agrellagalega :
Very good for a short glimpse into a very complex history, just a small pointer: Try not to use the term "nationalist zone" or "nationals" to refer to the rebel forces, since that is the term that they themselves claimed, as using "national" implies they were the true defenders. They might have hated the term rebels, but that is what objectively they were, since they rebelled against a legitimate government. And as for the issue of it being fascistic or semifascistic, it is complex and also depends on which period we are talking: the traditional historiography divides the Franco regime in three distinct phases, the first, the falangist faces from the 40s to the early 50's characterized by autarchy, collaboration with axis powers and the importance of the falangist faction inside the government, this era I think can be called fascistic with a doubt, since falangism was basically the Spanish version of fascism. The second was the National Catholic, which is the one you described and that went mostly until the end of the 60's, and the last one would be the technocracy, which is characterized for more open market technocrats without a strong ideological drive being more in charge and a drive to present a more acceptable and open image of Spain towards the world and Europe and of course making things more blurry, even if some factions changed in power, they still had some influence and thus those three eras kind of bleed into the others a lot.
2026-09-03 17:07:53