@jesken12: #charliekirk

Cortney Sherwood :

So well said ☺️☺️

celestekauer938 :

its just like cars tho, people die in accidents WAYYYYYY more than from guns. but its still worth the risk to have cars.

maureenserenity :

CHARLIE KIRK advocated for what happened to him, NOT US.

thatguuuurllll :

I’ll say it. He deserved EXACTLY what he got 😁

sj215 :

Are you that brain dead? To take that quote and think he agrees with murder? I’m sure he would never advocate unjust gun violence you dolt. He advocated for the right to defend oneself. Incredible you can’t differentiate the ideas.

Logan :

it was poetic if anything

Taylor G :

that's what people don't understand: not having sympathy for Charlie isn't mocking him or saying he deserved it. it just means he was a terrible person and wouldn't have cared if it was one of his fans.

Jaymie :

I think political violence such as this is necessary 🤷🏻

Crosby 8787 :

Couldn’t imagine being sad over a death of someone you don’t know personally

Daniel :

He lived his truth 👍

sammae :

he did tho imo

\pi :

Charlie Kirk advocated for public executions of his political enemies.

Christian Mathew :

He put it very poorly. His point was that the rise of school shootings were a necessary cost for the 2nd amendment. It's not shown in that clip, but he also spoke many times on WHY the 2nd amendment was so important; it makes it impossible for any form of government to control the citizenry by force. And if you know a thing or two about history, or even certain modern-day countries (Iran, North Korea) you would be aware of the horrible atrocities they inflict on their own people, including children (North Korea is known to have m*rdered infants in front of their mothers for failing to swear allegiance to the state). The point of the 2nd amendment is to make that impossible, or at least attempt to. When you look at it through that lens, you can start to see why even the horrific tragedies that happen today might pale in comparison to what COULD be, if we didn't have that protected right. TL;DR: He believed safely and security is an individual right and responsibility, and believed any government entrusted with that responsibility would result in worse tragedies than what we see today. Hard as that is to imagine.

SlooperCooper :

He just didn’t think he was going to be one of the deaths. He was ok with it being someone else though

🇵🇷 Jimmy Cruz 💙 ❌ 💙 :

What happened to Charlie Kirk is rational.

Davickster1 :

Oh I kinda think he did. It’s called karma.

Tiffany :

I don’t know what Charlie things guns protect, except themselves? But even then you can’t protect yourself if you don’t know it’s coming🤷🏻‍♀️guns protect nothing that a knife can’t.

bfe261 :

I won’t say “deserved”. But I ain’t exactly weeping. I do not think it’s a great loss. And I LOVE that he became a meme.

an :

Dennis Shurtleff :

He advocated for what happened to him so I'm ok with that single instance of what happened to him

itsabughunt :

all redumblicans

Jazmine Kristina :

Love you ❤️

Michael | Healed Life :

I think my reaction, which seems commensurate with his dignity, was basically "Huh. Anyway..."

Freshman15Davey :

WORD FOR WORD. I’ve been trying to articulate this exact point but couldn’t. Thank you kindly stranger!