@dungtran.bds: Mua đất quan trọng vị trí , không phải mua ở đâu cũng lời #datbaubang #nhabaubang #kcnbaubang #datnenvungven #datnengiare

Dũng Review BĐS
Dũng Review BĐS
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Sunday 23 August 2026 01:17:25 GMT
82782
948
246
147

Music

Download

Comments

.phng1519
Đỗ Phương :
tôi mua 1 tỉ giờ bán 600 trăm mà nó còn bảo có gì em điện lại
2026-08-23 06:17:07
49
tintrungle2
Trung Lê :
Tôi mua 1ti giờ kêu bán 400 k ai mua🥺🥺
2026-08-23 10:42:23
14
ongchutuoingo12
Ông Chú Tuổi Ngọ :
Khu bau Bang ..Ngay Trung Tâm hành chánh ,ngay trong khu công nghiệp sát bên cty đi bộ qua làm luôn ,,Còn vắng người Vì đất Rộng qua …Muốn chi mấy KDC nay …
2026-08-23 07:10:26
7
101186thanh
Nguyễn Thành 🇻🇳🇰🇷 :
Quy hoạch nhìn vuông vắn đẹp vậy mà sao giờ lại không có ai mua nhỉ. nhìn cảnh quan đẹp mà a
2026-08-23 10:11:32
5
tholes576
THẢO❤️les :
tui mua 8 lô đời đầu 800/ lô . sau đó bán được 2 lô lúc đó lời 200. giờ còn 6 lô ở đây.
2026-08-23 07:30:50
11
huytran5503
. :
Quan trọng nó có sổ k r xin giấy phép xd đc k
2026-08-23 14:35:03
1
maiphong_17
𝓜𝓪𝓲 𝓟𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓰 𝟏𝟕 :
Đường bé bằng mắt muỗi
2026-08-23 13:44:20
0
hangduong082
Hằng Dương :
Ở đâu BP vậy mn
2026-08-23 14:55:50
0
trancamlong
Tran Cam Long :
Trước giờ tôi không bao giờ tin cty bds phân lô kiểu này,kể cả vin
2026-08-23 14:23:22
0
hoangthach2901
Lê Hoàng Thạch :
Cắt lỗ trên lãi àh
2026-08-23 17:16:59
0
quanabc705
Quân Vũ :
Giảm 80% may ra bán dc
2026-08-23 22:53:04
0
vietnamphuc
Phạm Phúc :
Vậy chứ hỏi tới giá trên trời
2026-08-23 12:04:25
0
rooster_vi.thuy_95
Gà Trống Miền Tây✅🐓 :
đường lộ sẵn trơn đẹp vậy mà bán rẻ vậy
2026-08-23 11:28:00
0
haquangdat10031999
ĐẠT ĐĂNG TRAVEL🏖️ :
Đẩy giá ảo , toàn mua bán qua tay
2026-08-23 11:21:18
0
vansac1994
Bùi Văn Sắc :
Đất k sổ hay sao mà khả năng thanh khoản kém vậy bác ?
2026-08-24 02:26:17
0
monsterhumm
Juuwei :
Sale off 50% nữa là có ng mua
2026-08-23 18:54:41
1
userrmiplz8xwm
dương quá :
nhìn xung quanh chả có một ngôi nhà ...toàn đầu cơ kiểu đó....nên mún mua củng sợ ma tối chả dám đi...rắn rết côn trùng nó cắn sml nữa😂
2026-08-23 22:13:31
0
doilathe1900
Đời Là Thế :
đất phân lô chủ yếu bỏ hoang rất nhiều, vậy mà cơ quan quản lý làm.ngơ
2026-08-23 14:46:12
0
lesynguyet1503
lesynguyet1503 :
Sắp mang dây rồi
2026-08-23 13:49:21
0
dobeyeu.mebau
Tiemmevyvy :
chỗ nào vậy abh
2026-08-23 13:58:52
0
leminh010784
Điện máy Lê minh bình Phước :
Vâng dân số thì giảm
2026-08-23 09:52:53
0
hienlebds
Lê Văn Hiển :
quả này phải mời bia Dũng ơi. 3 video đều lên cả.
2026-08-23 09:52:28
3
user85406509
Nguyen Vantinh :
bao giờ mới có người ở. bao giờ mới lấp đầy. có bán rẻ thì họ ở 1 mình cũng sợ.
2026-08-23 12:12:35
0
lachabon3
Ngu mới chưởi tao :
Ở đâu v
2026-08-23 13:56:11
0
phan.nht050
Nhất Nhà Nông :
sao ko trồng sầu riêng lấy ngắn nuôi dài
2026-08-23 09:03:18
0
To see more videos from user @dungtran.bds, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

