@mymy93221: Khi sếp quan ttrọng kết quả không quan trọng quá trình #xuhuong #xuhuong

Nhi tỷ
Nhi tỷ
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Friday 04 September 2026 01:26:42 GMT
239284
10882
45
917

Music

Download

Comments

dandan.1809
ĐanĐan1809 :
chỉ cần bạn gánh công ty trên vai, bạn làm "bố" sếp
2026-09-04 04:49:29
203
cow_arie4
Thích uống sữa thú nhất ♈️ :
Quả CTY toàn thần nhân
2026-09-04 13:00:57
27
user530994075
Hoang Nguyen Viet :
chữ trên cái bảng nghĩa là gì nhỉ
2026-09-04 09:30:36
31
quangminhphan65cantho
QuangMinhPhan :
có đc mấy hợp đồng đó thì mở CTY làm chủ luôn ,đi làm chỉ cho mệt 😁😁
2026-09-04 11:01:13
19
a9103588
LÒNG TỐT & SỰ TỬ TẾ :
3 giờ chiều rồi sao cậu ko tan làm đi hả 😂😆
2026-09-04 04:56:34
17
ht2923
HT :
Chốt cở đó thì nghĩ cả năm còn được 😂
2026-09-05 08:02:48
1
linhtuong0402
linhtuong0402 :
Xem này hài quãi 😂 😂
2026-09-04 10:42:14
4
letanthanhvt
Tấn Thành :
xin tên series này với ạ
2026-09-04 11:08:37
4
user7802671339483
Thiên Bảo :
cty t khoán việc hẵn hoi làm xong sớm là giao thêm việc xong sớm nữa giao thêm nữa với tiêu chí giao việc theo năng lực trả lương theo vùng
2026-09-05 08:11:24
0
vuduchuy199
WuHui😶‍🌫️ :
Nó ko đến Cty nhưng nó vẫn lm đủ nó có chs đâu
2026-09-04 16:44:18
0
mt.pht.mt
một phút mốt :
😂😂😂😂
2026-09-04 09:46:16
2
thai.ha.1234
Thái Hà 1234 :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 12:56:23
1
55kg55ok
60kg đổi tên :v :
lằn nhằng. đưa cái giấy nghỉ việc là rén liền
2026-09-04 04:48:58
3
b.i.u90
Bố Đậu Mỡ :
😂😂😂 Kết quả top 1 cần méo gì đến công ty 🤣🤣🤣 nội quy quần què
2026-09-04 13:45:30
1
sangnguyenngstory
San. :
Nhờ thằng này mới có tiền trả cho thằng giữ kho chứ. [Cười lớn][Cười lớn]
2026-09-06 06:13:09
0
lugia_312
Lỳ 🐳 :
😆😆😆
2026-09-04 03:01:53
5
ngocthiennguyen11
Ngocthien Nguyen :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 18:21:20
1
user068656647
Trung Đô :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-09-04 21:50:29
1
ghost25.1
Ghost 25.1 :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 11:19:29
2
shopphamtinh37
SHOP PHẠM TÌNH :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 13:05:38
1
ty36469
Trịnh Tý :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 11:08:25
2
hoacucvang12345
hoacucvang12345 :
😂😂😂😂😂
2026-09-04 14:20:17
1
hoangphat05939
Hoàng.Thanh.Phát :
😂😂😂
2026-09-04 10:30:01
1
To see more videos from user @mymy93221, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #larp #tlpur #cycle #viral #nuke
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #larp #tlpur #cycle #viral #nuke

About