@dakakal:

Дамир,как? | Политика

Open In TikTok:

Region: FR

Sunday 30 August 2026 04:40:00 GMT

88674

6269

388

2159

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (27.33MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (18.07MB) Watermark .mp4 (28.61MB) Music .mp3

Comments

𝐁𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒™|Мелкий :

слава Богу её сняли

2026-08-30 10:21:41

2685

smlle :

Как же хорошо что сняли, будем дальше терпеть💪💪💪💪💪

2026-08-30 20:22:42

34

brynzahenh :

стоит сказать "я против войны" и за твою партию будут топить, соей очень легко манипулировать

2026-08-30 12:28:26

904

XXI | XLVII :

Никто не говорит "яблоко хорошая партия" скорее как то так "все остальное ещё хуже"

2026-08-30 12:28:22

391

Ok :

Ну да конечно давай за войну и тд

2026-08-30 21:12:21

24

шпротер из Челябинска :

Не, они уже дно пробили еще сильнее

2026-08-30 06:12:50

729

libraser :

Как ты умудрился подвязать политические взгляды к ориентации?

2026-08-30 19:10:29

12

DDR4 Fyru Beast Kingston :

Это я смотрю на фанатов партии яблоко в 2026 году.

2026-08-30 15:38:42

45

гений :

уж лучше движуха,чем яблоко

2026-08-30 15:38:38

30

Zaorus :

снятие яблока - показательный момент политических возможностей а РФ

2026-08-30 12:51:38

92

Лемочка :

самые натуральные фанаты яблока

2026-08-30 11:50:04

74

s21 :

Люди реально верят в завершение конфликта из за того что какая-то партия выиграет …

2026-08-30 14:53:29

34

Ник@ :

Людям надоело все это. Все хотят мира и все.

2026-08-30 14:35:03

52

Jkznn :

слава богу их сняли с выборов

2026-08-30 19:32:47

16

dyrfedrlzyr3 :

"все партии за равной степени за мир ой то есть за победу в россии" ты определись пожалуйста мир это конец войны прямо сейчас/ближайшее время а победа это когда то там будет может пол года может год может два

2026-08-30 13:05:40

12

АНТИ ФУРРИ КОАЛИЦИЯ ГМОДА :

2026-08-30 12:12:40

49

СОЗДАТЕЛЬ МАИНКРАВТА :

ну а за кого им голосовать? кпрф?

2026-08-30 17:01:29

18

izrobat :

мы с Израиля 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 советуем русских🥰🥰🥰 голосовать Голосовать за нашу партию яблоко 🍎🍎🍎🍎

2026-08-30 12:33:05

97

To see more videos from user @dakakal, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Okuması İçin Lüks Arabasını Satan Abisine Yıllar Sonra Külüstür Araba Alan Hayırsız Kardeş ahahah #tiktok #komedi @ihsan çelik

Okuması İçin Lüks Arabasını Satan Abisine Yıllar Sonra Külüstür Araba Alan Hayırsız Kardeş ahahah #tiktok #komedi @ihsan çelik

The Dead Internet Theory: A Digital Ghost Town? The Dead Internet Theory is one of the most fascinating and controversial ideas to emerge from online culture in recent years. At its core, the theory suggests that much of the internet is no longer driven primarily by genuine human activity. Instead, proponents argue that a significant portion of online content, conversations, trends, and interactions are generated by automated systems, artificial intelligence, corporations, and coordinated influence campaigns. According to this perspective, the internet that millions of people use every day is increasingly becoming a synthetic environment where authentic human participation is being drowned out by artificial engagement. The theory generally traces its origins to discussions that appeared on internet forums in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Supporters point to a variety of observations that they believe indicate a shift in the nature of online activity. They note that many social media platforms are flooded with spam accounts, automated bots, repetitive content, and algorithmically generated posts. Comment sections often contain similar opinions repeated across thousands of accounts, while viral trends can seem strangely manufactured or coordinated. To believers, these patterns suggest that a substantial portion of what appears to be human activity may actually be produced by non-human actors. One of the strongest factors fueling the theory is the rise of artificial intelligence. Modern AI systems are capable of generating convincing text, images, videos, music, and even entire online personas. As these technologies improve, distinguishing between content created by humans and content created by machines becomes increasingly difficult. An internet user scrolling through social media may encounter AI-generated artwork, automated news summaries, chatbot-written comments, and synthetic influencers without realizing it. The existence of such technologies lends a degree of plausibility to some aspects of the theory, even if its more extreme claims remain unproven. Another argument commonly cited by supporters involves the changing nature of online discovery. In the early days of the internet, users often explored independently through personal websites, niche forums, blogs, and fan communities. Today, however, much of online activity is filtered through recommendation algorithms controlled by large technology companies. These algorithms determine what users see, which creators gain visibility, and what conversations become popular. Critics argue that this centralized control creates the illusion of organic public opinion while heavily influencing what information spreads. To some, this feels less like an open network of human communication and more like a curated digital ecosystem. The theory also intersects with concerns about misinformation and influence operations. Governments, political organizations, corporations, and interest groups have all been documented using fake accounts, automated networks, and coordinated campaigns to shape public perception. While these activities do not prove that the internet is “dead,” they demonstrate that non-human and organized actors can significantly affect online discourse. Supporters of the theory often point to these examples as evidence that genuine public conversations are increasingly difficult to separate from engineered narratives. Despite its intriguing claims, most experts reject the strongest versions of the Dead Internet Theory. Researchers acknowledge that bots, AI-generated content, and coordinated campaigns exist, but they argue that billions of real people continue to actively use the internet every day. Social media platforms, messaging apps, online gaming communities, video calls, livestreams, and countless forums remain populated by authentic users. The theory’s suggestion that most online activity is artificial lacks credible evidence and is generally considered an exaggeration o

The Dead Internet Theory: A Digital Ghost Town? The Dead Internet Theory is one of the most fascinating and controversial ideas to emerge from online culture in recent years. At its core, the theory suggests that much of the internet is no longer driven primarily by genuine human activity. Instead, proponents argue that a significant portion of online content, conversations, trends, and interactions are generated by automated systems, artificial intelligence, corporations, and coordinated influence campaigns. According to this perspective, the internet that millions of people use every day is increasingly becoming a synthetic environment where authentic human participation is being drowned out by artificial engagement. The theory generally traces its origins to discussions that appeared on internet forums in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Supporters point to a variety of observations that they believe indicate a shift in the nature of online activity. They note that many social media platforms are flooded with spam accounts, automated bots, repetitive content, and algorithmically generated posts. Comment sections often contain similar opinions repeated across thousands of accounts, while viral trends can seem strangely manufactured or coordinated. To believers, these patterns suggest that a substantial portion of what appears to be human activity may actually be produced by non-human actors. One of the strongest factors fueling the theory is the rise of artificial intelligence. Modern AI systems are capable of generating convincing text, images, videos, music, and even entire online personas. As these technologies improve, distinguishing between content created by humans and content created by machines becomes increasingly difficult. An internet user scrolling through social media may encounter AI-generated artwork, automated news summaries, chatbot-written comments, and synthetic influencers without realizing it. The existence of such technologies lends a degree of plausibility to some aspects of the theory, even if its more extreme claims remain unproven. Another argument commonly cited by supporters involves the changing nature of online discovery. In the early days of the internet, users often explored independently through personal websites, niche forums, blogs, and fan communities. Today, however, much of online activity is filtered through recommendation algorithms controlled by large technology companies. These algorithms determine what users see, which creators gain visibility, and what conversations become popular. Critics argue that this centralized control creates the illusion of organic public opinion while heavily influencing what information spreads. To some, this feels less like an open network of human communication and more like a curated digital ecosystem. The theory also intersects with concerns about misinformation and influence operations. Governments, political organizations, corporations, and interest groups have all been documented using fake accounts, automated networks, and coordinated campaigns to shape public perception. While these activities do not prove that the internet is “dead,” they demonstrate that non-human and organized actors can significantly affect online discourse. Supporters of the theory often point to these examples as evidence that genuine public conversations are increasingly difficult to separate from engineered narratives. Despite its intriguing claims, most experts reject the strongest versions of the Dead Internet Theory. Researchers acknowledge that bots, AI-generated content, and coordinated campaigns exist, but they argue that billions of real people continue to actively use the internet every day. Social media platforms, messaging apps, online gaming communities, video calls, livestreams, and countless forums remain populated by authentic users. The theory’s suggestion that most online activity is artificial lacks credible evidence and is generally considered an exaggeration o

#cejour-là #decoration #amenagement #foryourpage @Chantre

#cejour-là #decoration #amenagement #foryourpage @Chantre

ESSAS SÃO AS MÚSICAS +18 DO GEEK #takr #rapgeek #geek

ESSAS SÃO AS MÚSICAS +18 DO GEEK #takr #rapgeek #geek

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy