@nekkowan: 来世はイコラブ #キャバクラ #キャバ嬢 #ミナミキャバ嬢 #ミナミ #おすすめ

ねねちゃん！！！！！

Open In TikTok:

Region: JP

Saturday 05 September 2026 22:14:55 GMT

523

107

4

0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.45MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.08MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.51MB) Music .mp3

Comments

qfirz__ :

普通にイコラブのどのメンバーよりも可愛い

2026-09-06 02:25:15

0

まー :

ねねちゃん🐣❤️踊りお上手╰(´︶`)╯♡

2026-09-05 23:22:40

0

齊藤洋一 :

かわいい💖💖

2026-09-05 22:43:42

0

金城　豐 :

🥰✨❤️

2026-09-06 03:13:35

0

To see more videos from user @nekkowan, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

serrrr #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #ngibingjoged

serrrr #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #ngibingjoged

Lăn khử mùi AUREVIET #lannach #lankhumui #lannachkhumui #lankhumuiaureviet #goccuagiangne

Lăn khử mùi AUREVIET #lannach #lankhumui #lannachkhumui #lankhumuiaureviet #goccuagiangne

Wiring my car the EASY way! (Part 3) #car #electric #restore

Wiring my car the EASY way! (Part 3) #car #electric #restore

𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝟮--𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗚𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗔 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗗𝗥. 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗦𝗢'𝗦 𝗠𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥 HOW RIGATHI GACHAGUA GOT INTELLIGENCE ON DR. VICTORIA MUTISO'S MURDER — PART 2 THE QUESTION THAT CHANGED THE INVESTIGATION How did former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua appear to know details about the murder of Dr. Victoria Nthunya Mutiso before investigators publicly revealed some of those details? That question has become one of the most intriguing aspects of the investigation into the July 29, 2026 killing of Dr. Mutiso. What began as the shocking murder of a respected mental-health researcher in Nairobi soon developed into a complex investigation involving allegations of careful planning, a long-running land dispute, serving police officers, alleged communications between Gachagua and people connected to the investigation, and a growing political dispute over the direction of the probe. At the centre of the controversy is one question: Where did Gachagua get his information? Gachagua has maintained that he received credible information from sources within government and security circles. The DCI, however, publicly questioned his communications with individuals investigators considered important to the case. Neither explanation, by itself, establishes wrongdoing. The identity of Gachagua's alleged intelligence sources has not been publicly established, and allegations made during an investigation are not the same as findings of guilt. But the controversy has created a second story running alongside the murder investigation—a battle over information, intelligence and who knew what before detectives made their findings public. THE MORNING DR. MUTISO WAS KILLED On July 29, 2026, Dr. Victoria Nthunya Mutiso left her residence in Nairobi and began her journey to work. According to the account later presented by DCI Director Mohamed Amin, Dr. Mutiso was travelling in an Uber towards the Africa Institute of Mental and Brain Health in Upper Hill. Investigators said the attack happened at about 9:23 in the morning. The DCI later told the media that a vehicle obstructed the Uber's path, creating an opportunity for an attacker to target the vehicle. The driver then rushed Dr. Mutiso to Kenyatta National Hospital, where she was pronounced dead. Her death immediately shocked colleagues, friends, relatives and members of the public. But for investigators, the first challenge was reconstructing exactly what had happened. Who had followed her? Who knew her movements? Who had information about her routine? And most importantly, was the killing random, or had it been planned? Those questions would become central to the investigation. THE FIRST STAGE OF THE INVESTIGATION The initial investigation was handled by detectives in Nairobi before the case was taken over by specialised homicide investigators. The DCI said several investigative units became involved, including forensic investigators, intelligence officers and teams analysing CCTV footage. According to the DCI, investigators reconstructed the movements of people and vehicles connected to the incident. The investigation eventually led detectives to several people whom they considered important to the case. The DCI later announced the arrest of Daniel Mwangi Njoroge, Kevin Ngugi Kinuthia and Police Constable Elijah Kibelion Kimoi. A Nairobi court subsequently allowed detectives to hold the three for 30 days while investigations continued. The court proceedings did not amount to convictions. This distinction is important because the people identified by investigators remained suspects, and the allegations against them had to be tested through the judicial process. For investigators, however, the arrests represented a significant development in their attempt to reconstruct what happened on the morning Dr. Mutiso was killed. The question was no longer simply who pulled the trigger, but whether there was a larger network behind the attack. #DrVictoriaMutiso #TheMurder

𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝟮--𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗚𝗔𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗔 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗗𝗥. 𝗠𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗦𝗢'𝗦 𝗠𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥 HOW RIGATHI GACHAGUA GOT INTELLIGENCE ON DR. VICTORIA MUTISO'S MURDER — PART 2 THE QUESTION THAT CHANGED THE INVESTIGATION How did former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua appear to know details about the murder of Dr. Victoria Nthunya Mutiso before investigators publicly revealed some of those details? That question has become one of the most intriguing aspects of the investigation into the July 29, 2026 killing of Dr. Mutiso. What began as the shocking murder of a respected mental-health researcher in Nairobi soon developed into a complex investigation involving allegations of careful planning, a long-running land dispute, serving police officers, alleged communications between Gachagua and people connected to the investigation, and a growing political dispute over the direction of the probe. At the centre of the controversy is one question: Where did Gachagua get his information? Gachagua has maintained that he received credible information from sources within government and security circles. The DCI, however, publicly questioned his communications with individuals investigators considered important to the case. Neither explanation, by itself, establishes wrongdoing. The identity of Gachagua's alleged intelligence sources has not been publicly established, and allegations made during an investigation are not the same as findings of guilt. But the controversy has created a second story running alongside the murder investigation—a battle over information, intelligence and who knew what before detectives made their findings public. THE MORNING DR. MUTISO WAS KILLED On July 29, 2026, Dr. Victoria Nthunya Mutiso left her residence in Nairobi and began her journey to work. According to the account later presented by DCI Director Mohamed Amin, Dr. Mutiso was travelling in an Uber towards the Africa Institute of Mental and Brain Health in Upper Hill. Investigators said the attack happened at about 9:23 in the morning. The DCI later told the media that a vehicle obstructed the Uber's path, creating an opportunity for an attacker to target the vehicle. The driver then rushed Dr. Mutiso to Kenyatta National Hospital, where she was pronounced dead. Her death immediately shocked colleagues, friends, relatives and members of the public. But for investigators, the first challenge was reconstructing exactly what had happened. Who had followed her? Who knew her movements? Who had information about her routine? And most importantly, was the killing random, or had it been planned? Those questions would become central to the investigation. THE FIRST STAGE OF THE INVESTIGATION The initial investigation was handled by detectives in Nairobi before the case was taken over by specialised homicide investigators. The DCI said several investigative units became involved, including forensic investigators, intelligence officers and teams analysing CCTV footage. According to the DCI, investigators reconstructed the movements of people and vehicles connected to the incident. The investigation eventually led detectives to several people whom they considered important to the case. The DCI later announced the arrest of Daniel Mwangi Njoroge, Kevin Ngugi Kinuthia and Police Constable Elijah Kibelion Kimoi. A Nairobi court subsequently allowed detectives to hold the three for 30 days while investigations continued. The court proceedings did not amount to convictions. This distinction is important because the people identified by investigators remained suspects, and the allegations against them had to be tested through the judicial process. For investigators, however, the arrests represented a significant development in their attempt to reconstruct what happened on the morning Dr. Mutiso was killed. The question was no longer simply who pulled the trigger, but whether there was a larger network behind the attack. #DrVictoriaMutiso #TheMurder

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy