@tragos199: #india #dna #ancestry

lovelyman :

Aryana was the name for Ancient Afghanistan

राघव कुमार 🇮🇳🪷🕉️ :

there are dark skinned brahmins bro 😭✌️

RavenousTruckster :

We were indians and such

The Academy for Sanatan Dharm :

Indians come in all color shapes and sizes🥰💖🙏 Not different ethnicities. Yes that might be there as well.

𓀟 :

the first girl is gujju

Atlantic5599 :

After seeing his bs Egypt video full of misinformation I don't trust these videos.

vansh वंश ونش :

caste are not ethnic groups I am dalit and light skinned with brown eyes 😂😂

Lala123 :

Not really some are tanned due to farming and change colour in winter

Yellow :

there are certain groups with over 40% steppe which is exceptionally high

XYQ12 :

The Sacred :

[Sticker] absolutely true

k_24699452 :

Blue and green eyes aren’t as uncommon as you’d think in India. Most people know of at least a few “cat eyed” people as we call them in the South. I have several in my extended family

Cornelius.dl :

None of this is true😭

FurryApple101 :

Poorly researched

NATIVE.AMERICAИ :

I am Indian & Somalian & Israelian

_loyalhart :

Mahabarata timeline doesn't match Aryan arrivals 🤔

Harry :

" Caste related a colourism " unrepost

XYQ12 :

Please learn the basic genetics before making these claims. A lower percentage of Iranian-related or Steppe-related ancestry in one person does not, by itself, prove more recent mixing, nor does it prove that every generation in that person’s family had progressively lower percentages in the past. An individual’s ancestry result is not a genetic record of every parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, or earlier ancestor. A lower percentage also does not scientifically translate into “lower caste.” Caste is a historical and social classification, not a genetic percentage scale in which having more or less AASI-related, Iranian-related, or Steppe-related ancestry automatically determines someone’s caste. If you claim that a specific ancestry percentage makes someone Dalit or Shudra, then provide the Sanskrit text, chapter, and verse that actually establishes such a DNA-percentage rule. My individual ancestry percentage also does not tell you the exact ancestry percentages of my entire family line. My grandparents, great-grandparents, and earlier ancestors could have had higher or lower proportions of AASI-related, Iranian-related, or Steppe-related ancestry than I ultimately inherited. I inherited only portions of their DNA through successive generations, with recombination reshuffling the DNA that gets passed down. Therefore, you cannot take my present-day percentage and project it backward as though every ancestor in my family had the same percentage, or use my percentage alone to determine when particular ancestry entered my family. Most importantly, ancestry percentages are not caste percentages. Having a lower or higher percentage of one ancient ancestry component does not, by itself, make someone a higher or lower caste.

Liu Bei 刘备 :

saar

Siddha SATURN🪐 :

XYQ12 :

First of all, Sanskrit texts do not mention genetic ancestry percentages for Dalits or Shudras. Secondly, Dalit and Shudra identities were not determined by genetic percentages, nor were they based on being purely AASI. You keep implying that people with higher Iranian-related or Steppe-related ancestry could not be Dalits or Shudras, as though only people with high AASI ancestry could belong to those groups. Basically, you’re making the same claim indirectly over and over again. By the way, cousins can inherit different ancestry percentages, so one cousin may have a higher percentage of a particular ancestry component while another has a lower percentage. They can also look very different from each other. One may strongly resemble a parent or grandparent, while another may inherit a different combination of features and not closely resemble any one relative. The same applies to siblings: one sibling may look more like one parent, while another may inherit features that resemble a grandparent or other relatives. However, someone appearing more “AASI-leaning” because they inherited certain features from a grandparent does not necessarily mean that they have a substantially higher percentage of AASI-related ancestry. The same applies to Iranian-related and Steppe-related ancestry. Physical appearance and overall ancestry percentages do not correspond in a simple one-to-one way, so you cannot reliably determine someone’s ancestry percentages just by looking at them.

ashlhn55 :

Nigga is confusing ethnicity/regionalism with caste. Caste has nothing to do with color. There are black brahmins in south like vivek ramaswamy and light skinned dalits in north.

Victor arya :

Nobody got conquered what are you talking about? Get your story straight bro they migrated and merged with us

happykon :

Indians are mixed race !!!!

ai :

ok so, 1st, "Aryans" were not european or modern day white, they were central Asians initially 2nd ,it's not "conquering" that's false, it's more or else migration. there might been fights but not as "Aryans" vs "Dravidians" rather just tribes vs tribes, one side could have both Aryan and Dravidian tribes combined etc. 3rd, Aryans invaded europe and subjugated european farmers but these Aryans were or different sub haplogroup , R1b, the Indian Aryans who migrated were of R1a. 4th, this has nothing to do with modern day whites ,idk why they even take this up 😭😂