Asked & Answered ⚖️
Region: US
Wednesday 19 August 2026 01:37:12 GMT
47704
5261
590
316
Music
Download
Comments
Durb :
I’m wondering… if her admission is the “smoking gun” so to speak of this case, why are the prosecutors so afraid of the jury hearing it AND why would there still be so much testimony left. Wouldn’t you want to end with “she confessed and this was her mental state at the time”
2026-08-19 12:32:03
0
user9613861119662 :
I’ve completely changed my mind about Reddington’s strategy. I honestly thought he was deliberately planting seeds throughout the trial to eventually challenge whether Lindsay actually killed the children and possibly point the finger elsewhere. But after watching how he’s examined the defence witnesses, I don’t think that’s his plan at all. He must be aware of the inconsistencies and unanswered questions in Patrick’s account and the problems with the timeline. Yet when he’s had opportunities to really pursue them, he hasn’t. He didn’t use Laposata to properly explore how long Lindsay may have been outside, whether the physical sequence could fit the available time, or how long three separate strangulations could realistically take. He hasn’t used the digital evidence to comprehensively reconstruct Patrick’s movements, calls or location either. Instead, everything he’s doing points in one direction: Lindsay’s severe mental deterioration, psychosis, medication changes, suicidality, hallucinations and the fact she was repeatedly asking for help. I now think Reddington has deliberately taken what he considers the safest legal route to an acquittal. Rather than gamble everything on trying to convince a jury that Lindsay didn’t physically kill the children, he is effectively saying: even if you accept that Lindsay did this, the evidence shows she was so profoundly mentally ill that she was not criminally responsible for her actions. That also explains why he isn’t attacking Patrick as aggressively as I expected. Trying to introduce Patrick as an alternative perpetrator could distract from the insanity defence and potentially leave the jury thinking the defence itself doesn’t know what happened. Reddington only needs one route to reasonable doubt on criminal responsibility, and he clearly believes the psychiatric evidence is the strongest and least risky route. And when you consider the stakes, I can understand it more now. If that defence fails, Lindsay is facing the possibility of spending the rest of her life in prison.
2026-08-19 07:57:49
62
Ren🎀 :
Is it possible Red didn't object to the bands being tied/not tied because will bring it up at a later time?
2026-08-19 12:34:07
1
Laura 🇨🇦 :
I did find it very interesting the wording Ziezel and Red used. “She told him she heard a male voice telling her to do it” Never said she did it. Reasonable doubt !!
2026-08-19 01:59:12
366
clingalingadingdong :
I thought it was interesting that while Dr. Laposata was talking about the injuries each person suffered, there was no mention of Cora… purposefully omitted?
2026-08-19 12:41:49
0
Caroline :
She explained how the drop in body temperature would have occurred, but was never asked how long it would take for that to happen. At least that’s how I heard it. I kept waiting for the question and it never came.
2026-08-19 01:52:30
386
Courtney McColl :
Today was unbelievable.. I couldn’t do a recap because it was so mind boggling my head hurts. Bow and co have got to go
2026-08-19 01:42:46
219
✨ lyric 💫 :
The defense is saying she did it, the prosecution is essentially presenting the case that the husband did it. The internet is feeling gaslit by everyone involved. 🤦♀️
2026-08-19 02:40:59
67
freedomactivation :
Hear me out - Reddington didn’t object BECAUSE it shows that Patrick's testimony is not consistent with the medical evidence being provided by the prosecution. He made this statement as a witness for the prosecution that he had to untie the bands. This essentially ruins his credibility as the main witness to this crime bc if he untied them the knot would have made a significant enough imprint to be documented. PLUS if consistent pressure had to be applied 5+ minutes for each child it messes with the timeline and allowing everything to be executed in the timeline provided by the commonwealth. Just my thoughts. But I’m just waiting to see if all of this actually comes out like this.
