Lindi Michelle 🇦🇺 🇺🇸 :
Once you make women’s sexual behaviour itself a moral problem, you create a framework in which their consent becomes secondary to whether or not you think they’re behaving correctly.
In my comment i’m talking about women’s agency, consent, coercion and protection. You’re responding by telling women that sex is morally wrong unless it’s within what you deem a suitable arrangement.
Moralising women’s sexuality has been both the basis for, and a major mechanism of, bypassing women’s consent.
And you say that this depends on your morals, values and beliefs, but what you’re actually indicating in your video is that your particular morals and values are that women don’t get to choose for themselves. You’re supporting the same framework you’re questioning in the sex industry: a framework where someone else gets to decide what women should and shouldn’t do with their own bodies.
You also don't specify which God you're talking about. If you're referring to the God of Abraham, then let's actually look at the texts you're invoking as your objective authority on women's sexuality. There are numerous examples of women being treated as property, women's consent being bypassed, women being taken as wives, and sexual access to women being permitted & prescribed by male religious authority. (aka pimps).
So invoking the God of Abraham as the objective authority on what is morally acceptable for women's sexuality is, to put it mildly, a very strange choice. You're invoking a moral framework with its own history of subordinating women's sexual autonomy and then using that framework to tell women what they should and shouldn't do with their bodies.
So, well done, girl. Probably the most disturbing part is that the agency that was taken from you, you’re now teaching other women to surrender to a framework that also puts decisions about what they do with their bodies in the hands of men. Good job 😂
2026-08-17 11:13:53