@golddamusica_: Peão todo tatuado 🎶🔥 #reyvaqueiro

GOLD DA MÚSICA  🎶
GOLD DA MÚSICA 🎶
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Wednesday 26 August 2026 01:56:10 GMT
40484
6866
14
349

Music

Download

Comments

clemeilda.silva
Clemeilda Silva :
gordinho e bom
2026-08-26 11:09:58
0
las122068
las122068 :
REY VAQUEIRO É FODA
2026-08-27 09:29:23
0
josenilsonflores
josenilsonflores :
toma essa pedrada 🤠
2026-08-26 17:23:40
0
jheimes.rodrigues
Jheimes rodrigues Rodrigues :
grande rey vaqueiro 🤠
2026-08-26 10:37:14
0
bruno_nascimento34
Bruno88 :
top
2026-08-26 09:29:11
0
neidemorais292
neide :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-26 21:21:54
0
liviabandeira10
Livia Alves :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-26 03:45:13
0
vinilpslps
vini da mídia :
🔥🔥🔥
2026-08-28 14:50:06
0
To see more videos from user @golddamusica_, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

After watching the impeachment trial, I honestly felt disappointed. Until now, Senator Robin Padilla is still defending Sara Duterte because she insisted that using an alias is legal. For me, the fact that an alias is legal is not the main issue. What matters is why the alias was used, who was using it, and in what situation it was used. There are various reasons why a person might use an alias. An alias can be used to identify a person as a leader or as part of an organization. An alias can be used to protect someone's identity or keep a person safe. An alias can also simply be a name that a person prefers to use because it is easier for people to remember or recognize. And sometimes, an alias is simply a nickname used by friends, family, or people close to that person. But above all, I don't know if Senator Robin Padilla understands the point of the questions he is asking the prosecution about the aliases of the heroes he mentioned—Dimasalang, Siling Labuyo, Tikbalang, Taga-Ilog, May Pag-asa, Buwan, Magalon, Lakambini, Paralitiko, Alipato, and others. In my opinion, those questions do not really address the main issue. If I were answering Senator Padilla, I would simply say: The heroes you mentioned—we know who these real people were, and they were not involved in confidential funds. But the people whose names or aliases appear in connection with these confidential funds are different. None of us watching this impeachment trial knows who these real people actually are. That, for me, is the important distinction. The question is not simply, “Is using an alias legal?” The more important questions are: Who are these people? Why were aliases used? Why were these aliases connected to confidential funds? And where is the evidence showing who these individuals really are and what they actually did? That is why comparing the aliases of historical heroes with unidentified people connected to confidential funds does not, in my opinion, answer the real issue. #Senatehearing #RobinPadilla #SaraDuterte #ImpeachmentTrial #ConfidentialFunds
After watching the impeachment trial, I honestly felt disappointed. Until now, Senator Robin Padilla is still defending Sara Duterte because she insisted that using an alias is legal. For me, the fact that an alias is legal is not the main issue. What matters is why the alias was used, who was using it, and in what situation it was used. There are various reasons why a person might use an alias. An alias can be used to identify a person as a leader or as part of an organization. An alias can be used to protect someone's identity or keep a person safe. An alias can also simply be a name that a person prefers to use because it is easier for people to remember or recognize. And sometimes, an alias is simply a nickname used by friends, family, or people close to that person. But above all, I don't know if Senator Robin Padilla understands the point of the questions he is asking the prosecution about the aliases of the heroes he mentioned—Dimasalang, Siling Labuyo, Tikbalang, Taga-Ilog, May Pag-asa, Buwan, Magalon, Lakambini, Paralitiko, Alipato, and others. In my opinion, those questions do not really address the main issue. If I were answering Senator Padilla, I would simply say: The heroes you mentioned—we know who these real people were, and they were not involved in confidential funds. But the people whose names or aliases appear in connection with these confidential funds are different. None of us watching this impeachment trial knows who these real people actually are. That, for me, is the important distinction. The question is not simply, “Is using an alias legal?” The more important questions are: Who are these people? Why were aliases used? Why were these aliases connected to confidential funds? And where is the evidence showing who these individuals really are and what they actually did? That is why comparing the aliases of historical heroes with unidentified people connected to confidential funds does not, in my opinion, answer the real issue. #Senatehearing #RobinPadilla #SaraDuterte #ImpeachmentTrial #ConfidentialFunds

About