@libafron: кто не понял позиция называется украина #cs #кс #ксприколы

jokept
jokept
Open In TikTok:
Region: UA
Monday 07 September 2026 18:35:50 GMT
3300
48
11
33

Music

Download

Comments

s3ndveil
s3ɴᴅ🌲 :
"ето"
2026-09-08 05:52:51
6
pigwar3
Pigwey2837 :
пожалуй я отпишусь
2026-09-07 20:02:11
2
tema540973
tema :
братан как людям объяснить что это позиция Украина?
2026-09-08 05:20:05
5
bl1nchik001
Bl1nchik :
2026-09-08 09:04:15
0
hoord_drx
Рейнхард :
Штурм как всегда не увенчался успехом
2026-09-08 09:11:31
0
huligan4k32
HuLiGaN4K :
Ето🥀🥀🥀
2026-09-08 07:46:13
0
To see more videos from user @libafron, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Louis Vuitton may have won in court, but it appears to be losing public support in China. In May 2025, LV sued Chinese tea chain Molly Tea over its four-petal logo. More than a year later, a Suzhou court ruled that the design infringed seven of LV’s registered trademarks, ordering Molly Tea to stop using it and pay 10.3 million yuan—around $1.5 million. But critics argue that LV’s own four-petal motif was inspired by the baoxiang flower (宝相花), a traditional Chinese pattern dating back more than 1,000 years. Chinese social media users are now comparing LV’s monogram with similar designs found on Tang Dynasty instruments, ancient murals, temple carvings and Suzhou garden windows. Many accuse LV of trying to monopolise part of China’s cultural heritage, while scholars are questioning whether modern trademark law should allow ancient cultural symbols to become commercially controlled. The hashtag “Molly Tea lost the lawsuit but won the public’s heart” has attracted more than 30 million views, with some consumers now calling for a boycott of LV. LVMH has responded by calling intellectual property one of its “core assets” and saying it regularly handles infringement cases worldwide. However, it did not directly address the baoxiang flower comparisons while the case remains ongoing. The ruling is not yet final, and Molly Tea has announced plans to appeal. 💭 Who really owns a flower pattern that existed centuries before modern trademarks? 👇🏼 #lv #mollytea #legalbattle #trademark #bubbletea
Louis Vuitton may have won in court, but it appears to be losing public support in China. In May 2025, LV sued Chinese tea chain Molly Tea over its four-petal logo. More than a year later, a Suzhou court ruled that the design infringed seven of LV’s registered trademarks, ordering Molly Tea to stop using it and pay 10.3 million yuan—around $1.5 million. But critics argue that LV’s own four-petal motif was inspired by the baoxiang flower (宝相花), a traditional Chinese pattern dating back more than 1,000 years. Chinese social media users are now comparing LV’s monogram with similar designs found on Tang Dynasty instruments, ancient murals, temple carvings and Suzhou garden windows. Many accuse LV of trying to monopolise part of China’s cultural heritage, while scholars are questioning whether modern trademark law should allow ancient cultural symbols to become commercially controlled. The hashtag “Molly Tea lost the lawsuit but won the public’s heart” has attracted more than 30 million views, with some consumers now calling for a boycott of LV. LVMH has responded by calling intellectual property one of its “core assets” and saying it regularly handles infringement cases worldwide. However, it did not directly address the baoxiang flower comparisons while the case remains ongoing. The ruling is not yet final, and Molly Tea has announced plans to appeal. 💭 Who really owns a flower pattern that existed centuries before modern trademarks? 👇🏼 #lv #mollytea #legalbattle #trademark #bubbletea

About