@abusalehkingdom: CHHATAK Bazaar Quality 4K 60FPS 🫂 #chhatak #tiktok #foryou #highquality #iphone

AB🅤 🅢🅐LEH Kingdom
AB🅤 🅢🅐LEH Kingdom
Open In TikTok:
Region: BD
Wednesday 12 August 2026 15:44:06 GMT
2624
268
11
9

Music

Download

Comments

b.l.saim
⚘𝙈𝘼𝙁𝙄𝙔𝘼ᴳᵒᵈ〗 :
জয় বাংলা ১২০ এপিএস
2026-08-12 15:55:58
3
jowel.mia112
sr joy :
bai tor camrar jum bari dile kolijai agat lage 😯
2026-08-13 00:56:38
0
kingtanvir034
💥-Tanvir-💥 :
🖤🖤🖤
2026-08-15 11:18:30
0
mdforiduddinmasood
ফরিদ সেনেটারী এন্ড ইলেট্রিক :
🤗🤗🤗
2026-08-13 16:32:33
0
mdminhajmd60
Mdminhaj Md :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-08-13 11:33:19
0
sahariahasanjibon
𝗦𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝘀𝗮𝗻 :
🖤🖤🖤
2026-08-13 10:51:39
0
sadahmdtalha
𝙏𝘼𝙇𝙃𝘼?🪐 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-13 05:33:19
0
ripon.0130
Ꮢ Ꭵ Ꭾ Ꭷ Ꮑ :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-13 05:30:51
0
_5060tiktok.c1
👑 𝐕𝐎𝐈𝐂𝐄 ᵒᶠ 𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐔𝐅 👑 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-12 15:54:05
0
prince_ali037
✅সাপোর্ট করলে সাপোর্ট পাইবা ✅ :
❤️‍🩹❤️‍🩹❤️‍🩹💝💝💝💖💖💖
2026-08-12 15:51:26
1
To see more videos from user @abusalehkingdom, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Researchers John Spiesberger of the University of Pennsylvania and Eugene Terray of Woods Hole published the work in Physical Review E on August 18, 2026. It grew out of a practical problem: figuring out exactly where whales are by timing their calls with underwater microphones.  What they discovered A fin whale’s low-frequency call can be detected by a single hydrophone from roughly 100 km (62 miles) away. Normally, researchers assume that underwater sound is traveling at around 1,500 meters per second.  But Spiesberger’s calculations started producing bizarre results. Some whale sounds appeared to be traveling around 1,000 m/s, while others appeared to travel at 3,000 m/s or more — roughly twice the normal speed of sound in seawater. He initially assumed his computer program was broken. It wasn’t.  The culprit was something called temporal interference. Imagine a whale close to the ocean surface: Whale → hydrophone One portion of the call travels directly to the underwater microphone. Whale → surface → hydrophone Another portion travels upward, reflects off the ocean surface, and then reaches the same microphone slightly later. Those two versions of the same sound overlap. Because they’re slightly out of phase, they can interfere in such a way that the peak of the combined sound wave appears earlier than you’d expect.  So did the whale’s sound actually travel at 3,000 m/s? That’s the crucial part: not in the ordinary sense. The interference reshapes the combined wave. Its strongest energy peak can shift forward, making calculations based on that peak report an apparently “supersonic” propagation speed. Think of two overlapping ocean waves. Their interference can cause a new crest to suddenly appear farther ahead. That doesn’t mean a particular chunk of water raced from the old crest to the new one at enormous speed. The pattern moved because the waves combined differently. Something analogous is happening with the whale call. And this isn’t merely academic. If scientists assume the apparent arrival time represents ordinary sound propagation, their estimate of a whale’s location can be wrong by hundreds of meters.  And here’s where Einstein enters the story The researchers realized the same mathematics can apply to light. Under certain interference conditions, the peak/energy of a light wave could appear to reach a detector at a superluminal — faster-than-light — speed.  That sounds like Einstein has a problem. He doesn’t. Special relativity doesn’t simply say that nothing can ever appear to move faster than light. The critical restriction is that usable information cannot be transmitted faster than light in a way that violates causality. Spiesberger and Terray showed that although the energy peak can arrive apparently superluminally, determining that it arrived requires enough time that information still cannot be communicated faster than light.  #whale #Science #sound #animal #speed
Researchers John Spiesberger of the University of Pennsylvania and Eugene Terray of Woods Hole published the work in Physical Review E on August 18, 2026. It grew out of a practical problem: figuring out exactly where whales are by timing their calls with underwater microphones. What they discovered A fin whale’s low-frequency call can be detected by a single hydrophone from roughly 100 km (62 miles) away. Normally, researchers assume that underwater sound is traveling at around 1,500 meters per second. But Spiesberger’s calculations started producing bizarre results. Some whale sounds appeared to be traveling around 1,000 m/s, while others appeared to travel at 3,000 m/s or more — roughly twice the normal speed of sound in seawater. He initially assumed his computer program was broken. It wasn’t. The culprit was something called temporal interference. Imagine a whale close to the ocean surface: Whale → hydrophone One portion of the call travels directly to the underwater microphone. Whale → surface → hydrophone Another portion travels upward, reflects off the ocean surface, and then reaches the same microphone slightly later. Those two versions of the same sound overlap. Because they’re slightly out of phase, they can interfere in such a way that the peak of the combined sound wave appears earlier than you’d expect. So did the whale’s sound actually travel at 3,000 m/s? That’s the crucial part: not in the ordinary sense. The interference reshapes the combined wave. Its strongest energy peak can shift forward, making calculations based on that peak report an apparently “supersonic” propagation speed. Think of two overlapping ocean waves. Their interference can cause a new crest to suddenly appear farther ahead. That doesn’t mean a particular chunk of water raced from the old crest to the new one at enormous speed. The pattern moved because the waves combined differently. Something analogous is happening with the whale call. And this isn’t merely academic. If scientists assume the apparent arrival time represents ordinary sound propagation, their estimate of a whale’s location can be wrong by hundreds of meters. And here’s where Einstein enters the story The researchers realized the same mathematics can apply to light. Under certain interference conditions, the peak/energy of a light wave could appear to reach a detector at a superluminal — faster-than-light — speed. That sounds like Einstein has a problem. He doesn’t. Special relativity doesn’t simply say that nothing can ever appear to move faster than light. The critical restriction is that usable information cannot be transmitted faster than light in a way that violates causality. Spiesberger and Terray showed that although the energy peak can arrive apparently superluminally, determining that it arrived requires enough time that information still cannot be communicated faster than light. #whale #Science #sound #animal #speed

About