@mind_of_colyn: Her loss @Colyn Dufala

Mind Of Colyn
Mind Of Colyn
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 04 September 2026 19:26:29 GMT
4782
830
11
26

Music

Download

Comments

landon.johnson443
Landon Johnson :
She’s ghosting me
2026-09-05 04:24:12
0
colyn.dufala
Colyn Dufala :
Get so out of her league, even she knows she doesn't have a shot.
2026-09-04 19:31:54
3
debrowntowing
Debrown Towing Services(crane) :
thank you man my situation right now
2026-09-04 20:34:40
0
benjamingitau670
@ Bèñjí G :
brooh you kill it 😂😂
2026-09-04 19:32:51
0
p9t9k9
PTK999 :
exactly
2026-09-04 23:02:46
0
amandaaudu168
Mandah :
yhh u right
2026-09-04 20:35:00
1
hybrid.boss.inter2
Hybrid boss International :
BELIEVE
2026-09-04 21:07:16
0
e.iganago
e.iganago :
bro
2026-09-04 21:47:41
0
vinanthony0
VIN ANTHONY 💯🇺🇬 :
I like it 👍
2026-09-04 19:38:14
0
zion.mark35
Zion mark :
hmm yh🤔
2026-09-04 19:46:32
0
stormsofficial2007
storms official :
exactly
2026-09-04 22:05:26
0
benjamingitau670
@ Bèñjí G :
😅😅😅😅
2026-09-04 19:32:38
0
To see more videos from user @mind_of_colyn, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Why are we so tolerant of people being wrong? Why do we shrug off wilful ignorance, or somebody being pig-headed? We often say, ‘It’s not their fault,’ or that, ‘They are misunderstood.’ But, according to the philosopher Quassim Cassam, we should take more seriously what he called epistemic vices.  A vice is a kind of character fault that’s usually seen in moral terms. So, cowardice, cruelty, and selfishness are vices, and, in each case, we call them out. We say it’s bad to be selfish. We teach kids not to be cruel. We tend to punish moral vices, either socially, through things like exclusion, or through our legal systems. And Cassam asks why it is we don’t do the same thing with epistemic vices. If somebody is wilfully ignorant —they don’t care about the truth, or about finding out an answer — why do we not call that out? Why do we not punish somebody who is stubborn, arrogant, or utterly unwilling to entertain alternative beliefs?  Cassam argues that intellectual vices are wrong because they prevent us from making better real-life decisions based upon accurate beliefs. He cites the Bush administration’s epistemic arrogance as a reason for the disastrous post-invasion administration of Iraq. He thinks that the closed-mindedness and wishful thinking of conspiracy theorists prevents us from real solutions to real problems. For Cassam, we shouldn’t just laugh off, or shrug away, intellectual vices. We should hold people blameworthy and accountable. Because, if we don’t do that, then we will all suffer under the consequences of ill-thought-out and foolish decisions from people out of touch with the world.
Why are we so tolerant of people being wrong? Why do we shrug off wilful ignorance, or somebody being pig-headed? We often say, ‘It’s not their fault,’ or that, ‘They are misunderstood.’ But, according to the philosopher Quassim Cassam, we should take more seriously what he called epistemic vices. A vice is a kind of character fault that’s usually seen in moral terms. So, cowardice, cruelty, and selfishness are vices, and, in each case, we call them out. We say it’s bad to be selfish. We teach kids not to be cruel. We tend to punish moral vices, either socially, through things like exclusion, or through our legal systems. And Cassam asks why it is we don’t do the same thing with epistemic vices. If somebody is wilfully ignorant —they don’t care about the truth, or about finding out an answer — why do we not call that out? Why do we not punish somebody who is stubborn, arrogant, or utterly unwilling to entertain alternative beliefs? Cassam argues that intellectual vices are wrong because they prevent us from making better real-life decisions based upon accurate beliefs. He cites the Bush administration’s epistemic arrogance as a reason for the disastrous post-invasion administration of Iraq. He thinks that the closed-mindedness and wishful thinking of conspiracy theorists prevents us from real solutions to real problems. For Cassam, we shouldn’t just laugh off, or shrug away, intellectual vices. We should hold people blameworthy and accountable. Because, if we don’t do that, then we will all suffer under the consequences of ill-thought-out and foolish decisions from people out of touch with the world.

About