@neo.coom: we already have a death penalty

James :

Neocoom is the smartest person ever

garrett :

make a vid debating peter thiel being good

JerryFiggs :

death penalty can only be a thing if we have 100% accuracy when it comes to knowing if they did it or not

Johm Edit :

Terrible take

Nets :

fair enough 🤣😂

Oscar Erway :

We need police but they not the best we could have better

Anti-furry solider :

The chat at the time:

Garbage Human Being :

Juxtaposition

Johnny :

yeah but killing a person in the heat of the moment is much different than sitting and deliberating and choosing to kill someone. so saying i accept some potential collateral damage in violent police/swat encounters wouldn't translate to accepting the death penalty thru the court.

Tyler :

What about an unborn human that’s inconvenient for the mother?

FaZe Randex :

I defeated you in a debate about this

Finn :

Executing violence up to death is literally the first rung on the ladder of necessary capabilities for a state to exist at all.

angus :

the death penalty for an enforced punishment that is deemed as a fair consequence for one’s criminal actions. a swat team killing someone is because they are an immediate threat to another person. that is not comparable to the death penalty

Filandro :

Humans have a weird relationship with birth and death. Making babies has a cloud of naughty hanging over it because of sex, and so does making people die, because, again it's naughty. Yet both are the most important things to the survival of our species.

Jakeycoverup :

@Jakeycoverup: I have a lot I can add to the DP argument. Its great seeing someone argue for it!

DelinquentDiver :

Nauurrr

Joseph :

Stupid argument

Bwc :

The chat at this time

Nerawya :

Hi

⊙tyrant𐂂 :

WHAT HAPPENED 2 UR BEARD NOOOOO

bobancgfym1 :

no he's the smartest person who will ever be.

jmbgamercollects :

Judges are ontologically murderers

Tennis Ball :

Noooerrr

tyknutkk :