@user8269220027166:

نور اليقين
نور اليقين
Open In TikTok:
Region: DZ
Sunday 16 August 2026 12:48:47 GMT
3963
112
6
84

Music

Download

Comments

houaraci1pj
ŴÃĹĎ ṂỖŜŤÃ 27 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-16 12:55:24
1
fleur.blanche3172
Fleur Blanche :
😭😭😭
2026-08-16 15:32:13
1
zakaria.zd13
Zakaria Zd :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-08-16 13:26:23
1
user8269220027166
نور اليقين :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-08-16 12:49:34
3
To see more videos from user @user8269220027166, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#Plato really didn't like #democracy because he thought that it would always, inevitably, lead to mob rule. He thought that eventually, anyone who could actually govern well would have to bow to the unreasonable whims of the mass.  Plato compared a democracy to a ship. Imagine that there is a ship run by a captain who's ‘deaf and short sighted.’ He's not very good. And so, the crew start to think they can do better. They say things like, ‘Navigation is easy! Anyone can run a ship!’ They jostle to take over. They fight and scheme to become captain. But of course, navigation isn't easy. And not everybody can be a captain. And so, the ship is destroyed.  The ancient Greeks believed that all types of #government have their faults.  A #monarchy will create a cruel tyrant, which will give rise to an aristocracy which will turn corrupt and self-serving. This will create a democracy which will lead to a mob rule, which creates #anarchy . And we go back to a monarchy.  But for the ancient Greek historian Polybius, a perfect government has to combine elements of each. You have to have a monarchy, like a consul or a president; an aristocracy, like a #senate ; and a democracy like a parliament or #Congress . A long time later, the #FoundingFathers of #America agreed with Polybius and modelled their constitution on ideas like it.  Plato and Aristotle argued that all parts of government should agree, but #Polybius and the Founding Fathers argued that a kind of creative disagreement was hugely important. We need rival voices in rival parts of government offering rival ideas if democracy is to stay relevant. #politics #civic #philosophy
#Plato really didn't like #democracy because he thought that it would always, inevitably, lead to mob rule. He thought that eventually, anyone who could actually govern well would have to bow to the unreasonable whims of the mass. Plato compared a democracy to a ship. Imagine that there is a ship run by a captain who's ‘deaf and short sighted.’ He's not very good. And so, the crew start to think they can do better. They say things like, ‘Navigation is easy! Anyone can run a ship!’ They jostle to take over. They fight and scheme to become captain. But of course, navigation isn't easy. And not everybody can be a captain. And so, the ship is destroyed. The ancient Greeks believed that all types of #government have their faults. A #monarchy will create a cruel tyrant, which will give rise to an aristocracy which will turn corrupt and self-serving. This will create a democracy which will lead to a mob rule, which creates #anarchy . And we go back to a monarchy. But for the ancient Greek historian Polybius, a perfect government has to combine elements of each. You have to have a monarchy, like a consul or a president; an aristocracy, like a #senate ; and a democracy like a parliament or #Congress . A long time later, the #FoundingFathers of #America agreed with Polybius and modelled their constitution on ideas like it. Plato and Aristotle argued that all parts of government should agree, but #Polybius and the Founding Fathers argued that a kind of creative disagreement was hugely important. We need rival voices in rival parts of government offering rival ideas if democracy is to stay relevant. #politics #civic #philosophy

About