@legitalgorithmswithpeter: Test automation with Playwright — what does it actually do? 🎭🧪 Imagine manually testing your login, search, cart, and checkout flow after every code change. 😭 That’s where Playwright comes in. 🚀 It’s a browser automation and end-to-end testing framework that can control Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. Your test can: 🌐 Open the website 📧 Enter login credentials 🖱️ Click buttons 🛒 Add products to a cart ✅ Verify that the expected result actually appears And Playwright does more than just click buttons. ⏳ Automatic waiting 🔍 Reliable locators 🌐 Network request mocking 🧑‍💻 Isolated browser contexts ⚡ Parallel test execution 📸 Screenshots, videos, and traces for debugging You can even add it to your CI/CD pipeline so every important code change automatically tests critical user journeys before deployment. 🤖 But don’t use Playwright for everything. ⚙️ Unit tests → Individual functions 🔗 Integration tests → Components working together 🎭 Playwright → Critical end-to-end user workflows The goal isn’t just automation. It’s automatically proving that your application still works. 🔥 #PlaywrightTesting #EndToEndTesting #BrowserAutomation #TestAutomation #QualityEngineering

algorithmswithpeter
algorithmswithpeter
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 29 August 2026 22:46:44 GMT
1227
58
0
6

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @legitalgorithmswithpeter, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

When an interviewer says “we have millions of customer support tickets…” they’re not testing AI. they’re testing systems thinking. Here’s what that actually looks like 👇 I’d break it into 5 parts: ingestion, embeddings, retrieval, generation, monitoring 1️⃣ Ingestion is offline, not request-time At this scale, everything is async • Stream tickets from DB / event logs • Normalize messy text (typos, threads, duplicates) • Thread conversations properly (not just single messages) • Chunk by conversation flow, not fixed tokens • Attach metadata (user, product, issue type, timestamp) This NEVER touches your request path 2️⃣ Embeddings + indexing built for scale You don’t embed on demand • Batch jobs for new tickets (queue-based) • Distributed vector DB (Qdrant, Milvus, etc.) • Hybrid search (BM25 + dense vectors) • Sharding by product / issue type • Store metadata alongside vectors Key insight: metadata filtering > vector search 3️⃣ Retrieval + generation (tight path) Keep this path fast and lean: query → metadata filter → cache → hybrid search → rerank → LLM • Most queries hit cache • Many never reach vector search • Rerank small candidate sets only • Send 5–10 HIGH quality chunks More data ≠ better answers Relevance wins every time 4️⃣ Caching is everything This is where scale actually happens • FAQ cache (repeat questions) • Retrieval cache (top ticket clusters) • Embedding cache (hot queries) Real flow: query → cache → (miss) retrieve + LLM → store result This is how you cut cost AND latency 5️⃣ Monitoring closes the loop Without this, your system slowly dies • Are we retrieving the right tickets? (recall@k) • Are answers actually helpful? (feedback) • Latency + cache hit rate • Auto re-embed as new tickets come in BOTTOM LINE: RAG at this scale is NOT an AI problem it’s a search + data + caching problem Most engineers build chatbots Real AI engineers build infrastructure #aiengineer #ai #embedding #rag #softwareengineer
When an interviewer says “we have millions of customer support tickets…” they’re not testing AI. they’re testing systems thinking. Here’s what that actually looks like 👇 I’d break it into 5 parts: ingestion, embeddings, retrieval, generation, monitoring 1️⃣ Ingestion is offline, not request-time At this scale, everything is async • Stream tickets from DB / event logs • Normalize messy text (typos, threads, duplicates) • Thread conversations properly (not just single messages) • Chunk by conversation flow, not fixed tokens • Attach metadata (user, product, issue type, timestamp) This NEVER touches your request path 2️⃣ Embeddings + indexing built for scale You don’t embed on demand • Batch jobs for new tickets (queue-based) • Distributed vector DB (Qdrant, Milvus, etc.) • Hybrid search (BM25 + dense vectors) • Sharding by product / issue type • Store metadata alongside vectors Key insight: metadata filtering > vector search 3️⃣ Retrieval + generation (tight path) Keep this path fast and lean: query → metadata filter → cache → hybrid search → rerank → LLM • Most queries hit cache • Many never reach vector search • Rerank small candidate sets only • Send 5–10 HIGH quality chunks More data ≠ better answers Relevance wins every time 4️⃣ Caching is everything This is where scale actually happens • FAQ cache (repeat questions) • Retrieval cache (top ticket clusters) • Embedding cache (hot queries) Real flow: query → cache → (miss) retrieve + LLM → store result This is how you cut cost AND latency 5️⃣ Monitoring closes the loop Without this, your system slowly dies • Are we retrieving the right tickets? (recall@k) • Are answers actually helpful? (feedback) • Latency + cache hit rate • Auto re-embed as new tickets come in BOTTOM LINE: RAG at this scale is NOT an AI problem it’s a search + data + caching problem Most engineers build chatbots Real AI engineers build infrastructure #aiengineer #ai #embedding #rag #softwareengineer

About