@abcnews: Newly released footage shows the moment a porch collapsed as U.S. Marshals were serving a warrant last month in Missouri. Seven officers were injured, officials said.

ABC News

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Wednesday 19 August 2026 19:51:36 GMT

51089

807

103

103

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (5.98MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (5.33MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Holding Pattern :

Yo ABC News, what’s “scarier” is how these people violate civil rights. What a joke N

2026-08-20 01:37:10

0

￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :

Who they were trying to arrest

2026-08-19 19:59:13

56

Adrian Medrano :

is the motorcycle ok 😳

2026-08-20 01:24:34

0

Chrissy Krempa :

Boobytrapped

2026-08-20 02:00:10

0

Christines.crochet :

Why did they need that many officers?

2026-08-20 01:08:03

6

Junior Alonzo :

got dammit Bobby

2026-08-20 01:15:14

0

Kenny Brewer :

What goes up must come down

2026-08-20 01:06:38

1

Ruben Gallegos :

2026-08-19 23:04:47

1

user2645615567504 :

Only havy duty officers

2026-08-19 23:24:07

7

Adriana Burke :

God is Great thank you Lord 🙏

2026-08-19 21:40:16

14

Trinique65 :

Not scary at all

2026-08-20 00:09:01

3

☆Elizabeth☆ :

Not true this is ice 😀😀

2026-08-19 23:18:54

4

Suzanne Lalchan :

sure them home owners

2026-08-19 19:59:26

7

Ray Terrazas931 :

That wasnt the whitehouse wrong house LMFAO

2026-08-19 22:17:00

5

Kaycee Franck :

Karma

2026-08-19 20:41:02

4

Cuddly Panda :

There are lessons to be learned here. Don’t know what they are..

2026-08-19 19:57:54

18

Gina M. :

Cops

2026-08-19 23:13:02

2

Angelica Urias :

God said not today

2026-08-19 23:44:52

2

jac0b2746 :

Earlyyy

2026-08-19 19:54:55

4

Kentucky_Heathen :

2026-08-19 22:40:45

1

🪷🌺Madison💮 Jane🪷🪷 :

really wow 😳😳😳

2026-08-19 19:53:22

0

missg :

wowzers 😁i hope they are all ok Amen 🙏

2026-08-19 23:53:28

1

To see more videos from user @abcnews, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham’s number is not simply “a very large number.” It belongs to a completely different scale of mathematical magnitude. The number is so huge that even describing the number of digits in it requires another enormous number. In fact, if someone attempted to physically write out Graham’s number using ordinary decimal notation, the observable universe would not contain enough space to store all of its digits. Despite its gigantic size, Graham’s number is a perfectly well-defined finite integer. It is not infinity. It does not contain an endless number of digits. It has a specific, finite value determined by a precise mathematical definition. Where Does Graham’s Number Come From? Graham’s number originated in a problem from Ramsey theory, an area of mathematics concerned with finding order and structure within sufficiently large systems. The number is associated with mathematician Ronald Graham, who worked on a problem involving the coloring of the edges of a high-dimensional hypercube. The problem asks, roughly speaking, how large a dimension is required before a particular type of monochromatic structure is guaranteed to appear. The original mathematical problem does not require Graham’s number itself to be exactly the smallest possible answer. Instead, Graham’s number was used as an extremely large upper bound. This is important because Graham’s number was not invented merely to create the largest number imaginable. It appeared naturally as part of a serious mathematical argument. How Big Is Graham’s Number? To understand Graham’s number, it is useful to begin with ordinary large numbers. A million is: 1,000,000 A billion is: 1,000,000,000 A googol is: 10¹⁰⁰ A googol already has 101 digits. That sounds enormous compared with everyday quantities, but compared with Graham’s number, a googol is essentially microscopic. A googolplex is: 10^(10¹⁰⁰) A googolplex is vastly larger than a googol. Even so, Graham’s number completely overwhelms a googolplex. The reason is that Graham’s number is constructed using a special notation called Knuth’s up-arrow notation. Knuth’s Up-Arrow Notation Mathematician Donald Knuth introduced up-arrow notation as a convenient way to describe extremely rapidly growing operations. For example: a ↑ b means exponentiation: aᵇ So: 3 ↑ 4 = 3⁴ = 81 But adding another arrow changes the operation dramatically. a ↑↑ b represents a power tower. For example: 3 ↑↑ 4 means: 3^(3^(3^3)) This is already enormously larger than ordinary exponentiation. The expression can be visualized as a tower: 3 ↑ 3 ↑ 3 ↑ 3 The height of the tower is determined by the second number. Then things become even more extreme. a ↑↑↑ b uses three arrows and represents repeated tetration-like operations. It is vastly faster-growing than double-arrow notation. With four arrows: a ↑↑↑↑ b the growth becomes even more extraordinary. The number of arrows itself becomes part of the magnitude. The Beginning of Graham’s Number Graham’s number is usually defined through a sequence of numbers. Let: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 Already, this first number is unimaginably large. But this is only the beginning. The next number is defined as: g₂ = 3 ↑^(g₁) 3 Here, the notation ↑^(g₁) means that there are g₁ up-arrows between the two 3s. This is difficult to comprehend. Remember that g₁ is already enormously large. Now imagine taking that gigantic number and using it as the number of arrows in the next operation #creatorsearchinsights #antitcc #rampage #dance#viralvideos

Graham’s number is not simply “a very large number.” It belongs to a completely different scale of mathematical magnitude. The number is so huge that even describing the number of digits in it requires another enormous number. In fact, if someone attempted to physically write out Graham’s number using ordinary decimal notation, the observable universe would not contain enough space to store all of its digits. Despite its gigantic size, Graham’s number is a perfectly well-defined finite integer. It is not infinity. It does not contain an endless number of digits. It has a specific, finite value determined by a precise mathematical definition. Where Does Graham’s Number Come From? Graham’s number originated in a problem from Ramsey theory, an area of mathematics concerned with finding order and structure within sufficiently large systems. The number is associated with mathematician Ronald Graham, who worked on a problem involving the coloring of the edges of a high-dimensional hypercube. The problem asks, roughly speaking, how large a dimension is required before a particular type of monochromatic structure is guaranteed to appear. The original mathematical problem does not require Graham’s number itself to be exactly the smallest possible answer. Instead, Graham’s number was used as an extremely large upper bound. This is important because Graham’s number was not invented merely to create the largest number imaginable. It appeared naturally as part of a serious mathematical argument. How Big Is Graham’s Number? To understand Graham’s number, it is useful to begin with ordinary large numbers. A million is: 1,000,000 A billion is: 1,000,000,000 A googol is: 10¹⁰⁰ A googol already has 101 digits. That sounds enormous compared with everyday quantities, but compared with Graham’s number, a googol is essentially microscopic. A googolplex is: 10^(10¹⁰⁰) A googolplex is vastly larger than a googol. Even so, Graham’s number completely overwhelms a googolplex. The reason is that Graham’s number is constructed using a special notation called Knuth’s up-arrow notation. Knuth’s Up-Arrow Notation Mathematician Donald Knuth introduced up-arrow notation as a convenient way to describe extremely rapidly growing operations. For example: a ↑ b means exponentiation: aᵇ So: 3 ↑ 4 = 3⁴ = 81 But adding another arrow changes the operation dramatically. a ↑↑ b represents a power tower. For example: 3 ↑↑ 4 means: 3^(3^(3^3)) This is already enormously larger than ordinary exponentiation. The expression can be visualized as a tower: 3 ↑ 3 ↑ 3 ↑ 3 The height of the tower is determined by the second number. Then things become even more extreme. a ↑↑↑ b uses three arrows and represents repeated tetration-like operations. It is vastly faster-growing than double-arrow notation. With four arrows: a ↑↑↑↑ b the growth becomes even more extraordinary. The number of arrows itself becomes part of the magnitude. The Beginning of Graham’s Number Graham’s number is usually defined through a sequence of numbers. Let: g₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 Already, this first number is unimaginably large. But this is only the beginning. The next number is defined as: g₂ = 3 ↑^(g₁) 3 Here, the notation ↑^(g₁) means that there are g₁ up-arrows between the two 3s. This is difficult to comprehend. Remember that g₁ is already enormously large. Now imagine taking that gigantic number and using it as the number of arrows in the next operation #creatorsearchinsights #antitcc #rampage #dance#viralvideos

ciao

#humor

🎊 RESERVADA!🥳 🍓Titan 150 2008 único dono com apenas 29 mil km, dois pneus zero e placa Mercosul zerada, moto toda original💎 🧐 vistoria cautelar aprovada! 💰Valor 14.500 reais#titan2008 #titan #viral_video #viral #viraliza

🎊 RESERVADA!🥳 🍓Titan 150 2008 único dono com apenas 29 mil km, dois pneus zero e placa Mercosul zerada, moto toda original💎 🧐 vistoria cautelar aprovada! 💰Valor 14.500 reais#titan2008 #titan #viral_video #viral #viraliza

@João Appolinário | Líder x Chefe #reflexão #liderança #appolinarioclipfy #clipfyleague #joaoappolinario

@João Appolinário | Líder x Chefe #reflexão #liderança #appolinarioclipfy #clipfyleague #joaoappolinario

#ragnar #fyp #foryou #edit #explore

#ragnar #fyp #foryou #edit #explore

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy