zozoghalayinigaza🇵🇸
Region: DE
Friday 14 August 2026 12:31:14 GMT
635
158
18
82
Music
Download
Comments
dear sis💖 :
May Allah bless you 🍀
2026-09-09 02:41:02
0
:
hi
2026-08-14 12:34:12
2
kbenskiy🇵🇸 :
1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-08-15 17:38:05
0
lyric✌🏼 :
@kbenskiy🇵🇸:1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.,hellooooo
2026-09-03 14:06:23
0
hadiya🦦 :
I support you
2026-08-14 14:48:09
0
Anna :
1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.,hellooooo
2026-09-05 09:27:37
0
Ziane free pales :
free palestine 🥰🥰
2026-08-20 21:06:10
0
𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐡 :
coeurs
2026-08-14 14:03:21
0
bosnie :
vive la palestine🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲avec vous🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
2026-08-14 14:16:22
0
hadiya🦦 :
What is your favourite colour??
2026-08-14 14:48:14
0
:
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN88PQs4J/
2026-08-14 13:45:26
0
ᴢᴀʜᴀʀᴀ(ᴏᴍᴀʀ's ᴠᴇʀsɪᴏɴ)⸆⸉🍉 :
what's yall fav fruit?
2026-09-05 08:48:58
0
noom :
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGdxsjHYx/
2026-08-24 04:41:00
0
noom :
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGdxsApF4/
2026-08-24 04:38:17
0
Rabia💓💓 :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-08-14 12:34:23
2
ÝAZMELIKE :
🤲🤲🤲
2026-09-03 14:06:26
0
samirparis75🇩🇿🇨🇵 :
👍👍👍
2026-08-24 07:38:37
0
To see more videos from user @zozoghalayinigaza, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
