@haileystel: 🚨 UPDATE IN THE LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL 🚨 The jury is STILL deadlocked after more than 27 hours of deliberations. This is now the second time they’ve told Judge William Sullivan that they cannot reach a unanimous verdict. The jury, made up of 9 women and 3 men, has been deliberating for five days. After hearing that they’re still unable to agree, Judge Sullivan gave them what’s known as a “dynamite” instruction, essentially sending them back to continue deliberating and urging them to reconsider their positions in an effort to reach a verdict. At this point… WHAT is happening in that jury room?! 👀 #L#LindsayClancyL#LindsayClancyTrialT#TrueCrimelindsayclancyverdict #lindsayclancycase

Hey Lee 👋🏽
Hey Lee 👋🏽
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 02 September 2026 23:35:42 GMT
10320
479
65
17

Music

Download

Comments

unfiltered390
FITTY FIT :
Lindsey is guilty, the 9 female jurors are the ones holding up this case. All the evidence proves her guilt & she even admits to doing it. This western generation of women is delulu.
2026-09-03 01:54:23
0
isthatherxo
Ms Chavez 🍉 :
If he does it a third time, it will be coerced. I think he had to instruct them once or twice
2026-09-03 01:58:12
12
secretsofaparalegal
Paralegal Life ⚖️ :
If they come back again deadlocked it’s a mistrial. I was in my own trial but my understanding is that he gave a dynamite charge today to them. If they come back still not able to decide they are done.
2026-09-02 23:45:36
29
vgggggg44444
vgggggg44444 :
This trial is literally one of the weirdest I’ve ever seen in real time and so is everyone involved.
2026-09-03 02:57:10
10
missjackieshann
J Shann 🇨🇦 :
thank goodness all the jurors aren't Taurus lol
2026-09-03 01:22:43
7
seao2008
𝐒𝐚ʳa𝕙 :
Exactly! I feel like it can even start to effect them psychologically. Like the people that want to be released from interrogation and finally just say they are guilty.
2026-09-02 23:53:58
49
geniemm8
GenieMM :
There were many comments on a post i saw a few days ago from people who had served on juries in murder cases where they said to the judge multiple times we cannot come to a decision. The judges have to urge them to go back once or twice. Then, these commentary saying they eventually agreed to lesser charges (example manslaughter instead of murder 1) because they didn't believe the accused was guilty but theh didn't want to risk them going to another jury and that jury finding them guilty of murder 1. WHAT. All because they were truthful the first few times and felt pressured to present a ruling.
2026-09-03 00:12:14
5
izzygeorgiar
izzygeorgiar :
Pressuring them to go back and argue again for a 2nd time to the point of exhaustion thinking them 9 women going change their mind. Absolutely not
2026-09-03 05:53:29
6
totallove_365
totallove_365 :
I agree. If a person says I won’t change he needs to let it go.
2026-09-02 23:57:47
7
hopesunshine1994
crispy2025 :
if a mistrial can Reddington open an investigation case for this case and did Lindsay say she did it and if she did was she under drugs or did Patrick tell her she did it and did she describe how she did it and we are not seeing everything
2026-09-02 23:53:32
17
ayanah11211
ayanah11211 :
Coercion. It is. I feel like we should change how trails are to what majority thinks or to not keep sending them back cuz ur basically forcing them to choose when they said they couldn’t. They gon choose whatever just to leave now
2026-09-03 03:26:21
0
nita_smiley
Nita Smiley :
That was my thought today. If the answer comes out different it’s not their truth. They are now being forced to choose
2026-09-03 01:12:58
1
ashhh.leyy
A S H L E Y♡❤️‍🔥♡❤️‍🔥 :
Coerced ...
2026-09-02 23:39:09
7
boymom079
BoyMommax1 :
I felt the same way
2026-09-03 01:10:57
3
dingoismynameo
Dingo :
It does make sense. This is par for the course, this is what the judge is supposed to do.
2026-09-02 23:45:46
3
marinamoniz899
marinamoniz899 :
thats what I said!
2026-09-02 23:41:45
1
ashdawn91
BoazboysMom :
@BoazboysMom: Massachusetts law is what dictates he has to send them back the 2nd time. 3 time ends in Mistrial. This is the Judge doing what the law requires of them all. However, I do agree with you.
2026-09-02 23:48:14
6
valdez_a
Alija Valdez :
I agree, we all have been in a situation where we say fuck it we want out of this situation. Not ok!
2026-09-03 01:06:06
1
bradyburnsproductions
Brady Burns Productions :
There’s no sentence for disagreement. There is no innocence with a disagreement. They need a decision one way or the other if it happens again though the procedure is a mistrial and the prosecution can bring another trial against her for the charges if they choose too
2026-09-02 23:45:20
3
bbberboo16
bbber🌙💀🧿 :
i saw something that said in Massachusetts they have to send them back 3 times...idk if that is true 🤔
2026-09-02 23:45:30
3
unfiltered390
FITTY FIT :
The female jurors are trying to let that murderer slide. (F) rights should be revoked.
2026-09-03 01:53:25
0
dingoismynameo
Dingo :
Its the 3rd time. Look up Tuey-Rodriguez or dynamite action.
2026-09-02 23:45:05
1
To see more videos from user @haileystel, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About