@thatgirlnamedes_: #lindsayclancycase #patrickclancy #lindsayclancystory #lindsayclancy #neworleans

Jos :

She literally admitted to killing them

uty :

SHE LITERALLY FUCKING ADMITTED IT

IamnEz :

NAME 1 FACT

jemyahsworld :

these people are not watching the actual trial and it’s so apparent

Ken Hurd :

she's innocent it was mental health

lovenothate070 :

more comments th n like😂

Nick🕷️ :

Tasha 🤍🖤 :

@Tasha 🤍🖤: So I was just telling my ChatGPT just to entertain me. What evidence is there that shows Lindsay Clancy didn’t do it? I already know she did, but I’m just trying to get in the minds of all these psychotic people and this is what it said. Honestly? There is no actual evidence showing Lindsay didn’t physically kill the children. Her own defense isn’t claiming someone else did it. She has acknowledged killing them, and the defense’s argument is that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and therefore wasn’t legally responsible—not that she was innocent or that Patrick did it. Her supporters point to things like the untested knife, missing fingerprints or DNA on the bands, inconsistencies about whether she spoke after the fall, and questions about the exact timeline. Those may challenge parts of Patrick’s account or the investigation, but none of them prove another person killed the children. So when they say, “There’s more evidence that she didn’t do it,” ask them to name one actual piece of evidence—not a suspicion, TikTok theory, or unanswered question. Because there isn’t any. The real dispute at trial is her mental state and criminal responsibility, not who physically killed those babies.

kandykultzzz :

Die on this hill wit u girly

ThatOneGuy :

I seen the case she admitted it and all the proof of the case was pointed to her

i papai :

she said she did it

Bale vrfs 𐕣 :

Since the comments just started can we have a simple debate

Scpeditz :

Tell me one fact

Skinny :

The facts yall be talkin bout don’t even be facts 😂