they should have kept the sub-names underneath the card name this is always gonna be annoying to me
2026-08-19 15:38:50
525
Shawn :
NOW LETS DO IT FOR THE $100 JIN SAKAI
2026-08-19 19:44:45
1
colby :
different name, different card
2026-08-19 16:46:01
110
jimmigreene :
same card. saved you the time
2026-08-19 15:09:54
50
Zim :
why doesn't Grey have the text that let's people know its a reprint of rick
2026-08-19 18:24:31
17
Arthur :
name isn't Rick. I'm playing 4 of both.
2026-08-19 21:24:22
3
Rünne7 🏛️ :
Yes you can play both greymand and rick
2026-08-21 02:22:57
1
☆freaknareff☆🏳️⚧️ :
is there a scryfall tag for this?
2026-08-19 19:30:58
2
Joe Tice :
Wizards just shouldn’t do this imo.
2026-08-19 21:57:52
11
mikelanden8 :
then they should've made the name under it like the other alt named cards.
2026-08-19 15:41:46
22
Crusci :
Would it really break humans to have 2 of this guy?
2026-08-22 02:42:02
0
CT11 :
i assume they coulnt just print the name of the og card under the reprint, because they most likely dont have permision to use the name, as it wasnt a part of the original contract. the printing of the name without permision on a product for sale would cause legal issues if it wasnt agreed beforehand.
2026-08-19 15:46:53
5
Tristan Allen Pierce :
Different name, different card.
2026-08-20 23:50:52
2
SirDeyv :
I am so glad I'm out of magic at the moment. That's fucking stupid and confusing
2026-08-19 22:20:03
1
Storm3672 :
okay, but what if I have greymond on my field and use a copy spell on an opponents rick?
2026-08-19 22:44:37
0
𖤓lilkpottt :
greymond is actually more expensive but im adding rick to my SpongeBob deck
2026-08-19 16:15:40
2
Knautical :
Wish they did these universes within prints more
2026-08-19 19:32:39
2
Gamers unite :
just to save time, a card being mechanicly the same is not the same thing as being the same card. greymond and rick actualey are the same card technicaly speaking. greymond was created because people wanted a in universe version of rick to better fit there decks asthetic.
2026-08-19 19:57:41
1
toxicantsole139 :
see this is my main problem with UB. They should have done the subname thing they do for secret lairs for all ub cards with just some random generic card name that doesnt exist yet. gives them free reign to print them again without needing the obscure little symbol that is undoubtedly going to confuse a whole bunch of people.
2026-08-19 21:23:08
5
Brandon :
I’ve never noticed the =SLD143…
2026-08-19 15:18:14
1
teddy :
they should’ve just not done mechanically unique secret lairs (or any mechanically unique UB at all tbh) since they’d inevitably run into issues with reprints like this. just a giant middle finger to all the 60 card eternal format players (seriously, grixis affinity in pauper is gonna be $300 in a few years because those utrom monitors can never be reprinted)
2026-08-20 02:54:00
0
Dan :
A black marker would take care of the problem and then I can play them both in the same deck 😁
2026-08-21 13:46:42
0
Cerberus :
This is the first I am seeing of his card.. I need it so bad for my green white humans but why is he $71 Dollars!!
2026-08-20 18:59:33
0
tapforme_mtg :
So educational
2026-08-20 17:00:38
0
Haiabaksidbd :
the only card like this that I want is Themberchaud 😔
2026-08-19 20:22:30
0
To see more videos from user @mtgrecon, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.