ash_annXO
Region: US
Saturday 05 September 2026 20:36:33 GMT
183329
9355
794
2826
Music
Download
Comments
Sanchez_S 🍃 :
It’s Sooo Obvious who has Actually watched the trials & WHO HAS NOT.!
2026-09-06 13:42:37
2099
slick182 :
She not only confessed, but wrote a detailed account in her civil trial. That is a confession.
2026-09-07 02:34:04
57
punkyyb20💙🦋📚 :
I stopped explaining it to ppl because you truly cannot argue with ignorance! Even when she woke up from the coma she didn’t say she did it! She said she didn’t remember what happened, she only remembers a male voice telling her she had to do it.
2026-09-06 17:13:00
448
Moomlight :
LINDSEY NEVER SAID SHE DID IT. THE COURT DID FOR COURT PURPOSES..
2026-09-06 16:35:46
1054
brendamallette10 :
she couldn't talk he crushed her neck
2026-09-06 13:06:47
81
Amanda 💙🧷 :
CoMmEnT iSnT AvaILaBle. 😂
2026-09-07 22:19:47
0
La.Xicana :
People are dumb. Lindsay NEVER legally confessed to murdering her children. There was never a courtroom moment where Lindsay personally stood up, under oath, and said, “I killed my children.” Her lawyer Kevin Reddington DID tell the jury that Lindsay killed the children. He did this as part of the defense strategy! Not because he was arguing that she was legally guilty. His entire argument was that although she committed the physical acts, she lacked criminal responsibility because of her mental state. This case is a literally confusing people because they hear Reddington say things like “when she killed her children.” He simply deliberately acknowledging the underlying conduct while FIGHTING the criminal responsibility element. AKA her psychosis. One thing is what Lindsay says outside of court versus actually inside people.
2026-09-07 05:34:28
8
Brandon :
except she admitted it to the chaplain, to a psych doc, her husband, and the lawyer even said she did it
2026-09-06 16:22:07
133
MARIAELENAMENDEZ13 :
She’s innocent
2026-09-06 05:47:25
98
🍫📸🍷🍒💎 :
This argument is draining
2026-09-07 22:20:29
1
🌺Quida🌸 :
Lindsey is innocent 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 Patrick framed her and didn’t expect for her to survive
2026-09-07 18:54:30
6
SkolNation :
her attorney literally said she did it
2026-09-06 00:37:02
48
Dr Engels :
In Massachusetts, she had to maintain a not-guilty plea to take the lack of criminal responsibility defense to trial. “Not guilty” does not mean her defense was claiming she didn’t commit the acts.
2026-09-06 05:19:41
23
Nicole Melicia :
There is no arguing with these people who believe she’s admitted. They’re insufferable 🙄
2026-09-06 16:00:34
34
michellecurtis907 :
I hate to tell you it’s documented in court verified reporting
2026-09-07 21:23:37
0
Jae📖 🌼 :
These people don’t understand how a plea works 😂😂😂
2026-09-07 04:12:03
5
feralaesthetic :
47 times btw
2026-09-07 14:43:20
0
kay_tee_kc :
She’s pleading not guilty to the charge of murder. This does not mean she is saying she didn’t do it, just that she would rather be charged with something like homicide.
2026-09-06 00:38:30
14
James-BigYoungin-Gooldrup :
So if the father wasn’t home and she pleading not guilty then who killed the kid’s? She is alive so she would know who killed her kids if it was someone that’s not her or the father
2026-09-07 12:46:52
0
💕Clear / Rhys💕 :
it's crazy how these people think the 12 jurors who all got more information than we did and had more intricate and in depth discussions all this are just wrong and liars because THEY feel differently about what THEY saw on TV
2026-09-07 13:26:15
0
T :
Her lawyer did
2026-09-06 10:32:28
0
memmsmns :
i’m trying not to get into a debate of who did what I am just really curious on your thought or view. Do you not believe that the defense stipulated to the evidence or do you have a different view of that?
2026-09-06 16:14:51
0
jp2223 :
lol ok then please explain her lawyer’s quote- “ her medicine and state of mind caused this tragedy “ ? lol she did admit to husband champlin and physiatrists! Please watch the whole thing not snipets on TikTok lol
2026-09-06 13:14:48
1
JohnnyO :
The trial is convoluted, reading is better. She plead not guilty but acknowledges killing the children bc that is the basis for the ability to use the claim of “not guilty due to reason of insanity”. Further, the 11 jurors who voted to acquit voted to acquit her on the basis of insanity, aquittal usually means “walk free” but this is a “prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was of sane mind” case, not “prove beyond a reasonable doubt she did it”. Consequently, acquitting her here in this special case means she is acquitted of responsibility and is sent to a mental institute and not a prison. Literally just google things these are just the facts
2026-09-07 08:48:20
4
To see more videos from user @ash_annxo, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
