Quick Thoughts
Region: US
Saturday 29 August 2026 17:51:22 GMT
160249
10869
3308
234
Music
Download
Comments
ghostieszs :
Nice try, but he said his view is objective, thereby invalidating your data.
2026-08-29 18:02:01
4163
Pete from Malört & Savior :
I cannot stand when people say “objectively” to mean “I feel very strongly about this”
2026-08-29 20:31:53
1350
ultimate_endurance :
He's just angry because Rowling believes a woman is specifically a biological adult female.
2026-08-29 20:16:08
1531
Kupferdach :
popular ≠ good
2026-08-30 06:10:06
362
Will :
You don’t understand — he emphasizes all of his consonant sounds, which means he’s smart and right about everything
2026-08-29 18:23:41
1286
gamer_trex :
“I hate the artist so the art must be bad” 💀
2026-08-29 20:20:16
842
Cameron Martin :
He's objectively wrong in his use of the word objective
2026-08-29 22:25:47
424
Scrollcrazy :
Objectively, say less
2026-08-29 18:50:59
354
jejdjdjdkslskswjjsk :
Defeats Voldemort? Put a spoiler warning next time, dude 🙄
2026-08-29 18:03:21
443
Dav Dave :
appealing to sales and popularity is never ever a strong argument for the merit of art. also gesturing at rejection in an art field is ridiculous. piercing the veil of publication is a .01% feet that speaks nothing to quality and everything to vendibility. this guy is just guffawing because he hates jk Rowling as a person but if there are objective metrics by which the artistry of writing can be evaluated, neither of you are interrogating them. this is by far the weakest argument I've ever heard you present which is only to say I like you and am not a routine hater of your work.
2026-08-30 03:52:47
38
anime4sd :
🙄🙄🙄🙄 Good writing is not meassured in how often is it read.
2026-08-29 21:20:39
34
VaeVictisBD :
'Most Read' doesn't mean 'Most Good.' He's still correct in saying it's objectively bad.
2026-08-30 00:19:39
19
Jake-son-Fantasy📚✝️ :
He literally just explained why your argument isn’t addressing what he said. They’re popular, yes. In terms of the traditional definition of well written literature, they suck.
2026-08-31 01:15:55
10
lore_maker :
we're in the big 26 and yall think popularity is a metric of quality? that I'm itself is incoherent as a baseline. it's like arguing what people eat the most equates to how healthy it is and you see mac Donald's topping the charts and then asserting it is the healthiest option avaliable. "they're saying this fast food restaurant is bad for your health because insurmountable amount of health risks but its clearly objectively good for you because of the amount time spend in them". I'm not really supporting the other guy as his argument shouldn't have been so vague but this video is objectively much worst as the sole argumentation is "more popular = more good"
2026-08-30 07:46:25
20
👾 :
Ok so your whole defense is solely based on the popularity of the books?
2026-08-30 15:14:02
6
Petal :
You’re confusing popularity with quality 👍
2026-08-30 08:02:33
14
ryans5302 :
30 seconds into the video and your already making an argumentum ad populum (popularity fallacy)
2026-08-29 20:42:57
18
Rob Lee :
most people eat junk food. and it's not good for you.
2026-08-29 22:24:00
6
Gray :
Popularity does not make the books well written. They aren’t.
2026-08-29 21:47:41
621
yahoo :
Popular does not mean good tho does it
2026-08-31 10:35:23
12
Beau :
Most read does not = good.
2026-08-30 02:36:57
196
🌈⃤.Kife :
Temu makes 60 billion a year. Does that mean what they sell is objectively high quality? Gordon Ramsey restaurants make 200 million a year. McDonalds makes 30 billion a year, does that mean McDonald’s is 150 times higher quality than Gordon Ramsay’s food?
2026-08-30 04:20:44
103
manio_e :
popularity is not in any way correlative to quality 😭😭
2026-08-30 14:28:00
6
Der Vater :
How good that you cut out the part of the video where he explains that popularity doesn't equate to quality. Otherwise your argument completely falls apart.
2026-08-30 00:09:15
184
To see more videos from user @lthlnkso, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