⚡ Claude Code vs Codex: they can both help you build software with AI, but treating them like the same tool means you’re probably missing what each one is actually best at. 👨‍💻🤖 Claude Code is built for the moments when you want to stay close to the work. It can understand your codebase, read and edit files, run commands, execute tests, investigate bugs and help you iterate while you remain directly involved in the development process. 🧠💻 Think of it as an AI coding partner sitting beside you while you work through the repository. You can explore an unfamiliar project, trace an error across multiple files, make targeted changes, run tests, inspect the result and keep refining until the implementation behaves the way you expect. 🔍✅ That makes Claude Code especially useful for deep codebase work where context matters. Complex debugging, precise edits, architecture changes, refactoring, troubleshooting and iterative development are all situations where having the AI actively working inside the same project context can be incredibly powerful. 🔧📂 You are still driving the workflow, but the AI dramatically reduces the amount of manual searching, repetitive editing and command execution you would normally have to perform. Codex takes a different approach. 🚀 Instead of thinking only about an AI assistant working beside you, think about delegating engineering work to AI agents. You define the outcome, hand over tasks and allow agents to work across cloud environments, execute coding tasks and return results for you to review. ☁️🤖 This becomes especially interesting when the work can be split into multiple streams. One agent could work on an API, another could update tests, another could handle documentation and another could tackle a separate refactor. 🔀⚙️ Multi-agent workflows make it possible to parallelise engineering tasks that would normally happen one after another. Codex is therefore particularly useful when you want to offload larger pieces of work, run tasks in parallel, handle background engineering workflows or scale how much development work can happen at once. 📈 Instead of constantly guiding every small step, you can focus more on defining the goal, reviewing results and deciding what should be merged, refined or changed. The easiest way to think about the difference is this: Claude Code is excellent when you want hands-on control, deep repository context and continuous iteration. 🧩 Codex becomes powerful when you want delegation, parallel execution and higher-level orchestration. 🎯 And you do not necessarily need to choose one forever. The strongest workflow may actually use both. You could use Claude Code for the difficult debugging session where you need to understand every detail, then use Codex to delegate independent tasks once the direction is clear. 🔄💡 AI-assisted software development is quickly moving beyond simply asking a chatbot to “write some code.” We are moving toward systems that can understand repositories, execute commands, test their own work, coordinate multiple agents and complete meaningful engineering tasks. 🚀 The advantage will not come from using the most AI tools. It will come from understanding which tool fits which workflow. 🧠 Save this guide so you can come back to it when choosing your AI coding stack. 📌 Share it with someone experimenting with AI-assisted development, and follow TechSerks for more practical breakdowns of AI tools, automation, coding workflows and the technology shaping the future of work. 🤖⚡ #TechSerks #ClaudeCode #Codex #AICoding #artificialintelligence
⚡ Claude Code vs Codex: they can both help you build software with AI, but treating them like the same tool means you’re probably missing what each one is actually best at. 👨‍💻🤖 Claude Code is built for the moments when you want to stay close to the work. It can understand your codebase, read and edit files, run commands, execute tests, investigate bugs and help you iterate while you remain directly involved in the development process. 🧠💻 Think of it as an AI coding partner sitting beside you while you work through the repository. You can explore an unfamiliar project, trace an error across multiple files, make targeted changes, run tests, inspect the result and keep refining until the implementation behaves the way you expect. 🔍✅ That makes Claude Code especially useful for deep codebase work where context matters. Complex debugging, precise edits, architecture changes, refactoring, troubleshooting and iterative development are all situations where having the AI actively working inside the same project context can be incredibly powerful. 🔧📂 You are still driving the workflow, but the AI dramatically reduces the amount of manual searching, repetitive editing and command execution you would normally have to perform. Codex takes a different approach. 🚀 Instead of thinking only about an AI assistant working beside you, think about delegating engineering work to AI agents. You define the outcome, hand over tasks and allow agents to work across cloud environments, execute coding tasks and return results for you to review. ☁️🤖 This becomes especially interesting when the work can be split into multiple streams. One agent could work on an API, another could update tests, another could handle documentation and another could tackle a separate refactor. 🔀⚙️ Multi-agent workflows make it possible to parallelise engineering tasks that would normally happen one after another. Codex is therefore particularly useful when you want to offload larger pieces of work, run tasks in parallel, handle background engineering workflows or scale how much development work can happen at once. 📈 Instead of constantly guiding every small step, you can focus more on defining the goal, reviewing results and deciding what should be merged, refined or changed. The easiest way to think about the difference is this: Claude Code is excellent when you want hands-on control, deep repository context and continuous iteration. 🧩 Codex becomes powerful when you want delegation, parallel execution and higher-level orchestration. 🎯 And you do not necessarily need to choose one forever. The strongest workflow may actually use both. You could use Claude Code for the difficult debugging session where you need to understand every detail, then use Codex to delegate independent tasks once the direction is clear. 🔄💡 AI-assisted software development is quickly moving beyond simply asking a chatbot to “write some code.” We are moving toward systems that can understand repositories, execute commands, test their own work, coordinate multiple agents and complete meaningful engineering tasks. 🚀 The advantage will not come from using the most AI tools. It will come from understanding which tool fits which workflow. 🧠 Save this guide so you can come back to it when choosing your AI coding stack. 📌 Share it with someone experimenting with AI-assisted development, and follow TechSerks for more practical breakdowns of AI tools, automation, coding workflows and the technology shaping the future of work. 🤖⚡ #TechSerks #ClaudeCode #Codex #AICoding #artificialintelligence

About