2026-08-19 03:14:22
70
EmmaRaye :
I also was very confused as to why Reddington didn’t object, being as the prosecutor very clearly contradicted (outright lied) their own witness’ testimony. Not to mention, she is actually the one that verified when questioning Patrick, that the bands were “tied like a shoelace”. Like what? As far as the Catholic comment, my blood was boiling. Completely unnecessary.
2026-08-19 02:00:24
132
Kathylovesyou :
What stands out in my mind was the fact that that Dr. Z really wanted to share her perspective after his initial meeting with LC. He was VERY keen to share what he’s learned post event. The defense wouldn’t let him share. WHAT did he want to say???? Remember he testified a LOUD MALE voice yelling at her.
2026-08-19 12:33:45
1
Valentine Girardot :
From Australia, thank you for your service
2026-08-19 01:47:03
179
Carlie Kearns :
i also lost the plot… i don’t know what anyone’s doing anymore!
2026-08-19 01:43:56
245
Kimberly Scott :
I will never get over how the timeline doesn’t make sense ESPECIALLY given the heart rate data we have now. But I don’t think there will ever be justice served. I truly believes that she thinks that she did it. Either that or she is just taking all the blame to help win the civil case to help pay her parents back financially. Those are my two theories and I will die on this hill ✌️
2026-08-19 02:01:58
79
lauren baker :
I wish Reddington would ask someone about how the marriage between Patrick and Lindsay was! It seems like such an important detail that we have no info on. The repetitive mention of her symptoms / medication seems redundant at this point. Praying he at least hits more on the inconsistencies in the timeline…and if not, I seriously hope this jury is paying a ton of attention to those little bits that would be easy to miss.
2026-08-19 02:34:43
41
brava0403 :
Idk I thought Reddington would’ve casted more doubt! I think Alan Jackson remains my favorite.
2026-08-19 12:17:29
1
Torr✨ :
I keep coming to your page every hour waiting. I’m sorry for the pressure 😭
2026-08-19 12:35:28
0
sam :
Do you think Reddington didn’t go off because maybe he will put PC on the stand?
2026-08-19 01:52:41
64
Iffa85 :
He said she remembered the incident. The memory was fuzzy. She remembers the voice. Not once did he say she said she did it, or that she remembers doing it. That was if you get dragged for saying that, they can drag me for it too. Because that wording was intentional IMO. Also.... The NERVE of Sprague to ask Dr. Laposatta if she forgot her medical knowledge from 20 years ago... While forgetting her witnesses testimony from TWO WEEKS prior? I cant even deal with these women anymore. I just cant. They're bullying witnesses at this point. Also, thank you for being a little vulnerable with your stay at McLean in 2019. I was at TaraVista in May of this year because my inflammatory arthritis medication was switched to generic and it caused mania and paranoia for over a week. Naturally, DCF was called on me, too. Its like we're not allowed to be humans in need of anything. The way the ER staff treated me at the hospital was atrocious, too.
2026-08-19 02:16:37
49
Cris :
Also, Ziesel (?) said she told him she “remembers what happened”. Not that she remembered doing any of it. Correct? Or am I splitting hairs here?
2026-08-19 02:44:23
32
Missy Bee 🐝 :
I’m really disgusted that they never did any labs. Hormones (including thyroid), hemoglobin, magnesium, nothing. All of which can affect mood and energy levels.
2026-08-19 02:50:03
16
LK :
What I actually LOVE about you, is that you add your personal experiences which to me adds to your credibility and makes me believe your head/heart is in the right place! Love your videos!! Thank you for walking through the trial for us ❤️
2026-08-19 01:52:51
111
Mariah Michelle | MHH :
I was confused why Reddington didn’t ask Dr. laposata more questions about the damaged voice box cartilages. The medical expert Vulfovich said due to her spinal injuries her diaphragm wouldn’t be working properly. To me, I thought we were indirectly told twice that talking would’ve been hard for separate reasons, why didn’t we explicitly ask???
2026-08-19 04:39:13
10
Jaded Jane :
My favorite part was I said well it’s obvious the prosecutor never used an exercise band 😂
2026-08-19 02:44:36
43
To see more videos from user @asked_answered, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
