@prettylittlebarbie247:

Vibewithme78
Vibewithme78
Open In TikTok:
Region: EG
Sunday 30 August 2026 16:46:01 GMT
375
44
0
1

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @prettylittlebarbie247, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Major win for two Sydney nurses as key evidence ruled inadmissible in anti-Semitic threats case Sydney, Australia — In a significant legal development, a New South Wales District Court judge has excluded a widely circulated viral video from the upcoming trial of two former Bankstown Hospital nurses accused of making anti-Semitic threats online.  Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 27, and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 28, have pleaded not guilty to charges including using a carriage service to menace, harass, or offend, and in one case, threatening violence. The pair made international headlines in early 2025 after a video emerged from an online conversation with Israeli influencer Max Veifer (also referred to as Max Ilinsky or similar).  In the footage, the nurses were allegedly heard saying they would refuse to treat Israeli patients and making threats of violence against them. The video spread rapidly online, leading to their dismissal from Bankstown Hospital and widespread public outrage.  However, on June 23, 2026, Judge Michael McHugh ruled that the video — recorded without the nurses’ consent via a platform like Chatroulette — was obtained illegally under NSW’s Surveillance Devices Act. The judge determined it could not be used as evidence in their trials, scheduled to begin in August.  “The evidence was obtained improperly or in contravention of Australian law,” the judge stated in his ruling. He excluded all related video recordings, describing the alleged remarks as “highly disturbing” but prioritizing legal protections around private conversations.  The decision represents a major blow to the prosecution, which had relied heavily on the footage. The case now rests more heavily on witness testimony, including potentially from the influencer himself. Defence lawyers had previously described the comments as “stupid things said by stupid people.”  Legal observers suggest the ruling could significantly weaken or even collapse the criminal case, though the nurses remain sacked and banned from practising as nurses.  The case has reignited debates in Australia about online privacy laws, the use of foreign-recorded evidence, and tensions surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict that spilled into professional settings. Both defendants maintain their innocence as the matter heads toward trial. The image circulating in media reports shows Ms Abu Lebdeh outside court, alongside a smaller inset photo from the original controversy.  This story is developing. Further updates are expected as the August trial date approaches. #austral#australia
Major win for two Sydney nurses as key evidence ruled inadmissible in anti-Semitic threats case Sydney, Australia — In a significant legal development, a New South Wales District Court judge has excluded a widely circulated viral video from the upcoming trial of two former Bankstown Hospital nurses accused of making anti-Semitic threats online. Sarah Abu Lebdeh, 27, and Ahmad Rashad Nadir, 28, have pleaded not guilty to charges including using a carriage service to menace, harass, or offend, and in one case, threatening violence. The pair made international headlines in early 2025 after a video emerged from an online conversation with Israeli influencer Max Veifer (also referred to as Max Ilinsky or similar). In the footage, the nurses were allegedly heard saying they would refuse to treat Israeli patients and making threats of violence against them. The video spread rapidly online, leading to their dismissal from Bankstown Hospital and widespread public outrage. However, on June 23, 2026, Judge Michael McHugh ruled that the video — recorded without the nurses’ consent via a platform like Chatroulette — was obtained illegally under NSW’s Surveillance Devices Act. The judge determined it could not be used as evidence in their trials, scheduled to begin in August. “The evidence was obtained improperly or in contravention of Australian law,” the judge stated in his ruling. He excluded all related video recordings, describing the alleged remarks as “highly disturbing” but prioritizing legal protections around private conversations. The decision represents a major blow to the prosecution, which had relied heavily on the footage. The case now rests more heavily on witness testimony, including potentially from the influencer himself. Defence lawyers had previously described the comments as “stupid things said by stupid people.” Legal observers suggest the ruling could significantly weaken or even collapse the criminal case, though the nurses remain sacked and banned from practising as nurses. The case has reignited debates in Australia about online privacy laws, the use of foreign-recorded evidence, and tensions surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict that spilled into professional settings. Both defendants maintain their innocence as the matter heads toward trial. The image circulating in media reports shows Ms Abu Lebdeh outside court, alongside a smaller inset photo from the original controversy. This story is developing. Further updates are expected as the August trial date approaches. #austral#australia

About