Emily Giffin
Region: US
Saturday 22 August 2026 20:17:12 GMT
512039
37305
2068
6996
Music
Download
Comments
NicTok :
I think Reddington believes Patrick did it but that’s not the best defense course of action for Lindsay
2026-08-22 22:04:48
4499
Mary Yerger :
Did the state prove she did it? I think the state DID NOT prove anything.
2026-08-22 22:47:40
8692
Nurse Holly :
So when she is found not guilty…they can come back and try patrick??
2026-08-22 22:45:08
6434
Jennifer Johnson :
Lindsay Clancy is innocent. She was framed by her psychotic ex husband.
2026-08-22 22:35:23
648
fmhsa8 :
I don’t know if she did it or not. I have reasonable doubt.
2026-08-23 02:27:37
1430
Lori :
Her body temperature being 82 is a deal breaker.
2026-08-22 23:14:46
568
SS :
"two things can be true at once...She could have been under psychosis and she could have not been the one to unalive her children" 👍🫡 well done mam!!!!! that was the best line ive heard this whole trial
2026-08-23 04:13:21
259
Mel :
In Opening Reddington explicitly used the words ‘she wasn’t trying to wipe out her family so she could start a brand new improved life’ they didn’t mean anything at the time but now seem oh so deliberate. I can’t imagine he will overtly push a third party defense but his closing statement is going to make history. And make Patrick shudder and quake.
2026-08-23 03:24:52
1554
Georgr :
Her only defense is not guilty by reason of insanity.
2026-08-28 13:36:33
0
KrystalB 🦩 :
Her arrest and this case was built upon Patrick saying that she did it. The prosecution failed to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. Everyone following the case can see a chain of events that failed the children and Lindsay. Whether she did the act while drugged and in psychosis or whether someone else did this, Lindsay died twice (coded) due to her injuries and those precious babies lost their lives. The investigation, the lies, the crime scene not being secured, phone records sealed, cameras unplugged or removed, WiFi “not working”, the lack of dna evidence, the children being cremated, Patrick’s behavior which is beyond bizarre & suspicious all add up to confusion. But they arrested Lindsay because Patrick said she confessed that night.
2026-08-23 00:10:17
396
Philothurium :
I'm sorry but.. if anything.. they proved he likely did it
2026-08-22 23:29:10
953
ThunderB4Lightnin :
There is a real lack of physical evidence pointing to Lindsay… prints, DNA, timeline ect.
2026-08-22 20:26:31
3575
colleenthebean :
Is there a way they can go after him and try him for this? After this trial ?
2026-08-22 21:33:11
920
nowars25 :
I think they thought she would die and there would be no trial.
2026-08-22 21:39:28
618
EMazza :
The state didn’t prove a thing.
2026-08-22 23:16:32
213
Tammy :
Question you know Red’s 3 investigators found what TikTok investigators found if not more why has he not presented ANY of it in court?
2026-08-27 11:14:03
1
anbreezz :
I truly think that Reddington is trying to save her life in the sense that he would rather have her in a mental institution then a prison cell so I really think he’s agreeing to stipulations to save her life and save the quality of life, but I do not think that she did this
2026-08-22 23:55:57
312
4heartz26 :
She is not going home if she gets not guilty. She’ll go into the state psychiatric system. That’s crazy talk.🤯
2026-08-23 02:23:50
15
Kristin :
Isn’t it possible that she could have absolutely been in some sort of psychosis or seroquel fog, and still not committed the crime?
2026-08-23 02:51:22
133
alonebut_ :
One of the medics confirmed a child was hanging and Reddington asked PC if he hung all the pictures in the house. You are spot on with your analysis
2026-08-23 12:00:46
135
e :
I can believe she COULD have done it under psychosis .....but I don't think she was physical capable to do it with the circumstances presented 🤷♀️
2026-08-23 18:03:07
104
Courtney :
I really liked Resnick’s testimony but I didn’t like how he kept saying, “when she killed her kids..” and I hope that isn’t an influence.
2026-08-23 02:48:35
38
Emily Giffin :
Regarding the stipulation: There was a stipulation, but it was much narrower than an admission that Lindsay Clancy committed the murders. On August 4, Lindsay personally agreed in court to stipulate to certain forensic/evidentiary facts. The judge questioned her outside the jury’s presence to make sure she understood that, by stipulating, she was agreeing that the Commonwealth did not have to call witnesses to prove those particular facts and that she was giving up her right to confront those witnesses. The stipulations primarily concerned chain of custody and forensic testing—including DNA/blood/bodily-fluid evidence, exercise bands, and toxicology testing involving the three children. Reddington explained why the defense did it: it eliminated the need for the prosecution to bring in dozens of witnesses simply to establish chain of custody and other uncontested forensic foundation. But—the stipulation was NOT a guilty plea and was NOT a stipulation that Lindsay murdered the children. Her plea remained NOT GUILTY. Reddington did say something potentially confusing in explaining the stipulation: “We have not been contesting the government’s case in chief, if you will.” But that's an attorney explaining what evidence the defense was choosing not to contest; it isn't Lindsay changing her plea or legally admitting guilt.
2026-08-22 23:56:34
511
𝐵𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓍🗽𝐹𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓉👑🌍💚 :
This is the BEST break down I’ve seen yet. I’m sick of people saying “but she confessed,” “but her lawyer said she didn’t it,” “this is only to determine if she was insane or not,” blah blah blah blah. The state STILL has to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, and my gosh there’s so much doubt it’s not even funny.
2026-08-22 22:59:53
166
SLH1313 :
Here is the biggest question.. if she is found not guilty by reason of insanity, can Patrick be investigated and potentially indicted?
2026-08-23 01:11:19
66
To see more videos from user @emilygiffinauthor, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
