kitketi
Region: GE
Tuesday 11 August 2026 10:58:57 GMT
37730
4976
406
289
Music
Download
Comments
Matty :
now replace "men" and "women" with "people"
2026-08-11 22:01:15
203
~៹Θ𝔪𝚊ᵣ☆~ :
in my opinion I dont think 'Death' is a fair sentence they should probably get life in prison or sum but not death but the falsely accusing one should be more severe than the graping itself but still not deserving death
2026-08-11 18:24:56
3
𖣘𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘪 :
why "men", "women" and not people, every gender can grape
2026-08-11 15:00:07
147
ᯤ 𓈆 1% :
nahh bro, they both need to rot in the prison their whole life, not dying instantly
2026-08-11 17:15:11
4
YS | Yannised⁉️ :
i think death for false accusations is a bit too much
2026-08-11 12:04:37
46
ERI GB TT :
fyp thinks im a 6'7 chad
2026-08-11 11:37:33
394
ggz :
High IQ post
2026-08-11 14:18:21
3
sillyterangue :
high iq
2026-08-11 12:24:49
7
Than :
No, r4pist deserves longer jail time and women that falsely accuse need jail too, no one deserves actual death
2026-08-11 12:41:38
25
soul :
I cannot vote that yes but js plain yes
2026-08-11 20:04:31
6
кай :
notice how shes pretty
2026-08-11 20:24:38
17
Boro :
Fyp thinks I am a 6‘8 true Adam
2026-08-11 16:46:14
10
rvxfrxt :
Nah no way nobody deserving of death
2026-08-11 15:54:06
5
Dav✝️🇻🇦 :
I agree but not only men women too and men who accuse falsely too
2026-08-11 13:51:40
9
CONSTANT' :
neither deserve death
2026-08-11 12:40:35
10
💫🍀𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖗𝖙𝓢𝔃𝔃🐉 :
Terrible take
2026-08-11 14:13:18
5
Tini :
Life in prison for both would be better death is too small of a sentence
2026-08-11 18:51:09
18
𝐼𝑘𝑎𝑟𝑖 (怒り) 🪽 :
rape in general no matter the gender should be punished w a death penalty
2026-08-11 15:58:57
13
Gelovani :
finally a good take
2026-08-11 11:02:38
27
★Pillowfight_Champion★ :
My faith to humanity is returning
2026-08-11 21:15:13
6
Kureiton :
Nah I feel like this take is a 100% wrong I would never agree with something like this
2026-08-11 13:36:12
5
To see more videos from user @kittketi, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![I'm going to be honest, this actor from the movie zero day had no potential! ai generated ai ai ai all fake! #truecringecomunnity #menefrego #larp #edit #hero Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where](/video/cover/7648335726345571606.webp)
