@karirbag: Kalian wajib banget punya tas ini buat mempermudah barang bawaanmu🥰✨ #karirbag #taswanita #taskerja #carrykarir

Karirbag
Karirbag
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Saturday 29 August 2026 13:45:00 GMT
142
0
0
0

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @karirbag, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

There was no rainstorm. That is the first thing to understand about what happened in Nepal. Weather analysis of satellite and station data shows no widespread intense rainfall near the area in the week before the flood. Nepal's own flood authorities said rainfall in Rasuwa could not explain the scale or the suddenness of what happened. A leading climate researcher at Kathmandu University ruled out heavy rain as the main cause outright. So where did a wall of water, ice, and rock come from on a day that was not even raining? Here is what the evidence currently points to, explained properly. Roughly 20 kilometres northeast of the Rasuwagadhi border crossing, high in the mountains along the Nepal-China border, an enormous mass of ice and rock broke loose and fell. It landed in a river called the Lhende Khola, a tributary that feeds the Bhote Koshi. And it blocked it. That single fact is the whole disaster. A river does not stop when you block it. It keeps arriving. The water simply begins piling up behind the obstruction, and what forms is a lake that has no business existing, held back by a wall of loose ice, rock, and debris that nobody designed and nobody is monitoring. Professor Rijan Bhakta Kayastha of Kathmandu University described exactly this from the imagery. An icefall and landslide can be seen, he said. An ice and debris lake formed and then burst. A dam was formed. Now understand why these natural dams are so lethal. A concrete dam is engineered. It has spillways to release pressure gradually, it has monitoring, and it fails slowly if it fails at all. A dam made of collapsed ice and rubble has none of that. It holds, and holds, and then it does not hold. As one hazard researcher put it, these glacial dams are no different to constructed dams, except nobody built them and nobody is watching them. When it gave way, everything released at once. And here is the detail that explains why the destruction was so total. Nepali officials noted that the released water carried an enormous volume of debris with it. In their assessment, if it had been only clear water, it would not have caused this level of destruction. That distinction matters more than people realise. Clear water flows around obstacles. A debris flow is a moving wall of rock, boulders, ice, mud, and shattered trees travelling at speed. It does not flow past a building. It removes it. It is closer to a landslide that happens to be liquid than to a flood in the way most of us picture one. Now, what triggered the avalanche in the first place remains genuinely unresolved, and there are three competing explanations. The first is an earthquake. Nepal's Foreign Minister said a magnitude 4.4 quake was recorded at 8:37 that morning in Tibetan territory, roughly 47 kilometres north of Gosainkunda, and the USGS confirms the event. The theory is that the shaking dislodged the ice and rock. Officials have been careful to say it is still unclear whether the earthquake played any role. The second is a glacial lake outburst flood, or GLOF. This happens when a lake formed by a retreating glacier, held back by a natural wall of loose moraine or ice, suddenly fails and empties. This is what caused a strikingly similar flood on this exact same river system on July 8 last year. Scientists are examining whether it contributed here too, and Kayastha noted that the area contains several large glacial lakes and that the Lhende was blocked in a similar incident last year. But this is where the experts openly disagree, and honesty requires reporting that. A geomorphologist at the Freie Universität Berlin told CNN that satellite imagery so far suggests no major lakes sit upstream of the flood path, which in his assessment allows a glacial lake outburst to be excluded. The third possibility is simply structural failure. Ice and rock in high mountains are held together in part by permafrost, ground that has stayed frozen for centuries. As high-altitude temperatures rise, that frozen cement thaws, and slopes th
There was no rainstorm. That is the first thing to understand about what happened in Nepal. Weather analysis of satellite and station data shows no widespread intense rainfall near the area in the week before the flood. Nepal's own flood authorities said rainfall in Rasuwa could not explain the scale or the suddenness of what happened. A leading climate researcher at Kathmandu University ruled out heavy rain as the main cause outright. So where did a wall of water, ice, and rock come from on a day that was not even raining? Here is what the evidence currently points to, explained properly. Roughly 20 kilometres northeast of the Rasuwagadhi border crossing, high in the mountains along the Nepal-China border, an enormous mass of ice and rock broke loose and fell. It landed in a river called the Lhende Khola, a tributary that feeds the Bhote Koshi. And it blocked it. That single fact is the whole disaster. A river does not stop when you block it. It keeps arriving. The water simply begins piling up behind the obstruction, and what forms is a lake that has no business existing, held back by a wall of loose ice, rock, and debris that nobody designed and nobody is monitoring. Professor Rijan Bhakta Kayastha of Kathmandu University described exactly this from the imagery. An icefall and landslide can be seen, he said. An ice and debris lake formed and then burst. A dam was formed. Now understand why these natural dams are so lethal. A concrete dam is engineered. It has spillways to release pressure gradually, it has monitoring, and it fails slowly if it fails at all. A dam made of collapsed ice and rubble has none of that. It holds, and holds, and then it does not hold. As one hazard researcher put it, these glacial dams are no different to constructed dams, except nobody built them and nobody is watching them. When it gave way, everything released at once. And here is the detail that explains why the destruction was so total. Nepali officials noted that the released water carried an enormous volume of debris with it. In their assessment, if it had been only clear water, it would not have caused this level of destruction. That distinction matters more than people realise. Clear water flows around obstacles. A debris flow is a moving wall of rock, boulders, ice, mud, and shattered trees travelling at speed. It does not flow past a building. It removes it. It is closer to a landslide that happens to be liquid than to a flood in the way most of us picture one. Now, what triggered the avalanche in the first place remains genuinely unresolved, and there are three competing explanations. The first is an earthquake. Nepal's Foreign Minister said a magnitude 4.4 quake was recorded at 8:37 that morning in Tibetan territory, roughly 47 kilometres north of Gosainkunda, and the USGS confirms the event. The theory is that the shaking dislodged the ice and rock. Officials have been careful to say it is still unclear whether the earthquake played any role. The second is a glacial lake outburst flood, or GLOF. This happens when a lake formed by a retreating glacier, held back by a natural wall of loose moraine or ice, suddenly fails and empties. This is what caused a strikingly similar flood on this exact same river system on July 8 last year. Scientists are examining whether it contributed here too, and Kayastha noted that the area contains several large glacial lakes and that the Lhende was blocked in a similar incident last year. But this is where the experts openly disagree, and honesty requires reporting that. A geomorphologist at the Freie Universität Berlin told CNN that satellite imagery so far suggests no major lakes sit upstream of the flood path, which in his assessment allows a glacial lake outburst to be excluded. The third possibility is simply structural failure. Ice and rock in high mountains are held together in part by permafrost, ground that has stayed frozen for centuries. As high-altitude temperatures rise, that frozen cement thaws, and slopes th

About