@kara_marlene: 😳 THE COMMONWEALTH IS NOW GOING AFTER THE DEFENSE EXPERT HIMSELF — AND HIS RESPONSE MADE ME LAUGH. This is Dr. Paul Zeizel, the defense psychologist who has testified that, in his professional opinion, Lindsay Clancy was suffering from bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis and was not able to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or conform her behavior to the law. So naturally, his credibility matters A LOT. And during cross-examination, the Commonwealth started digging into HIM. “You’ve known Attorney Reddington for a number of years, correct?” “You’ve done quite a bit of work with him over the years?” Then she moved into his credentials. He has a doctorate in clinical psychology. He has extensive military experience. But: “You are not a prescriber of medications here in the Commonwealth, are you?” And his response: “I was asked about that…” 😂 Sir knew EXACTLY where we were going. Now, underneath the facial expressions and the back-and-forth, there is an important legal strategy happening here. The Commonwealth is trying to give this jury reasons to question how much weight they should give Dr. Zeizel’s opinions. If he has worked repeatedly with Reddington, does that suggest partiality? If he is a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist who prescribes medication, should the jury give less weight to opinions involving Lindsay’s medications? Those are legitimate areas for cross-examination. But they do NOT automatically invalidate his testimony. And Zeizel certainly did not appear interested in letting the prosecutor turn those questions into something bigger than they were. That little “I was asked about that…” told me he knew this ground had already been covered. This is where expert testimony gets really interesting. The defense puts forward an expert opinion. The Commonwealth doesn’t just attack the opinion. They attack the foundation underneath the person giving it. Then the jury decides what — and WHO — they believe. Watch this exchange and tell me if you read his response the same way I did. 😂 #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PaulZeizel #Courtroom #TrialCoverage
Kara Marlene | KaraVan Journey
Region: US
Wednesday 19 August 2026 14:53:01 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
Kelly🦋 :
They are becoming more and more unprofessional as this trial goes on.
2026-08-19 17:13:58
3407
aaaaaaaa :
IM ASKING THE QUESTIONS
2026-08-19 20:54:29
178
Ashley :
I wish the judge would address her unprofessional demeanor and lack of quality questions.
2026-08-19 17:29:30
1405
Dora 🤠 :
She 100% sees all the talk about her on the internet and is starting to break.
2026-08-19 18:51:29
382
Rin :
"I am not, and I was not yesterday either when I was asked about that" you dropped something sir 🎤
2026-08-19 19:35:48
119
JustJen :
I feel like these ladies are always thinking “GOTCHA” when they come up with these questions. High-fiving each other when they write them out before hand.
2026-08-19 17:18:30
346
Anita J. Shipman :
She is very rude
2026-08-19 16:13:28
839
Jojo :
Regardless of how you view this case, the prosecutions behavior and ethic alone, are enough for a mistrial or something cuz wtf are they doing 👀
2026-08-19 21:02:39
101
izzy_19903 :
Psychologists do not prescribe lol
2026-08-19 16:31:58
538
Lovely :
Yess or no
2026-08-19 15:52:05
3041
Manda :
I liked when he told her that she makes it impossible to answer the question
2026-08-19 15:51:58
1122
Southtxfoodie :
He’s a medical expert and she would have hired him if she had the expertise to find him
2026-08-19 16:41:24
1030
tnicanb :
Yassss King
2026-08-19 21:44:57
0
SDZ ❌ :
Working with an attorney more than once is a GREEN flag. It speaks to experience and expertise and the ability to give competent testimony. I know what Bow & Co are trying here but it’s so counterproductive.
2026-08-19 17:21:37
158
EC :
How can you say to a witness “yes or no” when you aren’t asking a yes or no question? Trying to limit their testimony makes it look like the prosecution is scared of what he’s going to say (and that’s probably true!)
2026-08-19 19:33:04
78
ionelap😘 :
All she does is question his credibility...she didnt cross exam about the incident at all. she keept asking about after the incident...becos she doesn't have nothing to ask...
2026-08-19 15:50:02
251
CJB :
“And I wasn’t yesterday when I was asked about that either” they are all sooo DONE with the prosecution 😂
2026-08-19 20:06:52
153
Mrssequins78 :
She really tried that with a PSYCHOLOGIST 😳
2026-08-19 20:45:26
6
Lauren :
She's just so rude, it comes off so bad. there is a way to get your points across that isn't this
2026-08-19 17:26:29
36
user5941202116602 :
Uhm, uhm, uhm, uhm, uhm
2026-08-19 16:20:34
114
emme :
Red asked it yesterday knowing she would try to make it a “aha” moment. Beat her to the chase.
2026-08-19 20:52:39
5
Us7_. :
All they do is attack credibility
2026-08-19 18:39:13
17
Tapatía :
yes or no?
2026-08-19 20:44:09
29
To see more videos from user @kara_marlene, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.