Blake | NARC
Region: US
Tuesday 18 August 2026 21:37:59 GMT
151345
6999
93
169
Music
Download
Comments
ahigbldk :
who only sprays for 0.25s
2026-08-18 22:29:11
1600
NielsFeys :
thats why you need a "calories per 100g" too
2026-08-19 09:27:04
223
Colton De'Angelo :
Soo… 3447 calories for the whole bottle 💀
2026-08-19 00:07:40
184
Jewbaru natsuki :
3447 calories in one bottle is wild
2026-08-19 00:28:13
477
David Lister :
rounding isn't the issue, it's only labeling nutritional value per serving size and not per 100g
2026-08-19 08:35:37
51
VanillaCoke :
theyre marketting this as a fat free, calorie free oil 😭
2026-08-18 23:27:25
182
Sally :
This is crazy to me, in Ireland it tells us the exact calories 🤣
2026-08-18 21:45:50
25
jfuns :
What if you spray for 5 seconds lol
2026-08-18 23:11:41
35
65486 :
What’s your opinion on this? 25gram is 101 calories and 20grams protein
2026-08-18 21:49:08
6
Seo Eun-Hyun :
tic-tacs are 100% sugar but they can market themselves as 0 sugar since they round it
2026-08-19 08:22:34
8
Arthur :
in the uk, there is nutritional value per 100g as well as per serving to avoid this
2026-08-19 11:39:54
12
Yan Ade :
bro as someone who needs to watch their saturated fats. the difference between 0 and 0.5 DOES make a difference and i WOULD like to know the exact amount...
2026-08-19 00:28:36
8
duckcnady :
w bulking strat
2026-08-19 00:39:15
3
rio :
Where is the lab grown meat mukbang
2026-08-19 07:29:33
2
wubu :
why do you round for this at all
2026-08-19 14:00:54
1
Jacob Wilson :
how the hell is there 380 seconds worth of spray??
2026-08-19 08:52:19
1
VibingGhost :
This is why the EU standardizes their labels to 100g of product which must be displayed, it eliminates the ambiguity of the situation. Sprays can opt to declare <.5g of fat on their label per serving but the calorie mark per serving will reflect the 2 calories you get. EU rules make the situation clearer and less misleading but they have many downfalls that US labels encourage. Each of the labels are around the same in effect but the EU label prevents misleading labeling while the US label encourages visual and often micronutrients transparency advantages at the cost of edge situations where manufacturers may be misleading with the serving sizes of their products.
2026-08-19 17:41:32
1
🇵🇸🩺 :
i don’t understand how you’re for this? they’re clearly exploiting the serving size to make it appear as 0 calories, when an actual serving size would bring it up to 20-30 calories based off of the assumption that it’s 0
2026-08-19 10:08:30
1
Chirov :
This is such a nothing problem. If you use the spray as intended it is functionally zero calories added to a meal. Be mad at something consequential.
2026-08-19 02:36:08
8
ily.chalk :
yeah but the problem is the quarter second spray time😭. It should say like by the second and say 10 cals
2026-08-19 22:21:26
1
No Food Fear :
if they didn't want you to know, then they wouldn't make the rounding rules they have available to know
2026-08-19 00:21:28
1
Victor :
3447 kcal in the bottle
2026-08-19 04:15:00
3
Helmet098 :
Tic tacs are zero per mint so like 200 for a bottle with 100. it's cheating. should be required to say the whole container macros
2026-08-19 10:51:20
1
Philip Ruo :
It's labels like these that remind you that serving sizes are made up.
2026-08-19 13:22:03
2
snorpreturns :
that shouldnt be a thing
2026-08-19 00:11:51
3
To see more videos from user @thenutritionnarc, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
