𐌔𐌉ʀ 𐌄𐌀ʀ𐌋🪶 :
You guys aren't making any sense. Man City was founded way before Chelsea and won their first major trophy, an FA Cup, way before Chelsea. Man City were doing very well and were bigger than Chelsea way before the Abrahimovic takeover. So if we are going to talk about history, Man City had a pre-history before Chelsea and were a bigger club before Chelsea before the Abrahimovic takeover. Now during the Abrahimovic takeover, yes Chelsea achieved a lot and won their first Champions League and that, and then proceeded to do a couple of Premier League titles, right? Then after Mancini and Pellegrini and then Pep, City started to dominate the Premier League for almost 15 years now, almost a decade or more. So now what City has achieved is far beyond what Chelsea has achieved. They have more trophies than Chelsea. You could argue that Chelsea has two Champions League, fine. But City have won a treble. They've done a quadruple. They've done four in a row, and then they've done 100 points in a single season. That is not something I see Chelsea doing, right? So currently City is a bigger club than Chelsea, and all of you saying Chelsea has won every European title and they've completed football, you people are not serious. If you mention the Conference League, you are just putting Chelsea in jeopardy because Man City will not stoop that low currently to go and play the Conference League to win it. It's like you repeating yourself in a class and winning against the junior classes, and then saying, Oh, I wasn't able to get first when I was with you in the senior class, but I've gotten first in the junior class. So with all that, I'm a bigger person than you. That's not true. I don't think Man City will ever stoop that low to play at Conference League, yeah, to win it. So it's an argument that is always going to be biased.
2026-09-03 17:21:31