@die.linke.vr: Heidi am 25.08. von 13-15 Uhr in #stralsund. Danach von 15:30-17 Uhr mit Simone Oldenburg unserer Spitzenkandidatin zur #landtagswahl2026 #dielinke #dielinkemv #heidireichinnek

Die Linke Vorpommern-Rügen
Die Linke Vorpommern-Rügen
Open In TikTok:
Region: DE
Friday 14 August 2026 10:57:39 GMT
67689
2962
357
377

Music

Download

Comments

biene753
Carmen 😊 :
niemals würde ich diese drecks Regierung wählen
2026-08-15 08:28:07
250
user7639208163951
moni :
Ohne mich
2026-08-14 22:50:06
56
turbotwins_rene5
turbotwins_rene :
Armes Stralsund
2026-08-14 21:44:40
171
tasso.stein
Tasso Stein :
3x nein
2026-08-15 05:22:28
43
frediderkoelschejung
Fredi❤️🐐🤍 :
Wo ist der Verfassungsschutz
2026-08-15 16:36:31
16
mandythorandt
user196993963145 :
Furchtbar 😢 geht gar nicht
2026-08-15 14:29:54
19
thomas19921
@tomystiktok :
Ja gegen euch
2026-08-15 02:33:00
13
harko8054
Harko :
hallo Heidi was macht der A8?
2026-08-15 11:59:14
23
unionolli
Unionolli :
Die singen gegen sich selbst. Respekt. 😉
2026-08-16 08:16:07
22
sunny_moonchild1.0
𝐄𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚 ☾ :
Wir freuen uns auf die Badieee 💚💚💚161💚💚💚
2026-08-14 15:29:40
48
alex_elektrik1
alex_elektrik :
bewahre Gott von Sozialismus!
2026-08-14 18:41:15
51
mobbyboy0
mobbyboy :
Einer schlimmsten Part denk bitte dran, wer für den Stromausfall verantwortlich war in Berlin
2026-08-14 18:17:41
30
alabaelias0
Joanna :
😂😂🤣für mich echt nur zum Lachen
2026-08-15 11:29:17
7
steps2326
Steps :
Oh mein Gott
2026-08-15 13:50:23
34
iriskreft82
iriskreft82 :
Oh mein Gott
2026-08-15 11:42:00
17
nylon28
Nylon28 :
furchtbar 😠
2026-08-15 07:02:00
7
userbhktjvj5qc
Tom :
Gegen was? Gegen unsere Regierung? das wäre sinnvoll
2026-08-15 22:15:10
21
petzehexe
Petra-Kerstin :
Diesen Mist werde ich mir garantiert nicht antun
2026-08-14 16:28:51
10
lemmy67052
Lemmy67 :
wann geht die Demo gegen Links an?wäre dadei
2026-08-14 19:18:18
13
mtzos18
Mätzos :
Oh Gott🙈🙈
2026-08-14 19:26:44
9
To see more videos from user @die.linke.vr, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Why “asking ten people” can kill an idea •	Dilution of vision: When you solicit broad opinions before you’ve clarified your core hypothesis, you get ten different directions and end up with a compromised, generic version. •	Premature optimization: Early feedback often focuses on surface details (wording, colors, edge cases) instead of whether the underlying problem and solution are worth pursuing. •	Social risk aversion: People tend to point out risks more than possibilities, especially if they’re not invested in your success. That skews the signal toward “why this won’t work.” •	Decision paralysis: Conflicting advice creates uncertainty, which leads to endless tweaking instead of shipping a testable version. When asking people helps instead of hurts The problem isn’t feedback; it’s unstructured, premature, and unfocused feedback. •	Ask the right people: Talk to people who actually experience the problem you’re solving, not just colleagues or friends who want to be helpful. •	Ask at the right time: •	Very early: test the problem and value proposition (“Does this matter to you?”). •	Mid-stage: test usability and clarity (“Can you do X without help?”). •	Later: test pricing, positioning, and scale. •	Ask the right questions: •	“What’s the last time you faced this problem?” •	“How do you solve it now?” •	“What would make this 10x better?”   Avoid “Do you like this idea?” which invites polite, low-signal answers. A better pattern than “ask ten people” Instead of “ask ten people what they think,” try: 1.	Write a one-paragraph hypothesis: •	Who has the problem? •	What is the problem? •	What is your proposed solution? •	What would count as success? 2.	Talk to 3–5 target users with that hypothesis in mind, focusing on their behavior and pain, not your solution’s features. 3.	Look for patterns, not opinions: If multiple people independently describe the same pain and current workaround, that’s a strong signal. 4.	Decide, then test: Make a clear decision based on patterns, then run a small experiment (landing page, prototype, pilot) instead of re-opening the debate.
Why “asking ten people” can kill an idea • Dilution of vision: When you solicit broad opinions before you’ve clarified your core hypothesis, you get ten different directions and end up with a compromised, generic version. • Premature optimization: Early feedback often focuses on surface details (wording, colors, edge cases) instead of whether the underlying problem and solution are worth pursuing. • Social risk aversion: People tend to point out risks more than possibilities, especially if they’re not invested in your success. That skews the signal toward “why this won’t work.” • Decision paralysis: Conflicting advice creates uncertainty, which leads to endless tweaking instead of shipping a testable version. When asking people helps instead of hurts The problem isn’t feedback; it’s unstructured, premature, and unfocused feedback. • Ask the right people: Talk to people who actually experience the problem you’re solving, not just colleagues or friends who want to be helpful. • Ask at the right time: • Very early: test the problem and value proposition (“Does this matter to you?”). • Mid-stage: test usability and clarity (“Can you do X without help?”). • Later: test pricing, positioning, and scale. • Ask the right questions: • “What’s the last time you faced this problem?” • “How do you solve it now?” • “What would make this 10x better?” Avoid “Do you like this idea?” which invites polite, low-signal answers. A better pattern than “ask ten people” Instead of “ask ten people what they think,” try: 1. Write a one-paragraph hypothesis: • Who has the problem? • What is the problem? • What is your proposed solution? • What would count as success? 2. Talk to 3–5 target users with that hypothesis in mind, focusing on their behavior and pain, not your solution’s features. 3. Look for patterns, not opinions: If multiple people independently describe the same pain and current workaround, that’s a strong signal. 4. Decide, then test: Make a clear decision based on patterns, then run a small experiment (landing page, prototype, pilot) instead of re-opening the debate.

About