grievance: under his leadership, everyday expressions of national pride, such as flying the Union Jack or St George’s Cross, are increasingly framed as suspicious or “far-right” adjacent. This is emblematic of a deeper failing. Starmer lectures the public about “reclaiming the flag” for “inclusion” while his government and aligned institutions have spent years treating these symbols as problematic when raised by working-class communities concerned about rapid demographic change, mass migration, and cultural erosion. Patriotism isn’t something that needs sanitizing by Downing Street or rebranded as a diversity initiative — it’s a natural attachment to one’s homeland, history, and people. When a Prime Minister treats flag-flying campaigns like “Operation Raise the Colours” with suspicion rather than celebrating them, it signals a disconnect from the instincts of millions of ordinary Britons. Critics rightly point to a pattern of two-tiered attitudes: tolerance for other cultural displays and protests, paired with quick condemnation when native symbols appear en masse. This erodes trust. A confident nation doesn’t criminalize or pathologize its own flag. Starmer’s instinct to manage, lecture, and “contextualize” patriotism away from anything too robust or unapologetic makes him appear embarrassed by the very identity he claims to lead. True leadership would champion these symbols without caveats, not police the enthusiasm behind them. #viral #politics #foryou #trending #government

🚨Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s approach to British national symbols reveals a profound discomfort with organic displays of English and British patriotism. The viral clip — even if it repurposes earlier remarks about actual rioters — taps into a genuine grievance: under his leadership, everyday expressions of national pride, such as flying the Union Jack or St George’s Cross, are increasingly framed as suspicious or “far-right” adjacent. This is emblematic of a deeper failing. Starmer lectures the public about “reclaiming the flag” for “inclusion” while his government and aligned institutions have spent years treating these symbols as problematic when raised by working-class communities concerned about rapid demographic change, mass migration, and cultural erosion. Patriotism isn’t something that needs sanitizing by Downing Street or rebranded as a diversity initiative — it’s a natural attachment to one’s homeland, history, and people. When a Prime Minister treats flag-flying campaigns like “Operation Raise the Colours” with suspicion rather than celebrating them, it signals a disconnect from the instincts of millions of ordinary Britons. Critics rightly point to a pattern of two-tiered attitudes: tolerance for other cultural displays and protests, paired with quick condemnation when native symbols appear en masse. This erodes trust. A confident nation doesn’t criminalize or pathologize its own flag. Starmer’s instinct to manage, lecture, and “contextualize” patriotism away from anything too robust or unapologetic makes him appear embarrassed by the very identity he claims to lead. True leadership would champion these symbols without caveats, not police the enthusiasm behind them. #viral #politics #foryou #trending #government

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy