@judeanderling: I don't know If the change made was great, 'cause the craving remains the same 🖤 #judebellingham #erlinghaaland #haalingham #haalandxbellingham

。 𝒜𝓁  。
。 𝒜𝓁 。
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Monday 17 August 2026 03:23:58 GMT
67926
15388
79
717

Music

Download

Comments

thakoumi
Thakoumi :
I think they argued a lot about this. I have a feeling Erling went to Man city cz of his Dad and tried to persuade Jude to move with him to England but Jude didn't want to play in England.
2026-08-17 17:49:26
823
kein.girl5
Kein Girl :
why did he bring England into the conversation 😂
2026-08-18 23:07:49
24
heroicpug
اروزه :
he got a bit nervous after the question
2026-08-17 10:39:45
1231
sustaitadiana
Le Diana 🪩 :
What if they were living togheter in Germány, remember they were alone at the time and maybe erling was like ok i have to go to England is a better place to live jude, and jude was like noo stay here with me and Erling decide to Move on they knew jude knew it was over over for them 😫😫😫😫
2026-08-17 16:12:00
194
nangisajabolega
✨ :
jude definitely begged him to stay good god i'm not strong enough for this
2026-08-19 12:40:38
55
kiszqk
Bbi ⭕️ :
This reminded me of a fic 😭 man why the FUCK are they canonising the fics 😭😭😭💔💔💔💔
2026-08-18 13:29:45
95
gi39194
゚。⋆☁️₊ 𝒢𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓁𝓁 ₊✧˚.🦋 :
He didn't give anything away 😂 He totally beat around the bush, so you just know that private chat was messy. We all know Erling was begging him to move to Manchester, so him bringing up England was definitely a hint about joining forces later 😂😂 Jude clearly had other plans though.
2026-08-17 16:05:22
197
owouvux
★ :
agree with the comments that he seemed nervous and tried to tone it down 😔 it seems like a complicated conversation they had, and the fact that he mentioned "england as a country" makes me think of the rumors that jude and his family didn't want him to play in england (not the nicest to black players), plus the fact that mancity is erling's goal and the rumor that real madrid was interested in him but backed out because of another signing
2026-08-18 05:11:53
61
stedys3
Stedys3 :
Why did you throw a brick at me????
2026-08-17 23:55:40
87
yanjjy7
yanjjy :
Imaging for those follow them from the beginning and had to live through the divorce, not knowing whether they would keep in touch or not
2026-08-19 04:12:55
12
randobyte
userC41E :
the fact that the interviewer asked abt jude opinion on him leaving the club was like— they are THAT obvious huh?
2026-08-19 01:26:44
12
To see more videos from user @judeanderling, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Cold Winters Theory. The Cold Winters Theory is a controversial evolutionary hypothesis associated most prominently with psychologist Richard Lynn, which attempts to explain differences in average cognitive-test performance among human populations by proposing that living in colder, more seasonal environments created stronger pressures for planning, problem-solving, foresight, and other cognitive skills. The basic argument is that humans who migrated from warmer regions into northern Eurasia encountered a more demanding seasonal environment: winters could limit the availability of food, require people to preserve and store resources, and make adequate clothing, shelter, heating, and coordinated hunting necessary for survival. According to the theory, these challenges may have favored individuals who were better able to anticipate future conditions and solve novel problems, with such traits supposedly becoming more common over many generations. Proponents have pointed to correlations between temperature and national-level intelligence-test scores, as well as archaeological observations that technological and behavioral complexity sometimes increased in colder environments, as evidence that environmental difficulty could have played a role in human cognitive evolution. However, these observations do not establish that cold winters caused differences in cognitive ability, and the theory remains highly disputed. One major problem is that correlations between climate and test scores can have many alternative explanations, including differences in education, nutrition, disease burden, wealth, political institutions, migration, urbanization, and the quality and cultural comparability of intelligence testing. Indeed, research examining temperature and intelligence within the United States has found that temperature can correlate with test scores even when racial composition is controlled, a finding that illustrates an important limitation of the theory: evolutionary selection cannot easily explain differences among populations whose ancestors have not undergone sufficiently different evolutionary histories in the relevant environment. Another difficulty is that human societies have repeatedly demonstrated sophisticated technological, agricultural, mathematical, architectural, and