@wbztv: The jury in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told a judge Tuesday that it is deadlocked after entering its fourth day of deliberations. WBZ News' Kristina Rex breaks down what happens when there is a hung jury in Massachusetts and the steps a judge may take before declaring a mistrial. #massachusetts #clancy

Eilidh Wells :

Having a hung jury should prove there’s ’reasonable doubt’ 😭

Raymond :

Given how huge this case has been; if it goes to retrial, how on earth are they going to find a jury who do not have some sort of preconceived idea/bias. That is going to be insanely difficult.

🖤⛓️𝔞𝔡𝔯𝔦.𝔫𝔦𝔠𝔬𝔩𝔢🥀🦇 :

If I am a juror, I'm not changing my mind to come to a unanimous decision. My decision is my decision and I will stand on it

WillowPiper4 :

If it takes this long to find guilt. Then there is obviously reasonable doubt.

Sean_26 :

The whole process is wild. You’re basically bullying the jury to change their decision, while pretending to respect their decision.

nic :

it's because Patrick isn't there to decide for them 🤷‍♀️

yeunwn :

jury debating between prison and nuthouse and tiktok is debating freedom. she ain't ever going free again.

miss.mountain :

this jury knows what theyre doing. they want a mistrial.

Contra Mundum🇻🇦☦️ :

3 men explaining to 9 women that m*rder is wrong

ShirleyUbley :

The fundamental flaw in the American Justice system’s “jury of one’s peers” is that so many Americans are so unconsciously biased on so many things that they cannot be trusted to make objective determinations in a court of law. For example, a juror with internalized (and unconscious) misogyny will see the facts of this situation radically different than a juror who does not have internalized misogyny.

Nicky :

Love the fact how this entire case is based on what Patrick SAID! The investigation was effed! Because there wasn't one!

_urmominator_ :

OHHHHH to be a FLY on that walllllllll

Indya Nino :

The problem in this case is even if she did it or not, the investigation was really no investigation at all. To find someone guilty you have to say that based on the facts you know she is 110% guilty. Due to the lack of evidence, I really don’t see how anyone can come to that conclusion.

Nøytral :

jjcostlow :

Jury should have been sequestered

flameyamy :

How is this even a hard decision? guilty she did it. End of.

Nana :

May the truth come to light and she can find some ease and relief in that

Jadeleaheaton :

They’re definitely deadlocked because there’s too much reasonable doubt for a straight up guilty verdict.

CommonSense🇺🇸 :

People in these comments “HOW CAN THEY NOT COME TO A DECISION!?.” Literally look at these comments and realize, of course they can’t. Look how polarized it is in here. There are like 4 theories, people who STILL don’t understand being innocent is not an option, people who dispute or disregard “reason by insanity” even an option. I knew it was going to be a hung jury.

Charla Bear :

They are having a hard time because their was not enough evidence in the beginning. A lot of things just don't make sense!!!

MamasMadatYouuu🇺🇸🆘 :

They should 💯 call this a mistrial. This whole trial is a sham

trumpgrl45 :

There is no physical evidence! reasonable doubt, period

annoyedaf :

Respect for others opinions when it's literally a murder case? Yeah I don't think so. If my fellow juror is being ridiculous I won't respect that. Not when someone's life is literally hanging in the balance. I won't be bullied by the other jurors or by the judges instructions. None of it will make me change my mind after I've paid close attention to all of the evidence

Fake..Justin :

Lock both the parents up. They both failed their children

Jill 🩷 :

Those poor babies have no one fighting for justice for them everyone is more concerned with their cold blooded killer