1. Home
  2. Detail

@dungcucamtay06: Cưa 12" lam nhỏ Yamasu, cs 1200W, tốc xíc 25m/s cực mạnh, tặng vali hộp đựng và 2sợi xíc 1/4, tra nhớt tự động #maycuaxich #maycuapin #maycuago #cuapin #muataitiktok

Vũ Trọk
Vũ Trọk
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Monday 17 August 2026 05:02:07 GMT
1014
6
0
5

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (40.13MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (40.13MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @dungcucamtay06, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Gaenslen’s Test is one for a dysfunction of the SI joint. This test came from a paper by Dr. Frederick Gaenslen in 1927 (GAENSLEN FJ. SACRO-ILIAC ARTHRODESIS: INDICATIONS, AUTHOR'S TECHNIC AND END-RESULTS. JAMA. 1927;89(24):2031–2035. doi:10.1001/jama.1927.02690240023008) where he describes a way to differentiate pain coming from the sacroiliac joint or the lumbar spine, and likewise, is it on the left or right. How to perform the test -Have the patient lay supine on a table, near the edge -Place the affected leg off the table then passively flex the non affected hip -You may ask the patient to hold their knee -Stabilize the the pelvis and apply a passive downward pressure to the affected (tested) leg -You may apply an upward force to the flexed leg A positive is pain in the SI joint area As for the reliability of the test, there is a mix of information. A paper in 2000 (Van der Wurff, P., Hagmeijer, R. H. M., & Meyne, W. (2000). Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Manual therapy, 5(1), 30-36.) references a study from 1994 by Mark Laslett (Laslett, M., & Williams, M. (1994). The reliability of selected pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint pathology. Spine, 19(11), 1243-1249.) , which found the test to be reliable so that conclusion is made. However, in a later paper by Laslett in 2005 (Laslett, M., Aprill, C. N., McDonald, B., & Young, S. B. (2005). Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Manual therapy, 10(3), 207-218), he found that the sensitivity is 37%, specificity is 71% for it. Then in 2020 another paper found the sensitivity to be 61.5% and the specificity to be 33.3% (Nejati, P., Sartaj, E., Imani, F., Moeineddin, R., Nejati, L., & Safavi, M. (2020). Accuracy of the Diagnostic Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 19(1), 28–37). What it seems to look like is this test is best performed with a cluster of other tests and when things like the FABER and thigh thrust test. What do you think about this test? Do you use it? Think it’s a good test? Let me know in the comments. #orthopedics #physio #physicaltherapy #SIJoint #SIJPain
Gaenslen’s Test is one for a dysfunction of the SI joint. This test came from a paper by Dr. Frederick Gaenslen in 1927 (GAENSLEN FJ. SACRO-ILIAC ARTHRODESIS: INDICATIONS, AUTHOR'S TECHNIC AND END-RESULTS. JAMA. 1927;89(24):2031–2035. doi:10.1001/jama.1927.02690240023008) where he describes a way to differentiate pain coming from the sacroiliac joint or the lumbar spine, and likewise, is it on the left or right. How to perform the test -Have the patient lay supine on a table, near the edge -Place the affected leg off the table then passively flex the non affected hip -You may ask the patient to hold their knee -Stabilize the the pelvis and apply a passive downward pressure to the affected (tested) leg -You may apply an upward force to the flexed leg A positive is pain in the SI joint area As for the reliability of the test, there is a mix of information. A paper in 2000 (Van der Wurff, P., Hagmeijer, R. H. M., & Meyne, W. (2000). Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Manual therapy, 5(1), 30-36.) references a study from 1994 by Mark Laslett (Laslett, M., & Williams, M. (1994). The reliability of selected pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint pathology. Spine, 19(11), 1243-1249.) , which found the test to be reliable so that conclusion is made. However, in a later paper by Laslett in 2005 (Laslett, M., Aprill, C. N., McDonald, B., & Young, S. B. (2005). Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Manual therapy, 10(3), 207-218), he found that the sensitivity is 37%, specificity is 71% for it. Then in 2020 another paper found the sensitivity to be 61.5% and the specificity to be 33.3% (Nejati, P., Sartaj, E., Imani, F., Moeineddin, R., Nejati, L., & Safavi, M. (2020). Accuracy of the Diagnostic Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 19(1), 28–37). What it seems to look like is this test is best performed with a cluster of other tests and when things like the FABER and thigh thrust test. What do you think about this test? Do you use it? Think it’s a good test? Let me know in the comments. #orthopedics #physio #physicaltherapy #SIJoint #SIJPain


جو حیاتِ نبی دے ہین منکر 🍁😔🥀🖤#صلی_اللہ_علیه_وآله_وسلم #foryoupage #foryou #fypシ゚
جو حیاتِ نبی دے ہین منکر 🍁😔🥀🖤#صلی_اللہ_علیه_وآله_وسلم #foryoupage #foryou #fypシ゚


J'ai de flashback d'nous deux tard la night...des flashback #rapfrancais🇫🇷 #gazo #fave #republication #whatsappstatus
J'ai de flashback d'nous deux tard la night...des flashback #rapfrancais🇫🇷 #gazo #fave #republication #whatsappstatus
Film Paket Santet Tayang 27 Agustus Di Bioskop ‼️ 🎬 #filmpaketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #paketsantet #fikinaki #fadlyfaisal #yasaminjasem #filmhoror #fakesituation⚠️ #fakebodyy⚠️ #fyp #xyzbca
Film Paket Santet Tayang 27 Agustus Di Bioskop ‼️ 🎬 #filmpaketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #paketsantet #fikinaki #fadlyfaisal #yasaminjasem #filmhoror #fakesituation⚠️ #fakebodyy⚠️ #fyp #xyzbca

About

Legal