@gapingustitch: Something can be legal under the law, but that does not automatically make it right for the environment. A licence determines what humans are permitted to do. It does not mean that clearing a forest comes without consequences for the wildlife that depends on it. A forest is not simply a collection of trees. It is a home. It is a source of food and shelter. It is a pathway travelled by generations of wildlife. It is an ecosystem where countless lives exist alongside one another. When forests are logged, cleared, fragmented by roads, converted into plantations or taken over by development, animals do not understand the new boundaries humans have drawn on maps. An elephant does not know that the forest it once travelled through has been rezoned. A bear does not know that the place where it once searched for food now belongs to someone. Nobody held a meeting with them and said, “From today onwards, this is no longer your home.” And yet, when these animals continue using the land they have known for generations, we say: “Elephants are entering our villages.” “Bears are coming into residential areas.” “Wild animals are encroaching on human settlements.” But perhaps we need to turn that question around. Are they really entering our territory, or have we been expanding deeper and deeper into theirs? This does not mean I blame the villagers. People have every right to be frightened when elephants appear near their homes or schools. Their crops, livelihoods and families deserve protection too. In many ways, local communities and wildlife are both caught in a much larger problem created by how we manage and alter the landscape around them. What troubles me is the cycle: Forest disappears → wildlife loses space and food → wildlife enters human settlements → wildlife is labelled a problem → wildlife is captured and relocated. And then we repeat it. Eventually, we have to ask: When we have taken every suitable place from them, where exactly are we going to relocate them next? That is why Sulong’s story affects me so deeply. The more I learn about what happened before he was captured, the harder it becomes for me to see him simply as “a troublesome elephant that entered a village and had to be relocated.” I see an animal living in a landscape that has been changing around him. He cannot walk into a land office and question what happened to his habitat. He cannot object to a development project. He cannot read an environmental impact assessment. He cannot tell us, “The place where I used to find food is gone.” All he can do is walk. And now, that is exactly what so many of us are watching. Sulong is walking. 🐘 I don’t know what is going through his mind, and I don’t want to romanticise his journey by pretending that I do. But his footsteps are forcing us to look at something that is usually very easy to ignore. Wild animals are not invaders simply because human boundaries have changed around them. They were here too. They have histories in these forests, pathways they remember, places where they feed, families and social bonds of their own, and landscapes their species depended upon long before our roads and fences divided them. Perhaps Sulong’s journey should not only make us ask, “Will he make it home?” Perhaps it should also make us ask: “How much of his home will still be there when he does?” Because humans are not the only ones who need somewhere safe to belong. Wildlife needs a place to come home to, too. 🌳🐘🤍 #sulong #sulongchalil #elephant #gajah

142

To see more videos from user @gapingustitch, please go to the Tikwm homepage.