@mikerafi: Why Lindsay Clancy Got a Mistrial #lawyer #law #court #attorney #personalinjurylawyer

J :

William Tillman779 :

what is the point of being a juror if you are made to fall inline and not think for yourself

ChiefDrake2006 :

What rule did they say the one juror was breaking?

Juliuscaesar :

One lady said, “you only cared when the children were murdered, why dont you care about the mother?” Because SHE IS A SELF ADMITTED MURDERER?!?!? She admitted to it, and admitted to planning it prior to the event! Thats first degree murder..

Chris✝️ :

Bro genuinely deserves a Nobel peace prize and the medal of honour for holding it down

Tom :

the jury wasn't sequestered. i find it very hard to believe they all judged just based on evidence and weren't swayed by media and social media narratives

UniversalEcho :

some of y'all dont understand reasonable doubt.

The Retro Gent :

Insanity shouldn’t even be an option in courts. If you did it you did it your mental state isn’t others problems

Titan :

the 1 holdout came forward saying they believe the 11 were not obtained from media influence and had influence on their verdicts

Joe Evans :

Reddington comments after this trial seem unethical. Not condemning the conspiracy theories of Patrick and him villifying this juror.

clarkscorner1 :

since when were judges allowed to order a jurry to decide the way he wants it to be like nah this is covering up something a hell of alot kore dangerous than murder

Facts :

U kinda look like th attorney from the rookie

pasha.hdr :

Poor kids. God be with them ❤️‍🩹

Austin Manke :

How a juror votes is based on his/her opinion of the evidence and if it is beyond a reasonable doubt, so if that one juror had an opinion that the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she is guilty then he is entitled to that opinion. That is why it takes all 12 in agreement to get a complete verdict.

Gforce0569 :

Me for that one juror

ruisuu01 :

that one men

stringbean64 :

Honestly this whole case was a disaster and a mistrial might have been the best outcome. No matter what way the verdict would have been sided, we clearly have people thinking that's wrong. I'm not really sure why this case needed media attention as I knew nothing about it till this last week.

portside_og :

If it’s legal for a jury to nullify a guilty verdict when it’s proven beyond reasonable doubt, why would he not be allowed to stop a NG or NGRI verdict even if he does have “reasonable doubt”

Dessa 🏳️‍⚧️ :

IMO 12 should be needed to convict but only 10 to acquit

Brayden :

Is someone able to please explain what this hold out is for? I haven't been following very well admittedly, so is it a good thing that it was a mistrial? Why was this one dude holding out?

Hyyypower :

did they say which way the 11-1 split was?

Andrew Wessel :

THANK GOD FOR THAT JUROR ! Btw, reddingtons behaviour is absolutely abhorrent