1. Home
  2. Detail

@halinhpham95: Đèn lồng lân trung thu cho bé yêu. #denlantrungthu #denlongtrungthu #xuhuong

Phạm Hà Linh
Phạm Hà Linh
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Monday 24 August 2026 15:42:27 GMT
1025
4
0
12

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (4.7MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (4.7MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @halinhpham95, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos
Va chạm xe đầu kéo, 02 thanh niên thương vong #dthquangngai #dthquangngaimcv #baoquangngai #baoquangngaidientu #baovaphatthanhtruyenhinhquangngai #quangngai #kontum #tintuc #tintuc24h #tintucgiaitri #onhaxemtin #tintucnews #tiktoknews #congan #anninhtrattu #giaitri #tiktokgiaitri #tngt #atgt #phapluat
Va chạm xe đầu kéo, 02 thanh niên thương vong #dthquangngai #dthquangngaimcv #baoquangngai #baoquangngaidientu #baovaphatthanhtruyenhinhquangngai #quangngai #kontum #tintuc #tintuc24h #tintucgiaitri #onhaxemtin #tintucnews #tiktoknews #congan #anninhtrattu #giaitri #tiktokgiaitri #tngt #atgt #phapluat
#onthisday
#onthisday
Đủ ăn, đủ mặc, đủ Cha, đủ Mẹ, đủ bình an…❤️
Đủ ăn, đủ mặc, đủ Cha, đủ Mẹ, đủ bình an…❤️
part 338 | arendt wrote this in the voice of a judge, constructing the speech she thought the court should have given to eichmann before sentencing him to death. the line is the hinge of her entire argument in the book. eichmann’s defence, essentially, was that he was following orders. that he personally harboured no hatred for the jews. that he was a bureaucrat, a logistics man, a cog. that the moral responsibility lay elsewhere, with those who gave the commands. this defence has been used in some form at nearly every trial of its kind since. arendt’s answer is this line. in a nursery, she says, you can distinguish between what a child does and what they actually want or believe. the child who obeys under duress is not the same as the child who endorses. adults in political life do not have this defence available to them. the political world is constituted by action, not intention. what you do is what you support. compliance is participation. there is no neutral ground of merely-following-orders that places you outside the moral architecture of what is being done. this is one of the most contested and uncomfortable claims in modern political philosophy. it places the weight of political evil not on the exceptional monster but on the ordinary participant. it says that the system functions because ordinary people operate it, and operating it is endorsing it, regardless of what they tell themselves at the end of the day. arendt did not write this as an abstraction. she sat in the courtroom in jerusalem and watched eichmann. she found him not monstrous but mundane. a man of clichés, of paperwork, of procedures. a man who had simply stopped thinking. and that, she argued, was exactly the problem. the question is not whether you ordered it. the question is whether you did it. hannah arendt was born in hanover in 1906 and studied philosophy under martin heidegger and karl jaspers. she fled germany in 1933 after being arrested by the gestapo, eventually reaching the united states in 1941 after years as a stateless person in france. eichmann in jerusalem was published in 1963, based on her coverage of the trial for the new yorker. it introduced the phrase “the banality of evil” and generated one of the most fierce and sustained controversies in postwar intellectual life, with critics accusing her of blaming jewish victims and exonerating eichmann. she spent years defending the book. arendt died in new york in 1975 while working on the final section of the life of the mind, mid-sentence, at her typewriter. #hannaharendt #philosophy #darkacademiaaesthetic #existentialism #dailyquotes​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
part 338 | arendt wrote this in the voice of a judge, constructing the speech she thought the court should have given to eichmann before sentencing him to death. the line is the hinge of her entire argument in the book. eichmann’s defence, essentially, was that he was following orders. that he personally harboured no hatred for the jews. that he was a bureaucrat, a logistics man, a cog. that the moral responsibility lay elsewhere, with those who gave the commands. this defence has been used in some form at nearly every trial of its kind since. arendt’s answer is this line. in a nursery, she says, you can distinguish between what a child does and what they actually want or believe. the child who obeys under duress is not the same as the child who endorses. adults in political life do not have this defence available to them. the political world is constituted by action, not intention. what you do is what you support. compliance is participation. there is no neutral ground of merely-following-orders that places you outside the moral architecture of what is being done. this is one of the most contested and uncomfortable claims in modern political philosophy. it places the weight of political evil not on the exceptional monster but on the ordinary participant. it says that the system functions because ordinary people operate it, and operating it is endorsing it, regardless of what they tell themselves at the end of the day. arendt did not write this as an abstraction. she sat in the courtroom in jerusalem and watched eichmann. she found him not monstrous but mundane. a man of clichés, of paperwork, of procedures. a man who had simply stopped thinking. and that, she argued, was exactly the problem. the question is not whether you ordered it. the question is whether you did it. hannah arendt was born in hanover in 1906 and studied philosophy under martin heidegger and karl jaspers. she fled germany in 1933 after being arrested by the gestapo, eventually reaching the united states in 1941 after years as a stateless person in france. eichmann in jerusalem was published in 1963, based on her coverage of the trial for the new yorker. it introduced the phrase “the banality of evil” and generated one of the most fierce and sustained controversies in postwar intellectual life, with critics accusing her of blaming jewish victims and exonerating eichmann. she spent years defending the book. arendt died in new york in 1975 while working on the final section of the life of the mind, mid-sentence, at her typewriter. #hannaharendt #philosophy #darkacademiaaesthetic #existentialism #dailyquotes​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
MITOS ATAU FAKTA? TEROR ILMU HITAM YANG DITAKUTI DI JAWA KINI MENGINTAI LEWAT PAKET ONLINE... Dulu santet dikenal sebagai teror yang dikirim secara misterius. Namun bagaimana jika di zaman sekarang, teror itu datang dalam bentuk sebuah paket tanpa nama pengirim? Satu paket misterius membuka jalan menuju kutukan yang mengancam siapa pun yang menerimanya... Film Paket Santet | Tayang di bioskop mulai 27 Agustus 2026 @BASE Entertainment #paketsantet #filmpaketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #clippaketsantet #cpfPS1
MITOS ATAU FAKTA? TEROR ILMU HITAM YANG DITAKUTI DI JAWA KINI MENGINTAI LEWAT PAKET ONLINE... Dulu santet dikenal sebagai teror yang dikirim secara misterius. Namun bagaimana jika di zaman sekarang, teror itu datang dalam bentuk sebuah paket tanpa nama pengirim? Satu paket misterius membuka jalan menuju kutukan yang mengancam siapa pun yang menerimanya... Film Paket Santet | Tayang di bioskop mulai 27 Agustus 2026 @BASE Entertainment #paketsantet #filmpaketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #clippaketsantet #cpfPS1

About

Legal