political achievements in warm and tropical environments, while extremely cold environments have not automatically produced the most technologically or economically advanced societies. This makes it difficult to treat temperature alone as a general measure of environmental challenge. Furthermore, the theory can be criticized for assuming that humans respond to environmental difficulty primarily through genetic evolution in cognitive ability when cultural adaptation is extraordinarily important; people can respond to winter through cooperation, food storage, clothing, architecture, agriculture, technology, and accumulated knowledge without requiring substantial genetic changes in intelligence. The theory is also controversial because some versions have been used to interpret racial differences in intelligence, which makes careful separation of empirical evidence from broader assumptions about race especially important. A more cautious interpretation is that seasonality and environmental variability may have influenced the kinds of skills, technologies, and social institutions that human populations developed, but that is considerably different from claiming that cold climates straightforwardly made particular populations more intelligent.  Whats your thoughts on Cold Winters Theory?  #iq #Ethnic #xyzabc #tlpur#fyp
Cold Winters Theory. The Cold Winters Theory is a controversial evolutionary hypothesis associated most prominently with psychologist Richard Lynn, which attempts to explain differences in average cognitive-test performance among human populations by proposing that living in colder, more seasonal environments created stronger pressures for planning, problem-solving, foresight, and other cognitive skills. The basic argument is that humans who migrated from warmer regions into northern Eurasia encountered a more demanding seasonal environment: winters could limit the availability of food, require people to preserve and store resources, and make adequate clothing, shelter, heating, and coordinated hunting necessary for survival. According to the theory, these challenges may have favored individuals who were better able to anticipate future conditions and solve novel problems, with such traits supposedly becoming more common over many generations. Proponents have pointed to correlations between temperature and national-level intelligence-test scores, as well as archaeological observations that technological and behavioral complexity sometimes increased in colder environments, as evidence that environmental difficulty could have played a role in human cognitive evolution. However, these observations do not establish that cold winters caused differences in cognitive ability, and the theory remains highly disputed. One major problem is that correlations between climate and test scores can have many alternative explanations, including differences in education, nutrition, disease burden, wealth, political institutions, migration, urbanization, and the quality and cultural comparability of intelligence testing. Indeed, research examining temperature and intelligence within the United States has found that temperature can correlate with test scores even when racial composition is controlled, a finding that illustrates an important limitation of the theory: evolutionary selection cannot easily explain differences among populations whose ancestors have not undergone sufficiently different evolutionary histories in the relevant environment. Another difficulty is that human societies have repeatedly demonstrated sophisticated technological, agricultural, mathematical, architectural, and political achievements in warm and tropical environments, while extremely cold environments have not automatically produced the most technologically or economically advanced societies. This makes it difficult to treat temperature alone as a general measure of environmental challenge. Furthermore, the theory can be criticized for assuming that humans respond to environmental difficulty primarily through genetic evolution in cognitive ability when cultural adaptation is extraordinarily important; people can respond to winter through cooperation, food storage, clothing, architecture, agriculture, technology, and accumulated knowledge without requiring substantial genetic changes in intelligence. The theory is also controversial because some versions have been used to interpret racial differences in intelligence, which makes careful separation of empirical evidence from broader assumptions about race especially important. A more cautious interpretation is that seasonality and environmental variability may have influenced the kinds of skills, technologies, and social institutions that human populations developed, but that is considerably different from claiming that cold climates straightforwardly made particular populations more intelligent. Whats your thoughts on Cold Winters Theory? #iq #Ethnic #xyzabc #tlpur#fyp

About