@hninmaung374: အချပ်လက်ရာ အယ်ထပ်❤

Hnin Maung Maung
Hnin Maung Maung
Open In TikTok:
Region: MM
Tuesday 25 August 2026 13:02:38 GMT
1129
159
2
2

Music

Download

Comments

cocheri0
MK9 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-25 13:13:59
0
thiha.aung.official8
Thiha Aung (official)81106 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-26 00:21:30
0
To see more videos from user @hninmaung374, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

In 2010, Gap spent a reported $100 million on a new logo and scrapped it six days later. It's one of the most expensive branding failures in history, and the reason it flopped is a lesson every established brand needs before their own rebrand. First, let me be clear: I am all for rebrands. They're one of the most powerful things an established brand can do. Gap's problem was never that they rebranded. It's HOW they did it. Here's what happened. Gap had decades of equity in its iconic look, the white serif
In 2010, Gap spent a reported $100 million on a new logo and scrapped it six days later. It's one of the most expensive branding failures in history, and the reason it flopped is a lesson every established brand needs before their own rebrand. First, let me be clear: I am all for rebrands. They're one of the most powerful things an established brand can do. Gap's problem was never that they rebranded. It's HOW they did it. Here's what happened. Gap had decades of equity in its iconic look, the white serif "Gap" tucked inside that navy blue box. People recognized it instantly. Then, after a sales slump and honestly some internal boredom with a logo they'd had for 20 years, they decided it needed to feel more modern. So with no warning, no campaign, and no explanation, they swapped it for "Gap" in plain black Helvetica with a tiny gradient blue square. The internet erupted. Thousands of complaints, parody accounts, a mock logo generator. Six days later, Gap reversed course and went back to the original. So what actually went wrong? First, they threw away decades of recognition for no strategic reason. That blue box was an asset people knew on sight, and recognition is directly tied to revenue. They tossed it just to look "modern." Second, the new logo was generic, it looked like a placeholder, not a brand with 40 years of heritage. They traded something distinctive for something anyone could make. And third, the biggest one: there was no strategy underneath it. When the backlash hit, instead of standing behind their choice, they asked the public to crowdsource a new one. That single move proved there was never a real foundation to begin with. If you can't explain why every choice was made, you fold the second someone pushes back. Here's the real takeaway, and it's not "don't rebrand." Rebranding is exactly what you should do when you've grown or your brand no longer fits where you're headed. A strategic rebrand sharpens the equity you've already built instead of throwing it away, every choice is backed by a reason, and you can stand behind it with total conviction. That's the difference between Gap's $100 million mistake and a rebrand that actually levels you up. What brand should I break down next? Drop it in the comments. #greenscreen #brandstrategy #gap #brandstrategist #entrepreneurtok @Gap

About