@maklelan: #maklelan3447 Five Bible contradictions you can’t make go away (Part 2)

Gezge :

There are not contradictions, but your misleading interpretation.

كل :

The Bible has thousands of contradictions

DaKxlebGuy🥷🏾☦️ :

Can talk about John smith

Knightly thoughts :

I am curious Dan….do you still believe in God after knowing the bible the way you do? I am mainly very curious because I love your content and the education of the bible you are providing me… but if I am going to be honest I am now more of an atheist. So if you do in fact still believe I am wondering what brought you to that decision.

Chris Blum507 :

I would love a discussion about what's going on in Matt 1:23 where the part about the prophecy of him being named Emmanuel is apparently not fulfilled.

إلياس :

can't wait for the cope in the comments😂😂

miserablebowl :

“Doin’ it Roman Style” just means lots of counting during the event.

Milton Friedman :

Even the two creation stories have inconsistencies

StormyRains27 :

Why does Jesus not have the name Emanuel? What is Jesus real name?

Kýrie Eleison :

V. On the Lukan side, the text claims that the return on the fortieth day ("καὶ ὡς ἐτέλεσαν πάντα τὰ κατὰ τὸν νόμον κυρίου, ἐπέστρεψαν εἰς τὴν Γαλιλαίαν εἰς πόλιν ἑαυτῶν Ναζαρέτ" - "And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth") excludes the Matthean sequence of events. Here, however, the text imposes a requirement of precision on Luke which the genre rules of ancient narrative do not impose, and which Luke himself does not undertake. The Lukan summary transition is a characteristic structural tool: the author closes the narrated unit and leads the characters to the location of the next scene without stating anything about the intervening period. That this is not a defensive assumption, but a demonstrable authorial procedure in Luke, can be verified in a place where we have an independent control source: in the Acts of the Apostles, Luke summarizes the period following the events in Damascus in such a way that the stay in Arabia - which Paul himself reports in the Epistle to the Galatians (Gal 1:17-18) - is not featured in it at all, even though it involves years. Whoever labels Luke a liar or an incompetent narrator because of the omission in the birth story should say the same there, where the omission is demonstrably a mere summary. The text thus selectively applies a standard which, if applied consistently, would cause its own argument to collapse as well.

MisterMuckraker :

Ok bro i am going with the understanding of the founders…

Loe Lewis Brown bomber :

its an entirely different story i agree

Dyex :

This east wiseman are written in Chinese history books, they did know the star that was bright at birth of God. It’s a good validation. ✝️🙏

ginama66 :

wouldn't there have been primary sources to check before writing these gospels? it was less than 100 years.

Aaron Massey856 :

the important question from this is, how ought this effect non believers? is this good reason not to believe?

arod79 :

Can you make a video about Joseph Smith?

T I K T O K T O M T O M :

Why would a contradiction like this and many others happen? Wouldn’t the authors have access to the other’s work?

Aaron Massey856 :

I dont like the term "contradiction" as it really means it refutes itself. the better term is unresolved conflict. as they are 2 author telling the same story with diffrent perspectives.

altcultofficial :

You’d think out of all the edits made they would actually create a clean story.

Agnostic Atheist 🧠 :

14 resurrection events in the Bible. 😂 2 unicorns, but no dinosaurs. 🤔

eMeSaR :

Evidently referring to the book written by the prophet Isaiah (Isa 11:1), in which the promised Messiah is referred to as ‘a sprout [Hebrew, neʹtser] out of the roots of Jesse.’ Since Matthew speaks of “prophets” in plural, he may also have been referring to Jeremiah, who wrote about “a righteous sprout” as an offshoot of David (Jer 23:5; 33:15), and to Zechariah, who describes a king-priest “whose name is Sprout” (Zec 3:8; 6:12, 13). The term “Nazarene” became an epithet applied to Jesus and later to his followers.

therealjakestrong2023 :

Ian Malkaviac :

I have a question, I saw a tiktok video of some guy yelling in a mall about the rapture so it made me look up. Matthew 6:5 - 8 And I noticed that in Matthew 7 there is a word that is rendered as heathens in KJV, pagans in NIV, and gentiles in NRSVUE. I am wondering if you can speak to what the actual word originally was and why it's translated to these different words.

MP Poirier :

Why would Mary be less disgraced if Joseph divorced her (though they were not married) than if they had stayed mum and stayed together? It doesn’t make sense. Throughout history, men married pregnant women to preserve their honor and dignity.

Akshar Premnath :

exhausting debating Catholics that believe in inerrancy