abc7chicago
Region: US
Thursday 27 August 2026 15:16:10 GMT
202585
5065
508
61
Music
Download
Comments
Madison :
anyone following and watching the trial daily knows that there is a lot of things not adding up and lack of evidence. no one’s defending a killer but kinda hard to ignore flaws in this case & basically no investigation other than “patrick said” lol
2026-08-27 15:36:15
1496
Sarah_Lou :
Actually, he demonstrated the gross lack of investigation and evidentiary testing in this case and how they have no actual evidence beyond "patrick said."
2026-08-27 16:02:29
1278
SJGS :
Every single Prosecution's witness used the phrase: Patrick said. Including the experts.
2026-08-27 16:30:07
470
user529889723180 :
She was nonadherent to the meds, would often say she self discontinued them because she didn’t like it and then would demand something else, hence why it was that way. His lack of understanding and attempts at spinning medical care to look like the fault is atrocious
2026-08-27 22:26:28
1
Marianp :
So much evidence was not tested and was ignored. I wonder why?
2026-08-27 22:18:35
0
Elizabeth 🥓🎨 :
She didn't even test at a therapeutic level for those meds, so no, it wasn't "the medications". SHE did this.
2026-08-27 16:37:21
62
Ronpr de nadie🇵🇷 :
Saying there was "no investigation other than what Patrick said" completely misinterprets the reality of this trial. The Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab conducted a massive, independent forensic investigation, uncovering her digital diaries, tracking her phone's GPS data, and pulling her clean DNA profiles directly from the scene. The only reason the jury isn't seeing a massive mountain of police photos and forensics is because Lindsay’s own defense team signed a formal legal agreement (a stipulation) admitting she committed the physical acts. Under Massachusetts Rule 14b2, when a defendant formally concedes the physical actions, the law skips past the "who-done-it" police investigation phase entirely. There are no flaws or missing evidence; the trial is 100% about psychiatric doctors determining her sanity, not detectives trying to solve a mystery that both sides have already legally agreed upon. Also Patrick Clancy’s phone WAS fully seized and extracted by police, and the claim that he refused to cooperate is a complete lie invented by social media creators.
2026-08-27 17:14:41
36
mushajazzist2 :
So basically anyone now can do a murder and blame it on pills?
2026-08-27 16:44:39
19
Amy Klamczynski :
You mean he didn’t blame Patrick 🫠
2026-08-27 17:53:33
9
Christian Jones :
notice he didnt blame Patrick. in fact, he talked about the pain he was going through finding his kids murdered.
2026-08-27 17:04:26
19
TR@305 :
If her husband knew his wife was very ill why didn't he get help for her and for his kids live in nanny they apparently have money he should also be tried for child neglect knowing his wife was mentally ill.
2026-08-27 16:07:43
110
04 :
⚖️INNOCENT⚖️
2026-08-27 21:39:15
0
Sherry :
Justice for Lindsey 💗 💗💗💗💗
2026-08-27 16:37:33
13
Lex Rex :
So no ammonium thioglycolate moment?? -Legally Blonde
2026-08-27 17:22:58
16
jadelucydiamond :
I just watched closings, neither party was particularly convincing to be honest. However, the prosecution was a tad MORE convincing in confirming my belief that Lindsay was suffering extreme mental health issues and likely still is, albeit heavily medicated. Whether we can say she did it, and if she did, whether she was criminally responsible - the facts don’t seem to support either argument.
2026-08-27 16:31:25
11
atta.bean :
The prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay acted maliciously with intent and sound mind according to the charges. They have not done so, cannot do so, as they did not investigate properly in order to do so or prove otherwise. The state still had an obligation to test and to gather any and all evidences. They did not. There is high reasonable doubt that she could have or would have acted according to the charges. That is what the trial is about. Lindsay pleaded not guilty. Lindsay was informed that she did those things and has no recollection of any of it. Much of the prosecuting witness statements have been, ‘Patrick said’. If the prosecution cannot prove beyond doubt … she cannot be charged according to the law. Now is there evidence that someone else could have orchestrated it all? Yes. Could someone else have done it all? Yes. Even with all of the evidence that points to someone else doing it, let’s say she did in fact do as charged, can she still be found not guilty? Yes. The defense has shown plenty of evidence and counter argument that provides a great deal of reasonable doubt. Guilty as charged? No.
2026-08-27 16:17:38
46
Mary :
The prosecutor just blew it out out of the park. Good luck defense.
2026-08-27 16:07:20
5
🐩Love for Dogs🐩 :
She was failed by her doctor's, husband, and law enforcement.
2026-08-27 17:36:50
6
susanleek1130 :
Plus tge fact there was NO INVESTIGATION TGEY BELIEVED WHAT PATRICK SAID
2026-08-27 17:40:04
11
tongasmoov650 :
Wait but I thought he was supposed to drop a bombshell? What happened to that?😭
2026-08-27 16:47:20
14
𝔎𝔦𝔪𝔟𝔢𝔯𝔩𝔶 :
Lindsay Clancy needs to pay for killing those sweet children.
2026-08-27 16:16:51
129
dreamer’s dream :
How did she tell him anything if she could not speak?
2026-08-27 17:31:11
14
FriendlyProtectiveMom :
The prosecution is currently giving their closing arguments and the defense goes after. So…
2026-08-27 15:43:41
5
sugar🩷spice :
let's hope prison and they throw away key
2026-08-27 16:33:54
89
To see more videos from user @abc7chicago, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
