Aurelius
Region: US
Sunday 06 September 2026 22:53:07 GMT
25553
3903
184
160
Music
Download
Comments
Khali :
Atheists think they are smarter because they dont believe in god 💀
2026-09-10 05:40:18
0
🤣 :
All of the early converts of islam were adults like what
2026-09-06 23:42:48
539
ᴍᴀʀᴄᴜꜱ :
Should I convert (or revert) to Islam? Lowk been thinking about it as a Catholic.
2026-09-06 23:40:11
108
Xavier 🇺🇸🔻 :
Raised atheist now Muslim ☝️
2026-09-07 22:13:57
229
Αλβέρτ☦️ :
Total theist victory
2026-09-07 07:46:21
112
jelani✝️☦️🇻🇦 :
thank you my theist friend
2026-09-07 21:39:29
73
Bolide 🇺🇸🇵🇰 :
All of the smartest people were religious 😂😂😂
2026-09-08 12:22:33
55
ERICEL🇪🇷💊✡️ :
i love islam sm
2026-09-09 02:34:05
11
✟🗝️Papist 🇻🇦✟ :
their view is insanely hypocritical they don't even notice it
2026-09-07 11:17:54
42
boo hooo :
Religion is when no critical thinking
2026-09-07 19:28:28
12
akram :
modern astronomy medicine optic and much more exist because of islam
2026-09-07 10:27:48
40
tristan🇻🇦 :
Disproving atheist but Islam 😬
2026-09-07 04:57:36
8
ⵣ National Salad :
god i thought my fyp betrayed me
2026-09-09 12:00:47
0
a :
Finally someone that uses traditional logic. I don’t understand people who use modal logic for argumentation even though Aristotelian logic is better. Good work, your account has good videos
2026-09-07 06:59:42
26
frdws🌸 :
tad (anti theist)
2026-09-07 19:41:29
4
stark.ae734 :
I agree with the first one 100%.
2026-09-06 23:35:33
6
✦☾⛧✧𝖟𝖎𝖐𝖗𝖎𝖊✧⛧☽✦ :
finally one with word not philosophy code
2026-09-07 13:02:17
6
ronaldo pasta :
Brother dont use music as a muslim
2026-09-07 11:11:36
5
ابو جليل :
Also like traditional sufism is a great example of Islam and thinking because a core pillar is thinking about Allah and devotion
2026-09-07 08:25:52
6
Ibraheem467 :
Music??
2026-09-06 23:40:44
6
Aarav kumer :
How is C1 extrapolated from those premises? Since a finite perspective is limited, and an objective account of reality cannot be limited by any perspective, if a completely objective account of reality exists, it must transcend every finite perspective. From this, we cannot extrapolate that there does exist a transcendent ground of complete objectivity, only that if there is the aforementioned, it must occupy the traits mentioned. C1 is a premise in and of itself, and has a hidden assumption (obviously, the existence of a transcendent ground of objectivity). In which case, your argument largely collapses, since it would merely become circular reasoning. In which case, your second argument largely collapses. Beyond that, Premise 2 faces a problem here: "must contain or comprehend the complete truth of reality". Those two are not the same thing and are not interchangeable. An underlying realm of pure truth could contain the complete truth of reality in theory, but not comprehend it. Therefore, "must" is misapplied and renders the upcoming premise useless for the obvious reason of collapse via poisoned fruit. Even if granted, it comes to a halt at the very next premise (P4). In this case, this is a non-sequitur. P4 does not follow from P3 since you have not demonstrated personhood, intellect, or a "form" of any sort in P1-P3 but assume their existence via usage of the word possession and of the term omniscience.
2026-09-08 11:47:06
2
Nicholas_Smarge2026✨ :
critical thinking made me mystical theist
2026-09-07 17:01:14
0
Treetr :
i love all theists
2026-09-08 05:03:28
2
d o p 🇨🇴 الله أكبر ☝🏼 :
I love the union between Christians and Muslims in the comment section, gives me hope in humanity
2026-09-08 03:59:06
1
To see more videos from user @swt.mwt, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
