@lesverts.faf: DON’T WORRY, OUR LADIES ARE DZ WARRIORS TOO! 🇩🇿🔥

Équipe d'Algérie de football
Équipe d'Algérie de football
Open In TikTok:
Region: DZ
Sunday 16 August 2026 01:20:06 GMT
1146702
201072
3449
4174

Music

Download

Comments

hamza.medjadj
Hamza Gentleman 🇬🇧 :
فالكرة كاين الرابح وكاين المغرب😂
2026-08-16 11:43:13
992
mohamedzaied40
Mohamed Zaied :
خاوه خاوه ❤️🇪🇬 🥰 🇩🇿
2026-08-18 09:51:12
0
adam2goated2
adam2goated! :
We let u win😭😭
2026-08-17 17:14:50
0
boussaha.lina
Lina Boussaha :
Best moments 🥹❤️💚🤍
2026-08-18 03:59:22
0
reda02250sg
ReRe :
The Algerians warriors wow ❤️🥰
2026-08-16 14:19:55
2
mohammed.mekideche
Mohammed Mekideche :
افرحوا اني رايح نغسل المواعين ونسيق الكوزينة 😆
2026-08-16 01:31:01
414
mohammed.moh.l6
Mohamed Moh :
My sincere greetings
2026-08-18 02:20:14
0
ccbyceline
CELINE✨ :
Well done girls 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻 💕💕💕
2026-08-16 14:46:17
1
soso19tchan
Safia :
لاماه مانحتفلوش بالفريق النسائي كيف مانحتفلو بالفريق الرجالي؟
2026-08-16 19:51:48
110
moumou.kherbache
Mohamed 09 :
علاش يا زيدان علاش ضركة كفاش علي سعدي نتعلم نفتل طعام ولا كفاش
2026-08-16 11:47:02
78
dedal_g
Dédal :
الجزائر هي بلادي و كامل يسكنوا في فرنسا...
2026-08-16 01:27:22
130
solider.kader
solider kader :
خلقنا رب العالمين للمكرة ههههه
2026-08-17 13:47:42
7
akrams016
𝑨𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒎 :
ناس دات دراهم ولي تفرج واش ربح؟؟
2026-08-16 11:31:06
15
lila09_09
lilouche :
bravo les filles elles jouent mieux que les hommes 😂
2026-08-16 07:45:22
2653
username218430
فِـــراس🫆 :
سيريو شكون يفرح ب 3rd place😂؟
2026-08-16 01:27:45
14
safwan0586
OUSSAMA. 13 🇲🇦⚽ :
بالصحة والراحة اليوم لك واليوم عليك تستاهلو 🇲🇦🇩🇿
2026-08-16 12:54:10
25
barek.idem
M'Barek :
Juste pour une 3 ème place, c est pas pour une coupe.
2026-08-16 13:22:31
5
To see more videos from user @lesverts.faf, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Judge DENIES Lil Durk’s Motion To Suppress Phone Evidence Last night, DJ Akademiks broke down the legal battle over a phone seized from Lil Durk during a 2021 investigation. Today, the judge officially ruled on the issue — and Durk’s motion to suppress was denied. ⚖️ WHAT THE JUDGE DECIDED The court ruled that Exhibit 200 is admissible, meaning prosecutors can use the evidence obtained from the phone. According to the ruling, even if there were problems with the GBI’s original seizure or retention of the phone, the FBI’s later searches were conducted under separate warrants and were sufficiently independent from the original seizure. The government also argued that the 2021 warrant authorized investigators to preserve a digital copy of electronic data for potential future use. 📱 WHY THE PHONE MATTERS The phone was originally seized following a July 11, 2021 incident at Durk Banks’ Georgia residence. Investigators reportedly found evidence of gunfire at the home, including spent shell casings and multiple firearms. The government also says Durk acknowledged firing his weapon several times as suspected intruders fled. The defense argued that law enforcement couldn’t simply hold onto the phone for years and later use it for an entirely different federal investigation. The government countered that the FBI’s later investigation was independent and that agents obtained their own warrant based on probable cause. 👀 AND HERE’S WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING… According to the government’s description of the phone evidence, investigators found screenshots of messages concerning “TL” and his release on bond, as well as information regarding the location where he would be placed on house arrest. The government also referenced other screenshots and social-media information that it says became relevant to its broader investigation. 🧩 THE BIG LEGAL QUESTION Durk’s argument was essentially: You can’t seize my phone for one investigation, keep it for years, and then use it for a completely different case. The government’s response was essentially: The original seizure was lawful, the data was preserved pursuant to the warrant, and the FBI later obtained an independent warrant based on its own probable cause. The judge ultimately sided with the government on the suppression issue. 🚨 BOTTOM LINE The phone evidence will not be suppressed based on the arguments presented in this motion. That does NOT mean the court has found Durk guilty or that every piece of information on the phone automatically proves the government’s allegations. It means the judge has ruled that Exhibit 200 can be admitted into evidence, allowing prosecutors to use it as the case moves forward. 👀 This could be a significant development in the federal case.
🚨 BREAKING: Judge DENIES Lil Durk’s Motion To Suppress Phone Evidence Last night, DJ Akademiks broke down the legal battle over a phone seized from Lil Durk during a 2021 investigation. Today, the judge officially ruled on the issue — and Durk’s motion to suppress was denied. ⚖️ WHAT THE JUDGE DECIDED The court ruled that Exhibit 200 is admissible, meaning prosecutors can use the evidence obtained from the phone. According to the ruling, even if there were problems with the GBI’s original seizure or retention of the phone, the FBI’s later searches were conducted under separate warrants and were sufficiently independent from the original seizure. The government also argued that the 2021 warrant authorized investigators to preserve a digital copy of electronic data for potential future use. 📱 WHY THE PHONE MATTERS The phone was originally seized following a July 11, 2021 incident at Durk Banks’ Georgia residence. Investigators reportedly found evidence of gunfire at the home, including spent shell casings and multiple firearms. The government also says Durk acknowledged firing his weapon several times as suspected intruders fled. The defense argued that law enforcement couldn’t simply hold onto the phone for years and later use it for an entirely different federal investigation. The government countered that the FBI’s later investigation was independent and that agents obtained their own warrant based on probable cause. 👀 AND HERE’S WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING… According to the government’s description of the phone evidence, investigators found screenshots of messages concerning “TL” and his release on bond, as well as information regarding the location where he would be placed on house arrest. The government also referenced other screenshots and social-media information that it says became relevant to its broader investigation. 🧩 THE BIG LEGAL QUESTION Durk’s argument was essentially: You can’t seize my phone for one investigation, keep it for years, and then use it for a completely different case. The government’s response was essentially: The original seizure was lawful, the data was preserved pursuant to the warrant, and the FBI later obtained an independent warrant based on its own probable cause. The judge ultimately sided with the government on the suppression issue. 🚨 BOTTOM LINE The phone evidence will not be suppressed based on the arguments presented in this motion. That does NOT mean the court has found Durk guilty or that every piece of information on the phone automatically proves the government’s allegations. It means the judge has ruled that Exhibit 200 can be admitted into evidence, allowing prosecutors to use it as the case moves forward. 👀 This could be a significant development in the federal case.

About