@ugocasentiniofficial: 🍇😂 Vendemmia in corso… ma quando arrivano i Carabinieri, il controllo prende una piega tutta da ridere! Tra uva, battute e buonumore, settembre comincia con un sorriso. ❤️ Sempre insieme a Roberta 🌻 Non mollare mai. 🇮🇹 Animazione ironica, realizzata con rispetto e stima per l’Arma dei Carabinieri. #UgoCasentini #Carabinieri #Vendemmia #VideoIronico #NonMollareMai

Ugo Casentini | Fede e sorrisi
Ugo Casentini | Fede e sorrisi
Open In TikTok:
Region: IT
Tuesday 01 September 2026 07:25:21 GMT
1241
29
2
3

Music

Download

Comments

ugocasentiniofficial
Ugo Casentini | Fede e sorrisi :
🍇😂 L’uva la trattengono loro… ma io continuo a controllare la pattuglia! 😄🇮🇹 Un po’ di ironia, un sorriso e la giornata parte meglio! ❤️Non mollare mai! 🌻
2026-09-01 07:25:37
1
linadellaversana0
Lina DellAversana :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-09-01 10:39:27
0
To see more videos from user @ugocasentiniofficial, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

What is Rule 130, Section 22? Under the Philippine Rules of Court, Rule 130, Section 22 establishes the Personal Knowledge Rule. It dictates that a witness can only testify about things they have actually perceived through their own senses:  What they saw with their own eyes.   What they heard with their own ears.  What they smelled, tasted, or felt. If a witness did not personally experience the event, their statement is generally considered hearsay and is inadmissible in a court of law. Breaking Down the Concept To understand how this works in practice, let's look at the contrast between what is allowed and what is not: Testimony Type  Description | Admissibility | Personal Knowledge
What is Rule 130, Section 22? Under the Philippine Rules of Court, Rule 130, Section 22 establishes the Personal Knowledge Rule. It dictates that a witness can only testify about things they have actually perceived through their own senses: What they saw with their own eyes. What they heard with their own ears. What they smelled, tasted, or felt. If a witness did not personally experience the event, their statement is generally considered hearsay and is inadmissible in a court of law. Breaking Down the Concept To understand how this works in practice, let's look at the contrast between what is allowed and what is not: Testimony Type Description | Admissibility | Personal Knowledge "I saw the delivery truck park in front of the convenience store at 11:00 AM." | Admissible (The witness perceived it directly). | | Hearsay | "My neighbor told me that he saw a delivery truck park in front of the store." Inadmissible (The witness is repeating someone else's perception). A Real-World Scenario Consider the second image provided, which shows a typical daily scene at a local convenience store (sari-sari store). If a legal dispute were to arise regarding an event at this counter—such as a disagreement over a transaction or an incident occurring right at that moment—the rules of evidence distinguish who can say what: The Person at the Counter: The individual writing or reviewing the logbook at the counter can testify about exactly what he wrote down or what he observed firsthand while standing there. The Bystander/Selfie-Taker: The person taking the photo can testify that he was physically present at the store and saw these individuals at the counter at that specific time. What is NOT Allowed: If someone who wasn't even at the store later testifies, "My friend took a selfie there and told me the guy at the counter was writing down a fake receipt," that testimony violates Section 22. Because they did not perceive the event themselves, their statement cannot be used as evidence. Why This Rule Matters The Personal Knowledge Rule exists to ensure fairness and accuracy. Cross-Examination: The opposing party has the right to cross-examine the person who actually witnessed the event to test their memory, perception, and honesty. You cannot cross-examine a witness about the reliability of a story they simply overheard. Preventing Rumors: It prevents gossip, rumors, and secondhand misinformation from influencing the court's judgment. #Rules on Evidence

About